Advertisement

Assessing Consciousness in Critically Ill Patients

  • S. Laureys
  • S. Majerus
  • G. Moonen

Abstract

An accurate and reliable evaluation of the state of consciousness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is of primordial importance for their appropriate management. Altered states of consciousness are commonly encountered in ICUs. Even excluding neurological and neurosurgical ICUs, altered states of consciousness are the primary reason for adult ICU admission in 3 to 7% of cases [1]. Additionally, secondary alterations of consciousness due to encephalopathy, seizures, and cerebrovascular accidents are known to occur in one-eighth of unselected patients admitted to a medical ICU, and even more frequently in those with sepsis [2, 3]. Up to one-fifth of patients develop an acute confusional state in the ICU [4].

Keywords

Glasgow Coma Scale Brain Death Verbal Score Persistent Vegetative State Consciousness Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Groeger JS, Strosberg MA, Halpern NA, et al (1992) Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States. Crit Care Med 20: 846–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bleck TP, Smith MC, Pierre-Louis SJ, et al (1993) Neurologic complications of critical medical illnesses. Crit Care Med 21: 98–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papadopoulos MC, Davies DC, Moss RF, Tighe D, Bennett ED (2000) Pathophysiology of septic encephalopathy: a review. Crit Care Med 28: 3019–3024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubois MJ, Bergeron N, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y (2001) Delirium in an intensive care unit: a study of risk factors. Intensive Care Med 27: 1297–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plum F, Posner JB (1983) The Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma. FA Davis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Llinas R, Ribary U, Contreras D, Pedroarena C (1998) The neuronal basis for consciousness. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 1841–1849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallup GG Jr (1997) On the rise and fall of self-conception in primates. Ann N Y Acad Sci 818: 72–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moscovitch M (1995) Models of consciousness and memory. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The Cognitive Neurosciences. Bradford Book MIT Press, Cambridge, pp: 1341–1356Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sacks O (1985) The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat. Summit Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Psychiatric Association. Task Force on DSM-IV (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2: 81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennett B (1972) Prognosis after severe head injury. Clin Neurosurg 19: 200–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Feriotti G (1980) Prolonged posttraumatic unconsciousness: therapeutic assets and liabilities. J Neurosurg 52: 625–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Born JD (1988) The Glasgow-Liège Scale. Prognostic value and evaluation of motor response and brain stem reflexes after severe head injury. Acta Neurochir 95: 49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Alexandre A, Rizzuto N (1977) Decerebrate rigidity in acute head injury. J Neurosurg 47: 680–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ivan LP (1973) Spinal reflexes in cerebral death. Neurology 23: 650–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marion DW, Carlier PM (1994) Problems with initial Glasgow Coma Scale assessment caused by prehospital treatment of patients with head injuries: results of a national survey. J Trauma 36: 89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray LS, Teasdale GM, Murray GD, et al (1993) Does prediction of outcome alter patient management? Lancet 341: 1487–1491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhatty GB, Kapoor N (1993) The Glasgow Coma Scale: a mathematical critique. Acta Neurochir 120: 132–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jagger J, Jane JA, Rimel R (1983) The Glasgow coma scale: to sum or not to sum? Lancet 2: 97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bozza Marrubini M (1984) Classifications of coma. Intensive Care Med 10: 217–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B, Murray L, Murray G (1983) Glasgow coma scale: to sum or not to sum. Lancet 2: 678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Segatore M, Way C (1992) The Glasgow Coma Scale: time for change. Heart Lung 21: 548–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stanczak DE, White JG 3rd, Gouview WD, et al (1984) Assessment of level of consciousness following severe neurological insult. A comparison of the psychometric qualities of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Comprehensive Level of Consciousness Scale. J Neurosurg 60: 955–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Crosby L, Parsons LC (1989) Clinical neurologic assessment tool: development and testing of an instrument to index neurologic status. Heart Lung 18: 121–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bouzarth WF (1968) Neurosurgical watch sheet for craniocerebral trauma. J Trauma 8: 29–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salcman M, Schepp RS, Ducker TB (1981) Calculated recovery rates in severe head trauma. Neurosurgery 8: 301–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Born JD (1988) The Glasgow-Liège Scale (GLS). Act Neurochir (Wien) 91: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Starmark JE, Stalhammar D, Holmgren E, Rosander B (1988) The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 91: 12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Benzer A, Mitterschiffthaler G, Marosi M, et al. (1991) Prediction of non-survival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma Scale. Lancet 338: 977–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    De’Clari F (1991) Innsbruck coma scale. Lancet 338: 1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sugiura K, Muraoka K, Chishiki T, Baba M (1983) The Edinburgh-2 coma scale: a new scale for assessing impaired consciousness. Neurosurgery 12: 411–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rowley G, Fielding K (1991) Reliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users. Lancet 337: 535–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B (1976) Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 34: 45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Teasdale G (1975) Acute impairment of brain function-1. Assessing `conscious level’. Nurs Times 71: 914–917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marshall LF, Becker DP, Bowers SA, et al. (1983) The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 1: Design, purpose, goals, and results. J Neurosurg 59: 276–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grahm TW, Williams FC Jr, Harrington T, Spetzler RF (1990) Civilian gunshot wounds to the head: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 27: 696–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Meredith W, Rutledge R, Fakhry SM, Emery S, Kromhout-Schiro S (1998) The conundrum of the Glasgow Coma Scale in intubated patients: a linear regression prediction of the Glasgow verbal score from the Glasgow eye and motor scores. J Trauma 44: 839–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Majerus S, Van der Linden M, Shiel A (2000) Wessex Head Injury Matrix and Glasgow/Glasgow-Liège Coma Scale: A validation and comparison study. Neuropsych Rehab 10: 167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ansell BJ, Keenan JE (1989) The Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile: A tool for assessing slow to recover head injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70: 104–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bernat JL (1992) The boundaries of the persistent vegetative state. J Clin Ethics 3: 176–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Crossman J, Bankes M, Bhan A, Crockard HA (1998) The Glasgow Coma Score: reliable evidence? Injury 29: 435–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Laureys
  • S. Majerus
  • G. Moonen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations