Price-Cap Regulation in the Postal Sector

An International Comparison and Assessment
  • David E. Treworgy
  • Thomas M. Sharkey
  • David R. Fronk
  • Michael J. Kehoe
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series book series (TREP, volume 31)

Abstract

Policy makers in the United States currently are grappling with the complex process of considering an improved regulatory framework to govern the national postal operator. The motivations for changing the present system, based on cost recovery, range from long-standing dissatisfaction with the status quo to recent fear that technological developments in communication threaten the core postal business.

Keywords

Mercury Transportation Expense Arena Nism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beesley, M.E., and S.C. Littlechild. 1989. “The Regulation of Natural Monopolies in the United Kingdom.” Rand Journal of Economics 20 (Autumn): 454–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen, Laurits R. 1997. “Statement of Dr. Laurits R. Christensen.” Before the Subcommittee on the Postal Service, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, U.S. House of Representatives, April 8.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Robert H., Edward H. Chu, William W. Ferguson, and Spyros S. Xenakis. 1996. “A Cross Sectional Comparison and Analysis of Productivity for 21 National Postal Administrations.” In Managing Change in the Postal and Delivery Industries, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1997. “The Postal Service in Transition: H.R. 22—The Postal Reform Act of 1997. ” Testimony before the Subcommittee on the Postal Service, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, U.S. House of Representatives, April 16.Google Scholar
  5. Knauth, Peter, and Friedhelm Dommermuth. 1996. “Reorganization of the Postal Sector in Germany.” In Diffusion of New Regulatory Approaches in the Postal Sector: Papers presented at the 4th Königswinter Seminar, edited by Ulrich Stumpf and Monika Plum. Wissenschaftliches Institut für Kommunikationsdienste.Google Scholar
  6. Overdijk, Paul. 1996. “Postal Services: Competition in the Netherlands—Current Situation.” In Managing Change in the Postal and Delivery Industries, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Sharkey, Thomas M. 1996. Comments on “Legislative Proposals to Reform the Postal Law in the United States,” by James I. Campbell. In Diffusion of New Regulatory Approaches in the Postal Sector: Papers presented at the 4th Königswinter Seminar, edited by Ulrich Stumpf and Monika Plum. Wissenschaftliches Institut für Kommunikationsdienste.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Treworgy
  • Thomas M. Sharkey
  • David R. Fronk
  • Michael J. Kehoe

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations