Advertisement

International Tax Competition: A New Framework for Analysis

  • Peter Birch Sørensen
Chapter

Abstract

Spurred by the liberalisation of capital flows and the launching of the EU single market and monetary union, the last two decades have witnessed an intense European and international debate on the need for supranational tax co-ordination. In recent years there has been a clear shift in the dominant opinion in this long-standing debate. Only a few years ago the European Commission expressed concern that international tax competition seems to shift the tax burden from mobile capital onto unemploymentridden labour. The Commission therefore argued for improved co-ordination of capital taxation within the EU to prevent further shifts in the tax burden to the disadvantage of labour. However, more recently the Commission has expressed the view that “... a reasonable degree of tax competition within the EU is healthy and should be allowed to operate. Tax competition may strengthen fiscal discipline to the extent that it encourages member states to streamline their public expenditure, thus allowing a reduction in the overall tax burden.” (European Commission, 2001, p. 4).

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Labour Income Labour Supply Elasticity Effective Labour Supply 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, R., Krugman, P., “Agglomeration, Integration and Tax Harmonization”, CEPR Discussion Paper, 2000, (2630).Google Scholar
  2. Daveri, F., Tabellini, G., “Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in Industrial Countries”, Economic Policy, 2000, pp. 49–104.Google Scholar
  3. Devereux, M., Griffith, R., “Have Taxes on Mobile Capital Declined?” Paper presented at the conference on World Tax Competition, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, May 2001.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission, Future Priorities for EU Tax Policy, Working document prepared for the fourteenth meeting of the Taxation Policy Group, 16 March 2001, Doc. TPG\010316.Google Scholar
  5. Hammer, R.M., Owens, J., Promoting Tax Competition, OECD Secretariat, Paris, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Keen, M., “Preferential Tax Regimes can make Tax Competition less Harmful”, National Tax Journal, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. Martinez-Mongay, C., “ECFIN’s Effective Tax Rates — Properties and Comparisons with other Tax Indicators.” European Commission, Economic Papers, 2000, (146).Google Scholar
  8. Martinez-Mongay, C., Huizinga, H., “Labor Taxation in the European Union.” Paper presented at the conference on ‘Tax Policy in the European Union’ organised by OCFEB of Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Hague, October 17–19, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Mendoza, E., Razin, A, Tesar, L., “Effective Tax Rates in Macroeconomics: Cross-Country Estimates of Tax Rates on Factor Incomes and Consumption”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 1994, (34), pp. 297–323.Google Scholar
  10. Sorensen, P.B., “The Case for International Tax Coordination Reconsidered”, Economic Policy, 2000, (31), pp. 429–472.Google Scholar
  11. Sorensen, P.B. (2001A), OECDTAX — A model of tax policy in the OECD economy. Economic Policy Research Unit, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen, November 2001, Technical Working Paper (http://www.econ.ku.dk/pbs/default.htm). Google Scholar
  12. Sorensen, P.B. (2001B), The German Tax Reform of 2000: Domestic Effects and International Repercussions. Invited lecture presented at the Annual Congress 2001 of the Verein für Sozialpolitik, Universität Magdeburg, September 25 to 28, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. Sorensen, P.B. (2002), “Tax Coordination in the European Union: What are the Issues?” Forthcoming in Swedish Economic Policy Review.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Birch Sørensen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations