Advertisement

Tracking Business Rules from Their Source to Their Implementation to Support is Maintenance

  • Marko Bajec
  • Damjan Vavpotič
  • Marjan Krisper
Conference paper

Abstract

Business rules describe how organisations are doing business. Their value has also been recognised within the information system (IS) domain, mostly because of their ability to make applications flexible and amenable to change. In this paper we argue that business rules can be used as a link between organisations and their ISs. We show that business rules originate in organisations and that many business rules are explicitly or implicitly captured in enterprise models. We advocate, based on research work, that if business rules are managed in an appropriate manner they can help keeping IS aligned and consistent with the business environment. In the paper we propose a business rule management scenario for managing business rules from an organisational perspective. The scenario recognises business rule management as an interface between enterprise modelling and IS development and maintenance.

Keywords

Business Process Tacit Knowledge Business Environment Business Process Model Business Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assche Van, F., Layzell P. J. and Anderson M., 1988, RUBRIC — A Rule-Based Approach to Information Systems Requirements, Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Information Technology for Organisational Systems, Athens.Google Scholar
  2. Bajec, M., 2001, Definition of the Conceptual Framework for Business Rule Management in Organisations, PhD Thesis, Laboratory of Information Systems, UL - Faculty of Computer & Information Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  3. Bubenko, J. A., Persson, A. and Stima, J., 2001, D3 Appendix B: EKD User Guide, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  4. Bubenko, J. A. and Wangler, B., 1993, Objectives driven capture of business rules and of information systems requirements, Proceedings of International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Systems Engineering in the Service of Humans, vol.1., 670–677.Google Scholar
  5. Date, C. J., 2000. What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application Development. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Eriksson, H. E. and Penker, M., 2000, Business Modelling with UML, Business Patterns at Work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Fraser, J., ed, 1994, Enterprise State of the Art Survey, Part 5, Technologies Supporting Enterprise Modelling, DTI ISIP Project Number 8032, AIAl, The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  8. Hay, D. and Healy, K. A., 1997, GUIDE Business Rules Project, Final Report — revision 1. 2. GUIDE International Corporation, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Herbst, H., 1996, Business Rules in Systems Analysis: A Meta-Model and Repository System. Information Systems, 21 (2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Layzell, P. J. and Loucopoulos, P., 1988, A Rule-Based Approach to the Construction and Evolution of Business Information Systems, Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 258–264.Google Scholar
  11. McBrien, P. J., Niézette, M., Pantazis, D., Seltveit, A. H., Sundin, U., Theodoulidis, B., Tziallas, G. and Wohed, R., 1991, A Rule Language to Capture and Model Business Policy Specifications, in Proceedings of CAiSE 1991, Spinger-Verlag LNCS 498, 307–318.Google Scholar
  12. Morgenstern, M., 1983, Active Databases as a Paradigm for Enhanced Computing Environments, Proceeding of the 9th International conference on Very Large Databases, Florence, Italy, 34–42.Google Scholar
  13. Persson, A. and Stima, J., 2002. An explorative study into the influence of business goals on the practical use of Enterprise Modelling methods and tools, in: New Perspectives on Information Systems Development: Theory, Methods and Practice, G. Harindranath et al., eds., Kluwer Academic, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Struck, D. L., 1999, Business Rule Continuous Requirements Environment, PhD Thesis, Colorado Technical University, Colorado Springs, Colorado.Google Scholar
  15. Warmer, J. B. and Anneke, G. K., 1999, The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modelling With UML, Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. WMFC. Workflow Management Coalition, Terminology & Glossary, Document Number WFMC-TC-1011, February 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Widom, J. and Ceri, S., 1996, Active Database Systems — Triggers and Rules For Advanced Database Processing, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  18. Youdeowei, A., 1997, The B-Rule Methodology: A Business Rule Approach to Information Systems Development, PhD Thesis, Department of Computation UMIST, Manchester, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marko Bajec
    • 1
  • Damjan Vavpotič
    • 1
  • Marjan Krisper
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations