Advertisement

Operations Research Contributions to Evaluation of R&D Projects

  • Stuart Bretschneider
Chapter

Abstract

Over the past forty years, the field of Operations Research has applied the “scientific method” towards the solution of practical problems faced by modem organizations. Operations Research has developed techniques for analyzing and prescribing actions in a wide array of problems areas. The core of these techniques include a series of model which focus on resource allocation, scheduling and selection decisions. Many of these models have been applied to the management of R & D projects.

Keywords

IEEE Transaction Data Envelopment Analysis Analytic Hierarchy Process Research Management Efficient Frontier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaker, D., and Tyebjee, T. 1978. “A model for the selection of interdependent R and D projects.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 25, pp. 2.Google Scholar
  2. Albala, A. 1975. “Stage approach for the evaluation and selection of R and D projects.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 22, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, J.M., 1970. “A survey into the RandD evaluation and control procedures currently used in industry.” Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol 18, pp. 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anonymous, 1978. “Top-down and bottom-up approaches to project selection,” Research Management, March, 22–24.Google Scholar
  5. Asher, D.I., 1962. “A linear programming model for the allocation of R and D efforts.” IRE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. EM-16, pp. 2–8.Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson, A.C., and Bobis, A.H. 1969. “A mathematical basis for the selection of research projects.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 16, pp. 1:2–8.Google Scholar
  7. Augood, D.R., 1973. “A review of R and D evaluation methods.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol EM-20., pp. 4., pp. 114–120.Google Scholar
  8. Ayers, R.U., 1969. Technological Forecasting and Long-Range Planning. ( New York: McGraw Hill. )Google Scholar
  9. Baker, N. 1974. “R and D project selection models: An assessment.” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management. Vol 21, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  10. Baker, N., and Freeland, J. 1976. “Recent advances in R and D benefit measurement and project selection methods.” Management Science. 21, pp. 10.Google Scholar
  11. Baker, N.R., Siegman, J.,and Larson, J., 1971. “The relationship between certain characteristics of industrial research proposals and their subsequent disposition.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol EM-18, pp. 118–123.Google Scholar
  12. Baker, L.T., “Planning an independent research and development program,” Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Electronics Conference, Dayton, OH May 1969, 507–512.Google Scholar
  13. Baker, N.R. and Pound, W.H. 1964. “R and D project selection: Where we stand.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 11, pp. 4:124–134.Google Scholar
  14. Baker, N.R., Souder, W.E., Shumway, C.R.,Maker, P.M, and Rubenstein, A.H. 1976. “A budget allocation model for large hierarchical R and D organizations.” Management Science. 23, pp. l.Google Scholar
  15. Banker, R.D., Channes, A., Cooper, W.W., And Schinnar, A.P. 1981. “A biextremal principle for frontier estimation and efficiency evaluations.” Management Science. 27, pp. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Birnbaum, P. 1977. “Assessment of alternative management forms in academic interdisciplinary research projects.” Management Science. 24, pp. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Banker, R.D., Chames, A., and Cooper, W.W. 1984. “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis.” Management Science. 30, pp. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Banker, R.D., Conrad, R., and Strauss, R., 1986. “A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and translog methods: An illustrative study of hospital production,” Management Science. 32, pp. 1, pp. 30–44.Google Scholar
  19. Bard, J. 1985. “Parallel funding of R and D tasks with probabilistic outcomes.” Management Science. 31, pp. 7, 814–828Google Scholar
  20. Bard, J., and Feinberg, A. 1989. “A Two phase methodology for technology selection and system design.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 36, pp. l.Google Scholar
  21. Bard, J. 1986. “A Multobjective methodology for selecting subsystem automation options.” Management Science. 32 Iss:12: 1628–1641.Google Scholar
  22. Bard, J., Balachandra, R., and Kaufmann, P. 1988. “An interactive approach to R and D project selection and termination.” IEEE transactions on Engineering Management. 35 Iss: 3: 139–146.Google Scholar
  23. Beged-Dov, A.G., 1965. “Optimal assignment of research and development projects in a large company using an integer programming model,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. EM-12 Iss:12.Google Scholar
  24. Bell, D.C., et al., 1967. “Application of a research project selection method in the northern region scientific services department,” Central Electricity Generating Board (UK).Google Scholar
  25. Bessent, A., Bessent, W., Kennington, J., and Reagan, B. 1982. “An application of mathematical programming to assess productivity in the Houston independent school district.” Management Science. 28, pp. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Birnbaum, P. 1979. “A theory of academic interdisciplinary research performance: a contingency and path analysis approach.” Management Science. 25, pp. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Birnbaum, P. 1981. “Contingencies for interdisciplinary research: matching research questions with research organizations.” Management Science. 27, pp. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Blanning, R. 1983. “A sensitivity analysis of variable-base budgeting.” Management Science. 29, pp. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cooley, S., Hehmeyer, J., Sweeney, P. 1986. “Modeling R and D resource allocation.” Research Management. 29 Iss:1:40–45.Google Scholar
  30. Cetron, M.J., Martins, J., and Roepoke, L. 1967. “The selection of R and D Program content: Survey of quantitative method.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 14, pp. 1:4–13.Google Scholar
  31. Chang, Z. 1985. “The characteristics of Industrial R and D: A study of major manufacturing industries in Hong Kong.” OMEGA International Journal of Management Science. 13, pp. 6:501–506.Google Scholar
  32. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. 1981. “Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: and application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through.” Management Science. 27, pp. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Charnes, A. and Stedry, A.C., 1966. “A chance-constrained model for real-time control in research and development management.” Management Science. Vol. 12, pp. 8, pp. B353–B362.Google Scholar
  34. Charnes, A. and W. Cooper, 1961. Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Vol. 1, John Wiley and Son.Google Scholar
  35. Cochran, M.A., Pyle, E.B., Greene, L.C., Clymer, H.A., and D. Bender, 1971. “Investment model for RandD project selection and evaluation.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. EM-18, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
  36. Cohen, Jared, 1978. Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
  37. Cook, W.D. and L.M. Seifford, “ R and D Project Selection in a Multidimensional Environment: A Practical Approach,” Journal of the Operations Research Society, Vol. 33, 1982, 397–405.Google Scholar
  38. Cooper, M.J., 1978. “An evaluation system for project selection,” Research Management, Vol. 21, 29–33.Google Scholar
  39. Cooper, R. 1981. “An empirically derived new product project predicate selection model.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 28, pp. 3.Google Scholar
  40. Costello, D., 1983. “A practical approach to R and D project selection,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 23.Google Scholar
  41. Cramer, R.H. and B.E. Smith, 1964. “Decision models for the selection of research projects,” The Engineering Economist. Vol. 9:2, January-February, 1–20.Google Scholar
  42. Cranston, R. 1974. “First experiences with a ranking method for portfolio selection in applied research.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 21, pp. 4Google Scholar
  43. Daily, R. 1978. “The role of team and task characteristics in R and D team collaborative problem solving and productivity.” Management Science. 24, pp. 15.Google Scholar
  44. Danila, N. 1989. “Strategic evaluation and selection of R and D Projects.” R and D Management. 19 Iss:1:47–62.Google Scholar
  45. Davies, G., and Pearson, A. 1980. “The application of some group problem-solving approaches to project selection in Research and Development.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 27, pp. 3.Google Scholar
  46. Davis, E.W., 1966. “Resource allocation in project network models-a survey.” Journal of Industrial Engineering. Vol. 17, pp. 4, pp. 177–188.Google Scholar
  47. Dean, B.V., and S.S. Sengupta, 1962. “Research budgeting and project selection,” IRE Transaction on Engineering Management.Google Scholar
  48. Dean, B.V. and M.J. Nishry, 1965. “Scoring and profitability models for evaluating and selecting engineering projects.” Operations Research. Vol. 13, pp. 4, pp. 550–570.Google Scholar
  49. Ellis, L.W., The Financial Side of Industrial Research Management, John Wiley and Son, 1984.Google Scholar
  50. Dean, B., and Roepoke, L. 1969. “Cost effectiveness in R and D organizational resource allocation” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 16, pp. 4:222–242.Google Scholar
  51. Fahrni, P., and Spatig, M. 1990. “An application oriented guide to R and D project selection and evaluation methods.” R and D Management. 20 Iss:2:155–171.Google Scholar
  52. Farris, G. 1969. “Some antecedents and consequences of scientific performance.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 16, pp. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Feller, I. 1980. “Managerial response to technological innovation in public sector organizations.” Management Science. 26, pp. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fox, E., and Baker, N. 1985. “Project selection decision making linked to a dynamic environment.” Management Science. 31 Iss:10:1272–1285.Google Scholar
  55. Fox, G., Baker,N., and Bryant, J. 1984. “Economic models for R and D project selection in the presence of project interactions.” Management Science. 30, pp. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Goretsky, E. 1987. “When to bid for government contracts.” Industrial Marketing Management. 16 Iss:1:25–33.Google Scholar
  57. Gaver, D.P., and Srinivasan, V. 1972. “Allocating resources between research and development: A macro analysis.” Management Science. 18, pp. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gear, A.E., Lockett,A.G., and Pearson, A.W. 1971. “Analysis of some portfolio selection models for R and D.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 18, pp. 2.Google Scholar
  59. Gear, A.E. 1974. “A Review of some recent developments in portfolio modelling in applied research and development.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 21, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  60. Gee, R. 1971. “A Survey of current project selection practices.” Research Management.Google Scholar
  61. Golabi, K., Kirkwood, C., and Sicherman, A. 1981. “Selecting a portfolio of solar energy projects using multiattribute preference theory.” Management Science. 27, pp. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Golabi, K. 1985. “Selecting a portfolio of nonhomogeneous R and D proposals.” European Journal of Operational Research. 21 Iss:3:347–357.Google Scholar
  63. Goldstein, P., and Singer, H. 1986. “A note on economic models for R and D project selection in the presence of project interactions.” Management Science. 32, pp. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Graves, S. 1989. “The time cost tradeoff in research and development: a review.” Engineering Costs and Production Economics. 16 Iss:1:1–9.Google Scholar
  65. Grossman, D., and Gupta, S. 1974. “Dynamic time staged model for R and D portfolio planning: A real world case ” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 21, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  66. Gustafson, D.H., G.K. Pai and G.C. Kramer, 1971. “ A weighted aggregate approach to R and D project selection,” AIIE Transactions. Vol. 3, pp. 1, 22–30.Google Scholar
  67. Hadley, G., 1963. Linear Programming, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  68. Hall,D., and Nauda, A. 1988. “A strategic methodology for IR and D project selection.” IEEE Engineering Management Conference Engineering Leadership in the 90’s. Oct. 24. Dayton.Google Scholar
  69. Helin, A., and Souder, W. 1974. “Experimental test of a q-sort procedure for prioritizing R and D projects.” IEEE Transaction Engineering on Management. Vol 21, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  70. Hillier, F. and G. Lieberman, 1986. Introduction to Operations Research, Holden-Day: San Francisco.Google Scholar
  71. Hertz, D. 1964. “Risk analysis in capital investment.” Harvard Business Review. 3: 95–106.Google Scholar
  72. Hespos, R.F. and P.A. Strassman, 1965. “Stochastic decision trees for the analysis of investment decisions,” Management Science. Vol. 11, pp. 10, 244–59.Google Scholar
  73. Hess, S.W., 1962. “A dynamic programming approach to R and D budgeting and project selection.” IRE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. EM-9, pp. 170–179.Google Scholar
  74. Higgins, J.C., and Watts, K.M. 1986. “Some perspectives on the use of management science techniques in R and D management.” R and D Management. 16 Iss:4:291–296.Google Scholar
  75. Hudson, R., Chambers, J., and Johnston, R. 1977. “New product planning decisions under uncertainty.” Interfaces. 8, pp. 1 Part 2.Google Scholar
  76. Izuchukwu, J. 1990. “Project management: Shortening the critical path.” Mechanical Engineering. 112 Iss: 2:59–60.Google Scholar
  77. Jackson, B. 1983. “Decision methods for selecting a portfolio of R and D projects.” Research Management. 26, pp. 5.Google Scholar
  78. Jin, X., Porter, A., Rossini, F., and Anderson, E.D. 1987. “R and D project selection and evaluation: A microcomputer based approach.” R and D Management. 17 Iss:4:277–288.Google Scholar
  79. Keefer, D. 1978. “Allocation planning for R and D with uncertainty and multiple objectives.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 25, pp. l.Google Scholar
  80. Keown, A.J., B.W. Taylor, and C.P. Duncan, “Allocation of Research and Development Funds: A Zero-one Goal Programming Approach,” Omega, Vol. 7, 1979, 345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kepler, C., and Blackman, A. 1973. “The use of dynamic programming techniques for determining resource allocations among R and D projects: An example.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 20, pp. l.Google Scholar
  82. Khorramshahgol, R., Azani, H., and Gousty, Y. 1988. “An Integrated approach to project evaluation and selection.” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management. 35, pp. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Krawiec, F. 1984. “ Evaluating and selecting research projects by scoring.” Research Management.Google Scholar
  84. Krogh. L, Prager,J., Sornsen, D., and Tomlinson, J. 1988. “How 3m evaluates its R and D programs.” Research and Technology Management. 31, pp. 6.Google Scholar
  85. Kuwahara, Y., and Yasutsugu, T. 1988. “an empirical view of a managerial evaluation of overall R and D cost effectiveness.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.Google Scholar
  86. Kuwahara, Y., and Takeda, Y. “A contribution to the managerial view on R and D cost-effectiveness evaluation at a large industrial organization.” Presented at: 1988 International conference on strategic R and D Management. Sunshine City Prince Hotel, Ikebukuro, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  87. Lambert, L. 1985. “Project management evaluation techniques for research and development: a high-tech version of the old shell game.” Project Management Journal. 16 Iss:3:47–51.Google Scholar
  88. Lee, S.M., 1971. “Decision Analysis through Goal Programming, Decision Sciences, pp. 2,: 172–180.Google Scholar
  89. Lee, T. 1982. “On the Reswitching property of R and D.” Management Science. 28, pp. 8.Google Scholar
  90. Lee, T. 1985. “On the joint decisions of R and D and Technology adoption.” Management Science. 31, pp. 8.Google Scholar
  91. Liberatore, M., and Titus, G. 1983. “The practice of management science in R and D project management.” Management Science. 29, pp. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Liberatore, M. 1988. “A decision support system linking research and development project selection with business strategy.” Project management Journal. 19 Iss:5:14–21.Google Scholar
  93. Liberatore, M. 1987. “ An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R and D project selection and resource allocation.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 34, pp. 1.Google Scholar
  94. Lockett, A., and Gear, A. 1972. “Program selection in research and development.” Management Science. 18, pp. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lockett, G., and Stratford, M. 1987. “Ranking of research projects: experiments with two methods.” OMEGA International Journal of Management Science. 15, pp. 5:395–400.Google Scholar
  96. Lockett, A., and Gear, A.E. 1973. “Representation and analysis of multi-stage problems in R and D.” Management Science. 16, pp. 8.Google Scholar
  97. Mansfield, E. 1982. “How economists see R and D.” Research Management.Google Scholar
  98. Madey, G., and Dean, B. 1985. “Strategic planning for investment in R and D using decision analysis and mathematical Programming.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 32, pp. 2.Google Scholar
  99. Mandakovic, T., and Souder, W. 1985. “An interactive decomposable heuristic for project selection.” Management Science. 31 Iss:10:1257–1271.Google Scholar
  100. Mansfield, E., 1980. “Basic Research and Productivity Increases in Management,” American Economic Review.Google Scholar
  101. Mansfield, E. and Rapoport, J. S. “The Cost of Industrial Product Innovation, Management Science. Vol. 21, pp. 12.Google Scholar
  102. McGuire, P.E., Evaluating New Product Proposals, New York Conference Board, 1973.Google Scholar
  103. Mehrez, A. 1988. “Selecting R and D projects: A case study of the expected utility approach.” Technovation. 8 Iss:4:299–310.Google Scholar
  104. Minkes, A.C. and Samuels, J.M. 1966. “Allocation of resource and development expenditures in the firm.” Journal of Management Atud. 3: 62–72.Google Scholar
  105. Moore, R. L. 1974. “Methods of determining priorities in a programme of research.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 21, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  106. Moore, J.R. and N.R. Baker, 1967. “An analytical approach to scoring model design - Application to research and development project selection.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. EM-14.Google Scholar
  107. Moore, J, and Baker, N. 1969. “Computational analysis of scoring models for R and D project selection.” Management Science. 16, pp. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Moore, L., and Taylor, B. 1977. “Multiteam, multiproject research and development planning with gert.” Management Science. 24, pp. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Naslund, B. and Sellstedt B., 1974. “An evaluation of some models for determining the R and D budget.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol EM-21, pp. 1., pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
  110. Naslund, B. and Sellstedt B., 1974. “Budgets for R and D: An empirical study of 69 Swedish firms.” R and D Management. Vol. 4, pp. 2, pp. 67–73.Google Scholar
  111. North, D., and Stengel, D. 1982. “Decision analysis of program choices in magnetic fusion energy development.” Management Science. 28, pp. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Nutt, A. 1969. “Testing TORQUR: A quantitive R and D Resource Allocation system.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 16, pp. 4:243–248.Google Scholar
  113. Paolini, A., and Glaser, M. 1977. “Project selection methods that pick winners.” Research Management.Google Scholar
  114. Oral, M., Malouin, J., and Rahn, J. 1981. “Formulating technology policy and planning industrial R and D activities.” Management Science. 27, pp. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Pearson, A.W. 1974. “Project selection in an organizational context.” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management. Vol 21, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  116. Pessemier, E.A., and N.R. Baker, 1971. “Project and program decisions in research and development.” RandD Management. Vol. 2, pp. 1.Google Scholar
  117. Pham, T.G. 1985. “The elusive budgeted cost of work performed for research and development projects.” Project Management Journal. 16 Iss:1:76–79.Google Scholar
  118. Plebani, A. Jr. and Jain, H. 1981. Evaluating research proposals with group techniques,“ Research Management, Vol. 24, 34–38.Google Scholar
  119. Ramsey, J.E., Research and Development: Project Selection Criteria, UMI Research Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  120. Richardson, P., Taylor, A.J., and Gordon, J. 1985. “a strategic approach to evaluating manufacturing performance.” Interfaces. 15 Iss:6:15–27.Google Scholar
  121. Ringuest, J.L. and S.B. Graves, 1989. “A Linear Multi-Objective RandD Project Selection Problem, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 36, pp. 1.Google Scholar
  122. Rosen, E.M., and Souder, W. 1965. “A Method of Allocating RandD Expenditures,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. EM-12, 8793.Google Scholar
  123. Rubenstein, A., and Schroder, H. 1977. “Managerial differences in assessing probabilities of technical success for R and D projects.” Management Science. 24, pp. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Rubenstein, A.H., 1957. “Setting criteria for R and D.” Harvard Business Review. pp. 95–104.Google Scholar
  125. Saaty, Thomas, 1986. “Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process,” Management Science, 32, pp. 7: 841–855.Google Scholar
  126. Sahal, D. 1984. “The innovation dynamics and technology cycles in the computer industry.” OMEGA International Journal of Management Science. 12, pp. 2:153–163.Google Scholar
  127. Souder, W. 1975. “Achieving organizational consensus with respect to R and D project selection criteria.” Management Science. 21, pp. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Schmidt, W., and Freland, J. 1992. “Recent Progress in Modeling RandD Project Selection Process,” IEEE Transactions onEngineering Management, Vol. 39, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Schwartz, S.L., and Vertinsky, I. 1977. “Multiattribute investment decision: A study of R and D project selection,” Management Science. Vol. 24, pp. 3, 285–301.Google Scholar
  130. Sherlekar, B., and Dean, D. 1980. “ An evaluation of the initial year of zero-base budgeting in the federal government.” Management Science. 26, pp. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Silverman, B. 1981. “Project appraisal methodology: a multidimensional R and D benefit/cost assessment tool.” Management Science. 27, pp. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Silverman, B. 1983. “ Project appraisal methodology: Market penetration elements.” Management Science. 29, pp. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Simon, Herbert, 1969. Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  134. Singhal, J., Singhal, K., and Weeks, J. 1988. “Long range process design and compatibility among operations.” Management Science. 34 Iss:5:619–632.Google Scholar
  135. Sunder, W.E. 1969. “The validity of subjective probability of success forecast by R and D project manager.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 16: 35–49.Google Scholar
  136. Souder, W.E., 1972. “Comparative analysis of R and D investment models.” AIIE Transactions. Vol. 4, pp. 1, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  137. Souder, W.E., 1972. “A scoring methodology for assessing the suitability of management science models.” Management Science. Vol. 18, pp. 10, pp. B526–B453.Google Scholar
  138. Souder, W.E., 1973. “Utility and perceived acceptability of R and D project selection models.” Management Science. Vol. 19, pp. 1, pp. 1384–1394.Google Scholar
  139. Souder, W. 1973. “Analytical effectiveness of mathematical models for R and D project selection.” Management Science. 19, pp. 8.Google Scholar
  140. Souder, W., Mandakovic, T. 1986. “R and D Project selection models.” Research Management. 29 Iss:4:36–42.Google Scholar
  141. Stahl, M.J., and Harrell, A. 1975. “Identifying operative goals by modeling project selection decision in research and development,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. Em-30, pp. 4, February, 1975.Google Scholar
  142. Steele, L. 1988. “ What we’ve learned selecting R and D programs and objectives, Research and Technology Management. 31, pp. 2.Google Scholar
  143. Stumpe, W.R., 197g. “What the research manager should know about new product psychology,” Research Management.Google Scholar
  144. Swoveland, C., and Cawdery, J. 1989. “ Liquefied petroleum gas transport: analyzing R and D options for improved safety.” Interfaces. 19 Iss:2:34–47.Google Scholar
  145. Szakonyi, R. 1988. “Dealing with a nonobvious source of problems related to selecting R and D to meet customers’ future needs: Weaknesses within a marketing organization’s individual operations.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 35, pp. l.Google Scholar
  146. Taylor, B., and Moore, L. 1980. “R and D project planning with q-gert network modeling and simulation.” Management Science. 26, pp. l.Google Scholar
  147. Taylor, B., Moore, L., and Clayton, E. 1982. “R and D project selection and manpower allocation with integer nonlinear goal programming.” Management Science. 28, pp. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Themelis, N.J. 1975. “Evaluation and selection of projects in industrial research.” Journal of Management. January, 1976, 15–20Google Scholar
  149. Van de Ven, A. and Delbecq, A. 1971. “Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision making effectiveness.” Academy of Management Journal. 203–212.Google Scholar
  150. Vepsalainen, A., and Lauro, G. 1988. “Analysis of R and D portfoliostrategies for contract competition.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 35, pp. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Verschuur, J., and Potjer, A. 1974. “Maximization of the economic value of research through quantifying the relations between research and the market.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 21, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  152. Von Neuman, J. and O. Morgenstern, 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  153. Walker, N.K., and Philips, C.P. 1969. “The need for allocating resource to combat effectiveness measurements from initial R and D to obsolescence.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol 16, pp. 4: 173–175.Google Scholar
  154. Watters, L.D., 1967. “Research and development project selection: independence and multi-period probabilistic budget constraints.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
  155. Watts, K.M.,and Higgins, J.C. 1987. “The use of advanced management techniques in R and D.” OMEGA International Journal of Management Science. 15, pp. 1:21–29.Google Scholar
  156. Whaley, W., and Williams,R. 1971. “A profits-oriented approach to project selection.” Research Management.Google Scholar
  157. Williams, D.J., “A Study of a Decision Model for RandD Project Selection,” Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 20, pp. 3, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Winkofsky, E.P., Baker, N.R., and Sweeney, D.J. 1981. “A decision process model of R and D resource allocation in Hierarchical organizations.” Management Science. 27, pp. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Winkofsky, E.P., Mason, R.M. and Souder, W.E., 1980. “RandD budgeting and project selection: A review of practices and models.” Management of Research and Innovation, B. V. Dean and J.L. Godhar (eds.) (Amsterdam: North Holland Press. )Google Scholar
  160. Zaidman, B., Cevidalli, G. 1987. “Project evaluation:Externalities must not be disregarded.” R and D management. 17 Iss:4:269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Bretschneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Technology and Information Policy The Maxwell SchoolSyracuse UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations