On the basis of the results of the 1984 Voorburg workshop mentioned in chapter 1, several years ago Keilman and Keyfitz sketched a number of elements of a research strategy “which should ultimately lead to a better performance and therefore a greater usefulness of household models” (Keilman and Keyfitz 1988). Since then, some of Keilman and Keyfitz’ wishes have been fulfilled, or have at least shown considerable progress, while other components have been neglected or have until now proved to be resistant against research ingenuity.
KeywordsHousing Market Parental Home Multidimensional Model Demographic Model Female Labour Supply
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bartlema, J. and A. Vossen, (1988) Reflections on Household Modelling. In: KEILMAN, KUUSTEN and VOSSEN (eds.).Google Scholar
- Keilman, N., A. Kuusten and A. Vossen (eds.), (1988), Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution, Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Keilman, N., and N. Keyfitz, (1988), Recurrent Issues in Dynamic Household Modelling. In: Keilman, Kuusten and Vossen (eds.).Google Scholar
- Ryder, N., (1992) The Centrality of Time in the Study of the Family. In: E. Berquä and P. Xenos (eds.), Family Systems and Cultural Change, Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Willekens, F., (1988) A Life Course Perspective on Household Dynamics. In: Keliman Kuusten and Vossen (eds.).Google Scholar
- Willekens, F., (1991) Understanding the Interdependence between Parallel Careers. In: J. Siegers, J. de Jong Gierveld and E. van Imhoff (eds.), Female Labour Market Behaviour and Fertility: A Rational-Choice Approach, Springer-Verlag: Berlin.Google Scholar