Advertisement

Case Study 2

Choosing the Best Waste Incineration Strategy for the Eastern Switzerland Region
  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre
Chapter

Abstract

Switzerland is a confederation of 23 states, called cantons, three of which are subdivided into half-cantons for administrative purposes. The powers of decision making are usually organised from the bottom upwards. In accordance with the ‘subsidiarity principle’, the Confederation only assumes responsibility for duties which the cantons are unable to carry out themselves. Thus the 26 cantons which make up the Federal State have a certain degree of sovereignty, and possess their own political institutions. Collegial government and therefore compromise are crucial factors in the political culture of the country. A number of years ago, cantons began, in co-operation with localities in other countries, to form regions which are primarity concerned with economic and infrastructural issues such as the siting of waste management plants. These regions as yet possess no political institutions of their own. One such region, Eastern Switzerland, comprising Schaffhausen, Uri, Zug, Zurich, Appenzell (divided in two), St Gallen, Thurgau, Glarus, Schwylz, Graubunden and Ticino, plus the Principality of Liechenstein, is the location for the case study outlined below.

Keywords

Decision Support Waste Incineration Discrimination Threshold Incineration Plant Multicriteria Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banville, C., Landry, M.,Martel, J.M., Boulaire, C. (1993) `A Stakeholder’s Approach to MCDA’, University Laval, CRAEDO, Working paper 93–77.Google Scholar
  2. Guigou, J.L. (1971) `On French Location Models for Production Units’. Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1, No. 2, pp 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Maystre, L., Pictet, J., and Simos, J. (1994) Methodes Multicriteres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  4. Nijkamp, P. (1975) `A Multicriteria Analysis for project Evaluation: Economic–Ecological Evaluation of a Land Reclamation Project’. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Volume 35, pp 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rogers, M.G., Bruen, M.P. (1996) `Using ELECTRE to Rank Options within an Environmental Appraisal–Two Case Studies’. Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 13, pp 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rogers and Bruen, (1997) `Threshold values for noise air and water impact criteria within the ELECTRE model’. Proceedings of the 46th Meeting of the European Working Group on Mullticriteria Aid forDecisions, Bastia, Corsica, 23rd to 24th October, 1997, Session 6.Google Scholar
  7. Rogers and Bruen, (1998) `Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE’. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 107, pp 542–551.Google Scholar
  8. Roy, B. (1968) `Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE)’. Revue Francaise d ‘Automatique Information et Recherche Operationelle (RIRO). Volume 8, pp57–75.Google Scholar
  9. Roy, B., Hugonnard, B. (1982) `Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multicriteria Method’ Transportation Research Record, Volume 16A, No. 4, pp 301–312.Google Scholar
  10. Siskos, J., Hubert, P. (1988) `Multicriteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Approach’. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 13, pp 278–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Delft, A., Nijkamp, P. (1977) Multicriteria Analysis and Regional Decision Making. Martinus Nijhoff Social Services Division, Leiden.Google Scholar
  12. Vincke, P. (1992)MulticriteriaDecision Aid. John Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations