Abstract
The interest in ideas and where they come from is an old one, dating back at least to pre-Socratic philosophers and continuing to the present-day theories of creative thinking. The question of where ideas come from has been answered in a variety of ways: ideas can come from the gods, from the imagination, from a mind trained in reasoning, from a haphazard association of memories, from stimulating images, from a subconscious bank of archetypes, from memories transformed by mental schemata, and from attempts to solve problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications ( 2nd ed. ). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Atwell, M. ( 1981, November). The evolution of text: The interrelationship of reading and writing in the composing process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Boston, MA.
Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockart’s framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139–152.
Bartlett, E. J. (1982). Learning to revise: Some component processes. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 345363 ). New York: Academic Press.
Benton, S. L., Kraft, R. G., Glover, J. A., and Plake, B. S. (1984). Cognitive capacity differences among writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 820–834.
Bereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. In W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 7393 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 1–64 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Birnbaum, J. C. (1982). The reading and composing behaviors of selected fourth-and seventh-grade students. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 241–260.
Bracewell, R. J., Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. ( 1979, April). A test of two myths about revision. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Bridwell, L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth-grade students’ transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197–222.
Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., and Smith, J. W. (1985). Cognitive demands of processing expository text: A cognitive workbench model. In B. K. Britton and J. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 227–248 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., and Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan.
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Burns, M. H. (1984). Recollections of first-generation computer-assisted prewriting. In W. Wresch (Ed.), The computer in composition instruction (pp. 15–33 ). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Caccamise, D. J. (1981). Cognitive processes in writing: Idea generation and integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
Chafe, W. (1977). The recall and verbalization of past experience. In R. W. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 215–246 ). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Cohen, E., and Scardamalia, M. (1983, April). The effects of instructional intervention in the revision of essays by grade six children Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
Collins, A., and Gentner, D. (1980). A framework for a cognitive theory of writing. In E. R. Steinberg and L. W. Gregg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cooper, C. and Matsuhashi, A. (1983). A theory of the writing process. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 339 ). New York: Wiley.
Cooper, M. (1984). The pragmatics of form: How do writers discover what to do when? In R. Beach and L. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 109–126 ). London: Guilford.
Cropley, A. J. (1970). S-R psychology and cognitive psychology. In P. E. Vemon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 116–125 ). Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Pengu in Books.
Daiute, C. A. (1980). A psycholinguistic study of writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Daiute, C. A. (1981). Psycholinguistic foundations of the writing process. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 5–22.
Daiute, C. (1984). Performance limits on writers. In R. Beach and L. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 205–224 ). London: Guilford.
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Faigley, L., and Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400–414.
Flower, L. S. (1981). Problem-solving strategies for writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Flower, L. S., and Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32.
Freedman, S. (1982). The student teacher writer conference: Key techniques. Journal of English Teaching Techniques, 12, 38–45.
Gagné, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown.
Glover, J. A. (1979). The effectiveness of reinforcement and practice for enhancing the creative writing of elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 487.
Glover, J. A., and Gary, A. L. (1976). Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 79–84.
Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Muth, K. D., and Dogan, N. (1982). Writing and revising persuasive documents: Cognitive demands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 557567.
Goodman, D., and Goodman, Y. (1978). Reading of American children whose language is a stable rural dialect or a language other than English. (Final Report, Contract No. 100–30087 ). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Graesser, A. (1984). The impact of different information sources on idea generation: Writing off the top of our heads. Written Communications, 1, 341–365.
Gregg, L. W., and Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.). (1980). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Harste, J. C., Burke, C. L., and Woodward, V. A. (1982). Children’s language and the world: Initial encounters with print. In J. A. Langer and M. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author: Bridging the gap (pp. 105–131 ). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hayes, J. R., and Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, D. M., Parrott, G. L., and Stratten, R. P. (1968). Production and judgment of solutions to five problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59 ( Monograph Suppl. No. 6 ).
Johnston, W. A., and Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 420–435.
Kean, D. K., Glynn, S. M., and Britton, B. K. (1987). Writing persuasive documents: The role of students’ verbal aptitude and evaluation anxiety. Journal of Experimental Education, 55, 95–102.
Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory and Cognition, 15, 256–266.
Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kintsch, W. ( 1980, July). Psychological processes in discourse production. Paper presented at the workshop on “Psycho-linguistic Models of Production,” University of Kassel, West Germany.
Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3 (2), 87–108.
Kroll, B. M. (1978). Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 269–281.
Langer, J. (1984). The effects of available information on responses to school writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 27–44.
Martlew, M. (1983). The development of writing: Communication and cognition. In F. Coulmas and K. Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 257–275 ). New York: Mouton Publishers.
Moffett, J. (1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., and Simon, H. (1963). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado (pp. 63–119 ). New York: Atherton Press.
Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Giron (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Odell, L. (1974). Measuring the effect of instruction in prewriting. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 228–240.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribners.
Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Pianko, S. (1979). A description of the composing processes of college freshmen writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5–22.
Rose, M. (1984). Writer’s block: The cognitive dimension. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Scardamalia, M. (1981). How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing. In C. H. Frederiksen and J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2, pp. 81–103 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children’s composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67–95 ). New York: Wiley.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., and Goelman, H. (1982). The role of productive factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language process and structure of writers discourse (pp. 173–210 ). New York: Academic Press.
Stallard, C. K. (1974). An analysis of the writing behavior of good student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 206–218.
Tetroe, J. ( 1984, April). Information processing demand of plot construction in story writing. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
van Dijk, T. A., and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T. V., and Spilich, G. J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–667.
Wason, P. C. (1978). Specific thoughts on the writing process. Paper presented at the Cognitive Processes in Writing—Interdisciplinary Symposium on Cognition, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Young, R. (1976). Invention: A topographical survey. In G. Tate (Ed.), Teaching composition: 10 bibliographical essays (pp. 1–43). Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University. Young, R. (1981). Problems and the composing process. In C. H. Frederiksen and J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2, pp. 59–66 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Looney, J.A., Glynn, S.M., Britton, B.K., Mattocks, L.F. (1989). Cognition and Writing. In: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Handbook of Creativity. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3212-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5356-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive