Abstract
The presentation of the behavior analysis approach for the teaching of creativity to preschool children requires many subtopics. As a starting point, it will be a fruitful exercise to delineate the obvious differences between the behavior analysis and traditional approaches to training creativity so the reader may be aware of the path to be taken. Before trod-ding down this path, mention will be made of some other professionals who share with behavior analysts a belief in the early training of creativity, though they have chosen to take different paths.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baer, D. M., Rowbury, T. G., & Goetz, E. M. (1976). The preschool as a behavioral trap: A proposal for research (pp. 3—
Minnesota Symposium on Learning. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Baker, J. E., & Winston, A. S. (1985). Children’s creative drawing: Experimental analysis and social validation of a self-instructional procedure. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 115–132.
Ballard, K. D., & Glynn, T. (1975). Behavioral self-management in story-writing with elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 387–398.
Berliner, D. C. (1985). Effective classroom teaching: The necessary but not sufficient condition for developing exemplary schools. In G. R. Austin & H. Garber (Eds.), Research on exemplary schools (pp. 127–151 ). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Bijou, S. W. (1976). Child development: The basic stage of early childhood. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). ( 1985 ). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
Bushell, D., Jr., & Dorsey, D. (1985). Behavioral models of teaching. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlewaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 437–442 ). New York: Pergamon.
Day, W. F. (1969). On certain similarities between the philosophical investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the operationism of B. F. Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 489–506.
Della-Piana, G. M. (1978). Research strategies for the study of revision processes in writing poetry. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 105–134 ). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Elliott, C., & Goetz, E. M. (1971). Creative blockbuilding as a function of social reinforcement using an unrestrictive creativity code. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.
Fallon, M. P., & Goetz, E. M. (1975). The creative teacher: The effects of descriptive social reinforcement upon the drawing behavior of three preschool children. School Applications of Learning Theory, 7 (2), 27–45.
Figgs, S., & Herbert, E. (1971). The effects of training, primes and social reinforcement on creativity in blockbuilding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.
Figgs, S., Dunn, J., & Herbert, E. (1971). The effects of primes on creativity in blockbuilding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.
Flavell, J. H. (1986). The development of children’s knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. American Psychologist, 41, 418–425.
Fowler, S. A., & Baer, D. M. (1981). Do I have to be good today? The timing of delayed reinforcement as a factor in generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 1324.
Funderbunk, F. R. (1976). Reinforcement control of classroom creativity. In T. Brigham (Ed.), Behavior analysis in education: Self-control and reading (pp. 197–204 ). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor Books.
Glover, J. A., & Sautter, F. (1977). Procedures for increasing four behaviorally defined components of creativity within formal written assignments among high school students. School Applications of Learning Theory, 9, 3–22.
Goetz, E. M. (1981). The effects of minimal praise on the creative blockbuilding of three-year-olds. Child Study Journal, 11, 55–67.
Goetz, E. M. (1982a). Behavior principles and techniques. In K. E. Allen & E. M. Goetz (Eds.), Early childhood education: Special problems, special solutions (pp. 31–76 ). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
Goetz, E. M. (1982b). A review of functional analyses of preschool children’s creative behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 5, 157–177.
Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1971). Social reinforcement of creative blockbuilding by young children. In G. A. Ramp & B. L. Hopkins (Eds.), A new direction for education: Behavior analysis (pp. 72–79 ). Lawrence, KS, University of Kansas Press.
Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1973). Social control of form diversity and the emergence of new forms in children’s block-building. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 209–217.
Glover, J. A., & Gary, A. L. (1976). Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 79–84.
Goetz, E. M., & Salmonson, M. N. (1972). The effect of general and descriptive reinforcement on “creativity” in easel painting. In G. B. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 53–61 ). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Hendrick, J. (1975). The whole child: New trends in early education. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
Hendrick, J. (1980). Total learning for the whole child. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
Holman, J., Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1977). The training of creativity as an operant and an examination of its generalization characteristics. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New directions in behavioral research: Theory, methods and applications. In honor of Sidney W. Bijou (pp. 441–472 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Horowitz, F. D., & O’Brien, M. (1986). Gifted and talented children: State of knowledge and directions for research. American Psychologist, 41, 1147–1152.
Juan, S. (1985). The Yoki Gakuen: The Suzuki philosophy in the preschool. Childhood Education, 62, 38–39.
Katz, L. G. (1985). Dispositions in early childhood education. ERIC/EECE Bulletin, 18(2), 1, 3.
Kohler, F. W., & Greenwood, C. R. (1986). Toward a technology of generalization: The identification of natural contingencies of reinforcement. Behavior Analysis, 9, 19–26.
Lane, T. W., Lane, M. Z., Friedman, B. S., Goetz, E. M., & Pinkston, E. M. (1982). A creativity enhancement program for preschool children in an inner city parent-child center. In A. M. Pinkston, J. L. Levitt, G. R. Green, N. L. Linsk, & T. L. Rzepnicki (Eds.), Effective social work practice: Advanced techniques for behavioral intervention with individuals, families, and institutional staff (pp. 435–441 ). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lavatelli, C. S. (1970). Piaget’s theory applied to an early childhood curriculum. Boston: Center for Media Development. _
Maloney, K. B., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). The modification of sentence structure and its relationship to subjective judgements of creativity in writings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 6, 425–433.
Maloney, K. B., Jacobson, C. R., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). An analysis of the effects of lectures, requests, teacher praise, and free time on the creative writing behaviors of third grade children. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 244–260 ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Maltzman, I., Bogartz, W., & Breger, L. (1958). A procedure for increasing word association originality and its transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 39 2398.
Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method. New York: Schocken Books.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s.
Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Training generalized improvisation of tools by preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 363–380.
Reese, N. M., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1970). Creative dance: Pilot study. Unpublished research, University of Kansas.
Rogers-Warren, A., & Baer, D. M. (1976). Correspondence between saying and doing: Teaching children to share to praise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 335–354.
Romero, P. M., Holt, W. J., Stella, M. E., Baer, D. M., & Etzel, B. C. (1978, August). Contingency effects of reinforced and unreinforced forms: Cube design complexity. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
Ryan, B. A., & Winston, A. S. (1978). Dimensions of creativity in children’s drawings: A social validation study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 651–656.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.
Sloane, H. N., Endo, G. T., & Della-Piana, G. (1980). Creative behavior. Behavior Analyst, 3, 11–22.
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–368.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom creativity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Torrance, E. P. (1980a). Lessons about giftedness and creativity from a nation of 115 million overachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 10–14.
Torrance, E. P. (1980b). Creativity and futurism in education: Retooling. Education, 100, 298–311.
Torrance, E. P. (1982). Education for quality circles in Japanese schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15 (2), 11–15.
Wallach, M. A. (1985). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 99–123 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Winston, A. S. (1984, August). Beyond reinforcement of novelty. In A. S. Winston & E. M. Goetz (Chairs), Current issues in the study of creativity as operant behavior. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
Winston, A. S., & Baker, J. E. (1985). Behavior analytic studies of creativity: A critical review. Behavior Analyst, 8, 191205.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goetz, E.M. (1989). The Teaching of Creativity to Preschool Children. In: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Handbook of Creativity. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3212-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5356-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive