Advertisement

Family Violence in Cross-Cultural Perspective

  • David Levinson

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to review and discuss the contributions cross-cultural studies have made or might make to our understanding of family violence. To cover as much territory as possible I have defined cross-cultural studies broadly to include any information collection and analysis approach that involves either the implicit or explicit comparison of two or more cultural groups. Cultural group is defined broadly as well, to include nations, political subdivisions within nations, ethnic groups, small-scale (primitive, nonliterate) societies, peasant societies, and so on. Following the work of Gelles and Straus (1979) family violence is defined as the action of a family member that will very likely cause physical pain to another family member. The term beating, such as wife beating or husband beating, is used throughout the chapter to refer to any violent act ranging from a slap to a beating with a stick to murder with a handgun.

Keywords

Child Abuse Nuclear Family Family Violence Physical Punishment Female Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R. N. (1960). An inquiry into the nature of the family. In R. L. Carneiro and S. E. Dole (Eds), Essays in the science of culture (pp. 30–49 ). New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, D. (1956). The social structure of grandparenthood. American Anthropology, 58, 656–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, L., and Straus, M. A. (1985). Legitimate violence and rape: A test of the cultural spillover theory. Unpublished paper, Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, H. III. (1957). Relationship between child training and the pictorial arts. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54,380–383.Google Scholar
  5. Blum, R. H. (1969). Society and drugs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Bohannan, P. (1968). An alternative residence classification. In P. Bohannan and J. Middleton (Eds), Marriage, family, and residence (pp. 317–323 ). Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braude, G. J., and Greene, S. J. (1983). Cross-cultural codes on husband—wife relationships. Ethnology, 22, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burbank, V. K. (in press). Female aggression in cross-cultural perspective. Behavior Science Research. Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, J. C. (1980). A cultural-consistency theory of family violence in Mexican-American and Jewish-ethnic groups. In M. A. Straus and G. T. Hotaling (Eds.), The social causes of husband-wife violence (pp. 68–85 ). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, T. (1977). Wife beating: A recurring phenomenon throughout history. In M. Roy (Ed.), Battered women (pp. 2–34 ). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  11. deSilva, W. (1981). Some cultural and economic factors leading to neglect, abuse and violence in respect to children within the family in Sri Lanka. Child Abuse and Neglect, 5, 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: The Free Press. Erchak, G. M. (1984). Cultural anthropology and spouse abuse. Current Anthropology, 25, 331–332.Google Scholar
  13. Erlich, V. S. (1966). Family in transition: A study of 300 Yugoslav villages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Claredon Press. Ferraro, K. J. (1983). Rationalizing violence: How battered women stay. Victimology: An International Journal, 8, 203–214.Google Scholar
  15. Gelles, R. J., and Cornell, C. P. (1983). International perspectives on family violence. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  16. Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, I. Nye, and I. Reiss, (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol 1, pp. 549–581 ). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gibbs, J. L. Jr. (1984). On cultural anthropology and spouse abuse. Current Anthropology, 25, 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Justinger, J. M. (1978). Reaction to change: A holocultural test of some theories of religious movements (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1978 ). Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  19. Kalmuss, D. S., and Straus, M. A. (1982). Wife’s marital dependency and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiev, A. (1960). Primitive therapy: A cross-cultural study of the relationship between child training and therapeutic practices related to illness. Psychoanalytic study of society, 1, 185–217.Google Scholar
  21. Korbin, J. (1977). Anthropological contributions to the study of child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 1, 7–24. Korbin, J. E. (1981). Child abuse and neglect: Cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kumagai, F. (1983). Filial violence in Japan. Victimology: An International Journal, 8, 173–194Google Scholar
  23. Kunstadter, P. (1963). A survey of the consanguine or matrifocal family. American Anthropologist, 65, 56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambert, W. W., Triandis, L. M., and Wolf, M. (1959). Some correlates of beliefs in the malevolence and benevolence of supernatural beings: A cross-societal study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leach, E. R. (1961). Rethinking anthropology. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, G. R. (1984). The utility of cross-cultural data. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 519–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lester, D. (1980). A cross-culture study of wife abuse. Aggressive Behavior, 6, 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levinson, D. (1979). Population density in cross-cultural perspective. American Ethnologist, 6, 742–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levinson, D. (1981). Physical punishment of children and wife beating in cross-cultural perspective. Child abuse and neglect, 5, 193–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loening, W. (1981). Child abuse among the Zulus: A people in transition. Child Abuse and Neglect, 5, 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lozios, P. (1978). Violence and the family: Some Mediterranean examples. In J. P. Martin (Ed.), Violence and the family (pp. 183–196 ). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Mahmood, T. (1977). Child abuse in Arabia, India and the West-Comparative legal aspects. In J. M. Eekelaar and S. N. Katz (Eds.), Family violence: An international and interdisciplinary study (pp. 281–289 ). Toronto: Butlerworths.Google Scholar
  33. Mair, L. P. (1940). Native marriage in Buganda. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco: Glide Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Masamura, W. T. (1979). Wife abuse and other forms of aggression. Victimology: An International Journal, 4, 46–59.Google Scholar
  36. Mascia-Lees, F. E. (1984). Toward a model of women’s status. New York: Peter Long.Google Scholar
  37. Minturn, L., and Lambert, W. (1964). The antecedents of child training: A cross-cultural test of some hypotheses. In L. Minturn and W. Lambert (Eds.), Mothers of six cultures (pp. 343–346 ). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  38. Minturn, L., Grosse, M., and Haider, S. (1969) Cultural patterning of sexual beliefs and behaviors. Ethnology, 8, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muratorio, B. (1981). Protestantism, ethnicity, and class in Chimborazo. In N. E. Whitten (Ed.), Cultural transformations and ethnicity in modern Ecuador (pp. 506–534 ). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Naroll, R. (1969). Cultural determinants and the concept of the sick society. In S. C. Plog and R. G. Edgerton (Eds.), Changing perspectives in mental illness (pp. 128–155 ). New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
  42. Naroll, R. (1973). The culture-bearing unit in cross-cultural surveys. In R. Naroll and R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 721–765 ). New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  43. Nimkoff, M. F. (1965). Types of family: The social system and the family. In M. F. Nimkoff (Ed.), Com-parative family systems (pp. 12–60 ). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  44. Nkpa, M. K. V. (1981). Social change and the problems of parent abuse in a developing country. Victimology: An international journal, 6, 167–174.Google Scholar
  45. Otterbein, C. S., and Otterbein, K. (1973). Believers and beaters: A case study of supernatural beliefs and child rearing in the Bahama Islands. American Anthropologist, 75, 1670–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Otterbein, K. F. (1965). Caribbean family organization: A comparative analysis. American Anthropologist, 67, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pastemak, B., Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (1976). On the conditions favoring extended family households. Journal of Anthropological Research, 32, 109–123.Google Scholar
  48. Petersen, L. R., Lee, G. R., and Ellis, G. J. (1982). Social structure, socialization values, and disciplinaryGoogle Scholar
  49. techniques: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 131–142.Google Scholar
  50. Prescott, J.W. (1975). Body pleasure and the origins of violence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 31,10–20.Google Scholar
  51. Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. (1965). The Tibetan family system. In M. F. Nimkoff (Ed.), Comparative family systems (pp. 192–208 ). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  52. Prothro, E. T. (1960). Patterns of permissiveness among preliterate peoples. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 151–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pryor, F. L. (1977). The origins of economy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rohner, R. P. (1975). They love me, they love me not: A worldwide study of the effects of parental acceptance and rejection. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
  55. Russell, E. W. (1972). Factors of human aggression: A cross-cultural factor analysis of characteristics related to warfare and crime. Behavior Science Notes, 8, 275–312.Google Scholar
  56. Sanday, P. R. (1981a). Female power and male dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Sanday, P. R. (1981b). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5–27.Google Scholar
  57. Sanders, I. T. (1962). Rainbow in the rock: The people of rural Greece. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Savishinsky, J. S. (1970). Stress and nobility in an Artic community: The Hare Indians of Colville Lake, Northwest Territories (Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University, 1970 ). Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  59. Schlegel, A. (1972). Male dominance and female autonomy. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
  60. Schlegel, A. (1977). Toward a theory of sexual stratification. In A. Schlegel (Ed.), Sexual stratification (pp. 140 ). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sipes, R. G. (1973). War, sports, and aggression: An empirical test of two rival theories. American Anthropologist, 57, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Solheim, J. (1982). A cross-cultural examination of use of corporal punishment on children: A focus on Sweden and the United States. Child Abuse and Neglect, 6, 147–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spiegal, J. P. (1981). Ethnopsychiatric dimensions in family violence. In M. R. Green (Ed.), Violence and the family (pp. 79–89 ). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  64. Spiro, M. E., and D’Andrade, R. G. (1958). A cross-cultural study of some supernatural beliefs. American Anthropologist, 60, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephens, W. N. (1962). The Oedipus complex: Cross-cultural evidence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  66. Straus, M. A. (1983). Ordinary violence, child abuse, and wife-beating: What do they have in common? In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, and M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 213–234 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Straus, M. A. (June, 1985 ). Methodology of collaborative cross-national research on child abuse. Paper presented at the U.S.-Sweden Joint Seminar on Physical and Sexual Abuse of Children, Satra Burk, Sweden.Google Scholar
  68. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors; violence in the American family. New York: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  69. Tellis-Nayak, V., and Donoghue, G. O. (1982). Conjugal egalitarianism and violence across cultures. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 8, 277–290.Google Scholar
  70. White, R. B., and Comely, D. A. (1981). Navajo child abuse and neglect study: A comparative examination of abuse and neglect of Navajo children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 5, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whitehurst, R. N. (1974). Alternative family struciures and violence-reduction. In S. K. Steinmetz and M. A. Straus (Eds.), Violence in the family (pp. 315–320 ). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  72. Whiting, J. W. M. (1960). Resource mediation and learning by identification. In I. Iscoe and H. Stevenson (Eds.), Personality development in children (pp. 112–126 ). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  73. Whiting, J. W. M. (1967). Sorcery, sin, and the superego: A cross-cultural study of some mechanisms of social control. In C. Ford (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches (pp. 147–168 ). New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
  74. Whiting, J. W. M., and Child, I. L. (1953). Child training and personality: A cross-cultural study. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Whiting, J. W. M., and Whiting, B. B. (1976). Aloofness and intimacy of husbands and wives: A cross-cultural study. In T. Schwartz (Ed.), Socialization as communication (pp. 91–115 ). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  76. Whyte, M. K. (1978a). The status of women in preindustrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Whyte, M. K. (1978b). Cross-cultural codes dealing with the relative status of women. Ethnology, 17, 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wolfgang, M. E., and Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence: Towards an integrated theory of criminology. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  79. Wright, G. C. (1970). Projection and displacement: A cross-cultural study of folktale aggression. In D. R. Price-Williams (Ed.), Cross-cultural studies (pp. 348–360 ). Baltimore, MD: Penguin.Google Scholar
  80. Yllo, K. (1983). Sexual equality and violence against wives in American states. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 67–86.Google Scholar
  81. Yllo, K. (1984). The status of women, marital equality and violence against wives. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zelman, E. A. (1974). Women’s rights and women’s rites: A cross-cultural study of woman power and reproductive ritual (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Michigan, 1974 ). Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Levinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Relations Area Files, Inc.New HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations