Skip to main content

Cooperative rent-seeking

  • Chapter
Efficient Rent-Seeking
  • 782 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of cooperation in the context of a repeated rent-seeking game which can be thought of as modeling bilateral situations such as military/political conflict, labor/business lobbying, gang/illegal activities, or criminal/civil law suits. The potential for mutually advantageous agreements is explored using the repeated nature of the game as the mechanism which sustains the cooperation. The Nash bargaining solution is applied to symmetric as well as asymmetric rent-seeking situations. The asymmetries can derive from the players valuing the rent differently or choosing sequentially.

The author gratefully acknowledges helpful comments by Bill Beck, Tom Homewood, and an anonymous referee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Buchanan (1980) for an excellent introduction to this problem.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann (1981) provides an excellent discussion of equilibria in repeated games.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Although the word “collusive” could easily be used here, these agreements will be called “cooperative” to avoid any negative connotations.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For more details and an excellent discussion of this, see Binmore (1992: 180–191).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A more detailed explanation of these bargaining solutions can be found in Shubik (1982: 194–200).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Linster (19936) shows how to find the Nash equilibrium in this game.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a detailed description of how these curves are derived for both the Stackelberg and simultaneous-move games, see Linster (1993b).

    Google Scholar 

  8. To see this, notice U1 + U2 = (x1+x2)/(x1+x2) - (x1+x2) = 1 - (x1+x2) 333 1 as long as x1 + x2 111 0, and U1 + U2 = 1 if x1 + x2 = 0.

    Google Scholar 

  9. To see that this is true, let one of the players cheat by making a contribution of y 111 0 which is arbitrarily close to zero. Then he will have a payoff of 1— y, which is arbitrarily close to one.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For an excellent discussion of bargaining and the Nash Bargaining solution, see Binmore (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Linster, B.G. (2001). Cooperative rent-seeking. In: Lockard, A.A., Tullock, G. (eds) Efficient Rent-Seeking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5055-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5055-3_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5055-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics