Domain Model Driven Approach to Change Impact Assessment

  • Darijus Strašunskas
  • Sari Hakkarainen
Conference paper


Information system development is a highly iterative process in which developers seek to capture the needs and desires of all stakeholders. The goal is to transform the requirements into a complete system consisting of both manual and computerized parts. The product of such a development project undergoes changes because of its iterative nature. Extensive attention is given to traceability as a means to relate different different system descriptions and to allow changes in one of the system descriptions — requirements specification, design, code, documentation, or test scenarios — to be predicted and traced to the corresponding fragments of the other descriptions.1 Such correspondence relationships should be maintained throughout the lifetime of a system in order to manage the artifact.


Domain Model Requirement Engineer Domain Concept Bayesian Belief Network Product Fragment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. Greenspan and C. McGowan, Structuring Software Development for Reliability, Microelectronics and Reliability, 17, 75–84 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. C. Z. Gotel, A. C. W. Finkelstein, An Analysis of the Requirements Traceability Problem, in: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Requirements Engineering ( ICRE’94), (IEEE Computer Society Press, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA, April 1994 ), pp. 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Watkins, M. Neal, Why and How of Requirements Tracing, IEEE Software, l 1(4), 104–106 (1994).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Stra§unskas, Traceability in a Collaborative Systems Development from Lifecycle Perspective, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Traceability, co-located with ASE 2002, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, September 2002, 54–60Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Pinheiro and J. Goguen, An Object-Oriented Tool for Tracing Requirements, IEEE Software, 13 (2), 52–64 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Pohl, PRO-ART: Enabling Requirements Pre-Traceability, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICSE ‘86), Colorado, USA, 1996, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Grünbacher, A. Egyed, and N. Medvidovic, Reconciling Software Requirements and Architectures–The CBSP Approach, in: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering ( RE’01) (Springer-Verlag, Toronto, Canada, 2001 ), pp. 202–211.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Pohl, M. Brandenburg, and A. Gülich, Integrating Requirement and Architecture Information: A Scenario and Meta-Model Based Approach, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ’01), Interlaken, Switzerland, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Letelier, A framework for Requirements Traceability in UML based projects, in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Traceability, co-located with ASE 2002, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, September 2002, 32–41.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. T. Frezza, S. P. Levitan, P. K. Chrysanthis, Linking requirements and design data for automated functional evaluation, Computers in Industry, Volume 30, Issue 1, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1325 (1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Egyed, Reasonings about Trace dependencies in a Multi-Dimensional Space, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Traceability, co-located with ASE 2002, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, September 2002, 42–45Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. A. Farshchian, A Framework for Supporting Shared Interaction in Distributed Product Development Projects, PhD thesis, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Brasethvik and J. A. Gulla, Natural Language Analysis for Semantic Document Modeling, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Application of Natural Language for Information Systems (NLDB ‘2000) in Versailles, France, June 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro, Modern Information Retrieval. (Addison-Wesley, 1999 ).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Selvberg and T. Brasethvik, The Referent Model Language, Technical Report, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Matulevidius, MEIS requirements specification,• Technical report, NTNU, Trondheim, NTNU, June 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F.V. Jensen, An Introduction to Bayesian Networks, ( UCL Press, London, 1996 ).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, (Morgan Kaufmann. 1988 ).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Microsoft Bayesian Network Editor and Tool Kit; Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darijus Strašunskas
  • Sari Hakkarainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer and Information ScienceNorwegian Univ. of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations