Skip to main content

Cognition and Writing

The Idea Generation Process

  • Chapter
Handbook of Creativity

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

The interest in ideas and where they come from is an old one, dating back at least to pre-Socratic philosophers and continuing to the present-day theories of creative thinking. The question of where ideas come from has been answered in a variety of ways: ideas can come from the gods, from the imagination, from a mind trained in reasoning, from a haphazard association of memories, from stimulating images, from a subconscious bank of archetypes, from memories transformed by mental schemata, and from attempts to solve problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications ( 2nd ed. ). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwell, M. ( 1981, November). The evolution of text: The interrelationship of reading and writing in the composing process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockart’s framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, E. J. (1982). Learning to revise: Some component processes. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 345363 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, S. L., Kraft, R. G., Glover, J. A., and Plake, B. S. (1984). Cognitive capacity differences among writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 820–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. In W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 7393 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 1–64 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, J. C. (1982). The reading and composing behaviors of selected fourth-and seventh-grade students. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell, R. J., Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. ( 1979, April). A test of two myths about revision. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridwell, L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth-grade students’ transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., and Smith, J. W. (1985). Cognitive demands of processing expository text: A cognitive workbench model. In B. K. Britton and J. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 227–248 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., and Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. H. (1984). Recollections of first-generation computer-assisted prewriting. In W. Wresch (Ed.), The computer in composition instruction (pp. 15–33 ). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccamise, D. J. (1981). Cognitive processes in writing: Idea generation and integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (1977). The recall and verbalization of past experience. In R. W. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 215–246 ). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., and Scardamalia, M. (1983, April). The effects of instructional intervention in the revision of essays by grade six children Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., and Gentner, D. (1980). A framework for a cognitive theory of writing. In E. R. Steinberg and L. W. Gregg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. and Matsuhashi, A. (1983). A theory of the writing process. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 339 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (1984). The pragmatics of form: How do writers discover what to do when? In R. Beach and L. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 109–126 ). London: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (1970). S-R psychology and cognitive psychology. In P. E. Vemon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 116–125 ). Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Pengu in Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. A. (1980). A psycholinguistic study of writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. A. (1981). Psycholinguistic foundations of the writing process. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. (1984). Performance limits on writers. In R. Beach and L. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 205–224 ). London: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faigley, L., and Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S. (1981). Problem-solving strategies for writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S., and Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. (1982). The student teacher writer conference: Key techniques. Journal of English Teaching Techniques, 12, 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • GagnĂ©, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A. (1979). The effectiveness of reinforcement and practice for enhancing the creative writing of elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., and Gary, A. L. (1976). Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Muth, K. D., and Dogan, N. (1982). Writing and revising persuasive documents: Cognitive demands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 557567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., and Goodman, Y. (1978). Reading of American children whose language is a stable rural dialect or a language other than English. (Final Report, Contract No. 100–30087 ). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. (1984). The impact of different information sources on idea generation: Writing off the top of our heads. Written Communications, 1, 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, L. W., and Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.). (1980). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harste, J. C., Burke, C. L., and Woodward, V. A. (1982). Children’s language and the world: Initial encounters with print. In J. A. Langer and M. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author: Bridging the gap (pp. 105–131 ). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., and Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. M., Parrott, G. L., and Stratten, R. P. (1968). Production and judgment of solutions to five problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59 ( Monograph Suppl. No. 6 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., and Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 420–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kean, D. K., Glynn, S. M., and Britton, B. K. (1987). Writing persuasive documents: The role of students’ verbal aptitude and evaluation anxiety. Journal of Experimental Education, 55, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory and Cognition, 15, 256–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. ( 1980, July). Psychological processes in discourse production. Paper presented at the workshop on “Psycho-linguistic Models of Production,” University of Kassel, West Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3 (2), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, B. M. (1978). Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J. (1984). The effects of available information on responses to school writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martlew, M. (1983). The development of writing: Communication and cognition. In F. Coulmas and K. Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 257–275 ). New York: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, J. (1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., and Simon, H. (1963). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado (pp. 63–119 ). New York: Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Giron (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, L. (1974). Measuring the effect of instruction in prewriting. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianko, S. (1979). A description of the composing processes of college freshmen writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. (1984). Writer’s block: The cognitive dimension. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (1981). How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing. In C. H. Frederiksen and J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2, pp. 81–103 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children’s composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67–95 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., and Goelman, H. (1982). The role of productive factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language process and structure of writers discourse (pp. 173–210 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallard, C. K. (1974). An analysis of the writing behavior of good student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 206–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetroe, J. ( 1984, April). Information processing demand of plot construction in story writing. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A., and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T. V., and Spilich, G. J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C. (1978). Specific thoughts on the writing process. Paper presented at the Cognitive Processes in Writing—Interdisciplinary Symposium on Cognition, Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. (1976). Invention: A topographical survey. In G. Tate (Ed.), Teaching composition: 10 bibliographical essays (pp. 1–43). Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University. Young, R. (1981). Problems and the composing process. In C. H. Frederiksen and J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2, pp. 59–66 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Looney, J.A., Glynn, S.M., Britton, B.K., Mattocks, L.F. (1989). Cognition and Writing. In: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Handbook of Creativity. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3212-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5356-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics