Advertisement

The Collection of Survey Data on Household Structures

  • Jenny de Jong Gierveld
Chapter
Part of the The Plenum Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE)

Abstract

Nowadays, survey research is one of the main tools for investigating characteristics of the size and composition of households. Some of the methodological aspects of surveys are dealt with, such as the definitions and operationalizations of key household concepts, the possibilities for using complex routing procedures, and the choice between cross-sectional surveys using retrospective questions and panel designs to collect dynamic household data. Two Dutch examples of recent survey research into households are presented and compared on the possibilities to observe ‘new’, still infrequent types of living arrangements: Living Apart Together (LAT) relationships among the elderly.

Keywords

Living Arrangement Household Type Household Structure Reference Person Consensual Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bethlehem, J.G., & A.J. Hundepool (1992), Integrated Statistical Information Processing on Microcomputers, Paper for the IUSSP/NIDI Expert Meeting on Demographic Software and Computing, NIDI, The Hague, 29 June-3 July 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Burch, T.K., & B.J. Matthews (1987), Household Formation in Developed Societies, Popula-tion and Development Review, Vol. 13 (3), pp. 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, J.C., & A.G. Hill (1988), Recent developments using micro-approaches to demo-graphic research. In: J.C. Caldwell & V.J. Hun (eds.) Micro-approaches to Demo-graphic Research, Kegan Paul International: London.Google Scholar
  4. Claiuce, L. (1992), Children’s Family Circumstances: Recent Trends in Great Britain, European Journal of Population, Vol. 8 (4), pp. 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Courgeau, D., & E Lelièver (1989), Analyse Démographique des Biographies, Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques: Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Cbs (1992), Huishoudens 1989: Sociaal-Demografische Ciffers, Resultaten uit het Woning-behoeftenonderzoek 1989/1990, CBS: Voorburg.Google Scholar
  7. Croft, T. (1992), The Integrated System for Survey Analysis (ISSA): Design Principles behind the Development of ISSA, Paper prepared for the IUSSP/NIDI Expert Meeting on Demo-graphic Software and Computing, NIDI, The Hague, 29 June-3 July 1992.Google Scholar
  8. De Feuter, H. (1991), Voorlopers bij Demografische Veranderingen, NIDI Report 22, NIDI: The Hague.Google Scholar
  9. De Jong Gierveld, J., A.C. Liefbroer & E Beekink (1991), The Effect of Parental Resources on Patterns of Leaving Home among Young Adults in the Netherlands, European Sociological Review, Vol. 7 (1), pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
  10. Dooghe, G. (1992), De Bevolkingsveroudering binnen de Europese Gemeenschap, De Gids op Maatschappelijk Gebied, Vol. 83 (1), pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  11. Du Bois-Reymond, M. (1992), Pluraliseringstendensen en Onderhandelingsculturen in het Gezin, Paper for the Sociaal-Wetenschappelijke Studiedagen 1992, ‘Culturen en Identiteiten’, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Ermisch, J. (1988), An Economic Perspective on Household Modelling. In: N.W. Keilman, A. Kuusten & A. Vossen (eds.) Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution, Clarendon Press: Oxford, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
  13. Freedman, D., A. Thornton, D. Camburn, D. Alwin & L. Young-De Marco (1988), The Life History Calendar: a Technique for Collecting Retrospective Data. In: C.C. Clogg (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1988, American Sociological Association: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Hohn, C. (1987), The Family Life Cycle: Needed Extensions of the Concept. In: J. BONGAARTS, T.K. Burch & K.W. WACHTER (eds.), Family Demography: methods and their application, Clarendon Press: Oxford, pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
  15. Kaufmann, K., & P. Schmidt (1976), Theoretische Integration der Hypothesen zur Erklärung der Diffusion von Innovationen durch Anwendung einer allgemeinen kognitiv-hedonistischen Verhaltenstheorie. In: P. Schmidt (ed.) Innovation, Hamburg, pp. 313–386.Google Scholar
  16. Keilman, N. (1985), De Opzet van een Longitudinale Relatie-en Gezinsvormingsurvey, Internal Report 39, NIDI: The Hague.Google Scholar
  17. Keilman, N.W. (1988), Dynamic Household Models. In: N.W. Keilman, A. Kuusten & A. Vossen (eds.) Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution, Clarendon Press: Oxford, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar
  18. Kluzing, F. (1988), Household Data from Surveys Containing Information for Individuals. In: N.W. Keilman, A. Kuusten & A. Vossen (eds.) Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution, Clarendon Press: Oxford, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  19. Laslett, P., & R. Wall (eds.) (1972), Household and Family in Past Time, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lesthaeghe, R. (1991), The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: an Interpretation, IPD Working Paper, Free University of Brussels.Google Scholar
  21. Linke, W. (1991), Statistics on Households and Families in the Member Countries of the Council of Europe: Definitions, Methods and Sources, INSEE Méthodes, Vol. 8, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
  22. Mcneyying, R., R.R. Wilk & E.J. Arnould (eds.) (1984), Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group,University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Meuer, L. (1990), Studiesnelheid van Universitaire Studenten: een Empirisch Onderzoek naar de Invloed van Individuele en Sociale Factoren op de Studiesnelheid van Universitaire Studenten, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Faculteit Bestuurskunde, Universiteit Twente: Enschede.Google Scholar
  24. Pageau, M., P. Cerland & N. Mcgirr (1992), Data Processing Strategies: Hardware and Software for Data Entry Editing and Tabulating. Paper for the IUSSP/NIDI Expert Meeting on Demographic Software and Micro-computing, NIDI, The Hague, 29 June-3 July 1992.Google Scholar
  25. Rogers, E.E., & F.F. Shoemaker (1971), Communication of Innovations,New York.Google Scholar
  26. Rogers, E.E., & D.L. Ice icAiD (1981), Communication Networks,New York.Google Scholar
  27. Rossi, P.H., J.D. Wiught & A.B. Anderson (1983), Sample Surveys: History, Current Practice and Future Prospects. In: P.H. Rossi, J.D. Wright & A.B. Anderson (eds.) Handbook of Survey Research, Academic Press: London, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Ryder, N.B. (1985), Recent Developments in the Formal Demography of the Family. In: International Population Conference, Florence, 1985, Vol. 3, IUSSP: Liège, pp. 207–220.Google Scholar
  29. Selltiz, C., M. Jahoda, M. Deutsh & S.W. Cool((1961), Research Methods in Social Relations,Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  30. Sikkel, D. (1985), Models for Memory Effects, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 80, pp. 835–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sudmon, S., & N.M. Bradburn (1982), Asking Questions, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.Google Scholar
  32. Van Imhoff, E., &N.W. Keilman (1991), LIPRO 2.0: An Application of a Dynamic Demographic Projection Model to Household Structure in the Netherlands, NIDI CBGS Publications 23, Swets & Zeitlinger: Amsterdam/Lisse.Google Scholar
  33. Wall, R., J. Robin & P. Laslerr (1983), Family Forms in Historic Europe, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wall, R. (1989), Leaving Home and Living Alone: an Historical Perspective, Population Studies, Vol. 43, pp. 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wall, R. (1991), European Family and Household Systems, Historiens et Populations, Société Belge de Démographie, pp. 617–636.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenny de Jong Gierveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI)The HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations