Skip to main content

The Teaching of Creativity to Preschool Children

The Behavior Analysis Approach

  • Chapter
Handbook of Creativity

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

The presentation of the behavior analysis approach for the teaching of creativity to preschool children requires many subtopics. As a starting point, it will be a fruitful exercise to delineate the obvious differences between the behavior analysis and traditional approaches to training creativity so the reader may be aware of the path to be taken. Before trod-ding down this path, mention will be made of some other professionals who share with behavior analysts a belief in the early training of creativity, though they have chosen to take different paths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer, D. M., Rowbury, T. G., & Goetz, E. M. (1976). The preschool as a behavioral trap: A proposal for research (pp. 3—

    Google Scholar 

  2. Minnesota Symposium on Learning. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, J. E., & Winston, A. S. (1985). Children’s creative drawing: Experimental analysis and social validation of a self-instructional procedure. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballard, K. D., & Glynn, T. (1975). Behavioral self-management in story-writing with elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 387–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berliner, D. C. (1985). Effective classroom teaching: The necessary but not sufficient condition for developing exemplary schools. In G. R. Austin & H. Garber (Eds.), Research on exemplary schools (pp. 127–151 ). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bijou, S. W. (1976). Child development: The basic stage of early childhood. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). ( 1985 ). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bushell, D., Jr., & Dorsey, D. (1985). Behavioral models of teaching. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlewaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 437–442 ). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Day, W. F. (1969). On certain similarities between the philosophical investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the operationism of B. F. Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Della-Piana, G. M. (1978). Research strategies for the study of revision processes in writing poetry. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 105–134 ). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott, C., & Goetz, E. M. (1971). Creative blockbuilding as a function of social reinforcement using an unrestrictive creativity code. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fallon, M. P., & Goetz, E. M. (1975). The creative teacher: The effects of descriptive social reinforcement upon the drawing behavior of three preschool children. School Applications of Learning Theory, 7 (2), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Figgs, S., & Herbert, E. (1971). The effects of training, primes and social reinforcement on creativity in blockbuilding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Figgs, S., Dunn, J., & Herbert, E. (1971). The effects of primes on creativity in blockbuilding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Flavell, J. H. (1986). The development of children’s knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. American Psychologist, 41, 418–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fowler, S. A., & Baer, D. M. (1981). Do I have to be good today? The timing of delayed reinforcement as a factor in generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Funderbunk, F. R. (1976). Reinforcement control of classroom creativity. In T. Brigham (Ed.), Behavior analysis in education: Self-control and reading (pp. 197–204 ). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Glover, J. A., & Sautter, F. (1977). Procedures for increasing four behaviorally defined components of creativity within formal written assignments among high school students. School Applications of Learning Theory, 9, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goetz, E. M. (1981). The effects of minimal praise on the creative blockbuilding of three-year-olds. Child Study Journal, 11, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goetz, E. M. (1982a). Behavior principles and techniques. In K. E. Allen & E. M. Goetz (Eds.), Early childhood education: Special problems, special solutions (pp. 31–76 ). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goetz, E. M. (1982b). A review of functional analyses of preschool children’s creative behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 5, 157–177.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1971). Social reinforcement of creative blockbuilding by young children. In G. A. Ramp & B. L. Hopkins (Eds.), A new direction for education: Behavior analysis (pp. 72–79 ). Lawrence, KS, University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1973). Social control of form diversity and the emergence of new forms in children’s block-building. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 209–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Glover, J. A., & Gary, A. L. (1976). Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goetz, E. M., & Salmonson, M. N. (1972). The effect of general and descriptive reinforcement on “creativity” in easel painting. In G. B. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 53–61 ). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hendrick, J. (1975). The whole child: New trends in early education. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hendrick, J. (1980). Total learning for the whole child. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holman, J., Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1977). The training of creativity as an operant and an examination of its generalization characteristics. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New directions in behavioral research: Theory, methods and applications. In honor of Sidney W. Bijou (pp. 441–472 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Horowitz, F. D., & O’Brien, M. (1986). Gifted and talented children: State of knowledge and directions for research. American Psychologist, 41, 1147–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Juan, S. (1985). The Yoki Gakuen: The Suzuki philosophy in the preschool. Childhood Education, 62, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Katz, L. G. (1985). Dispositions in early childhood education. ERIC/EECE Bulletin, 18(2), 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kohler, F. W., & Greenwood, C. R. (1986). Toward a technology of generalization: The identification of natural contingencies of reinforcement. Behavior Analysis, 9, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lane, T. W., Lane, M. Z., Friedman, B. S., Goetz, E. M., & Pinkston, E. M. (1982). A creativity enhancement program for preschool children in an inner city parent-child center. In A. M. Pinkston, J. L. Levitt, G. R. Green, N. L. Linsk, & T. L. Rzepnicki (Eds.), Effective social work practice: Advanced techniques for behavioral intervention with individuals, families, and institutional staff (pp. 435–441 ). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lavatelli, C. S. (1970). Piaget’s theory applied to an early childhood curriculum. Boston: Center for Media Development. _

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maloney, K. B., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). The modification of sentence structure and its relationship to subjective judgements of creativity in writings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 6, 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maloney, K. B., Jacobson, C. R., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). An analysis of the effects of lectures, requests, teacher praise, and free time on the creative writing behaviors of third grade children. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 244–260 ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Maltzman, I., Bogartz, W., & Breger, L. (1958). A procedure for increasing word association originality and its transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 39 2398.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Training generalized improvisation of tools by preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 363–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Reese, N. M., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1970). Creative dance: Pilot study. Unpublished research, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rogers-Warren, A., & Baer, D. M. (1976). Correspondence between saying and doing: Teaching children to share to praise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Romero, P. M., Holt, W. J., Stella, M. E., Baer, D. M., & Etzel, B. C. (1978, August). Contingency effects of reinforced and unreinforced forms: Cube design complexity. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ryan, B. A., & Winston, A. S. (1978). Dimensions of creativity in children’s drawings: A social validation study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 651–656.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Sloane, H. N., Endo, G. T., & Della-Piana, G. (1980). Creative behavior. Behavior Analyst, 3, 11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Torrance, E. P. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom creativity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Torrance, E. P. (1980a). Lessons about giftedness and creativity from a nation of 115 million overachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Torrance, E. P. (1980b). Creativity and futurism in education: Retooling. Education, 100, 298–311.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Torrance, E. P. (1982). Education for quality circles in Japanese schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15 (2), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wallach, M. A. (1985). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 99–123 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Winston, A. S. (1984, August). Beyond reinforcement of novelty. In A. S. Winston & E. M. Goetz (Chairs), Current issues in the study of creativity as operant behavior. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Winston, A. S., & Baker, J. E. (1985). Behavior analytic studies of creativity: A critical review. Behavior Analyst, 8, 191205.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goetz, E.M. (1989). The Teaching of Creativity to Preschool Children. In: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Handbook of Creativity. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3212-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5356-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics