Abstract
In 1988, a convicted murderer, Robert Francis, contended he had FAS and that his condition should be considered a mitigating factor in sentencing him for torturing and then shooting someone who informed against him. The psychiatrist who testified Francis had FAS, however, never tested Francis’s ability to reason. He also said Francis’s IQ was in the normal range, and he had not looked for any physical evidence of brain damage, adding he was basing his diagnosis solely on Francis’s facial characteristics (Francis a State, 1988). Because he believed Francis had facial features compatible with the syndrome, the psychiatrist felt that there was no need for tests, no need to prove a history of prenatal alcohol exposure, no need to determine Francis’s growth history, and no need to determine his cognitive abilities. He simply assumed anyone with FAS facial features must be brain damaged, and, therefore, that person’s ability to control violent behavior must also be impaired.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abel, E.L. (1998). Craniofacial Anomalies. In: Fetal Alcohol Abuse Syndrome. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5217-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5217-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3280-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5217-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive