Advertisement

A Quality Model for the Evaluation of Software Requirements Specifications

  • Jennifer L. Gasston
Conference paper

Abstract

A number of models for software product quality have been defined in the literature. Hierarchical models (for example McCall et al., 1977; Boehm et al., 1978) Quantitative models (for example Gilb, 1985, 1987) and Product/process-based models (for example Kitchenham, 1987). However, criticisms have been aimed at the product quality models in terms of the difficulties involved in their practical application.

Keywords

Quality Attribute Software Quality Requirement Engineer Software Requirement Software Requirement Specification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basili, V. R. and Musa, J. D., 1991, The future engineering of software: A management perspective, Computer, September 1991, 90–96.Google Scholar
  2. Boehm, B. W., Brown, J. R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., MacLead, G. J. and Menit, M. J., 1978, Characteristics of software quality, Volume 1 of TRW Series of Software Technology North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N., 1988, A Field of Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems, Communications of the ACM, 31 (11), 1268–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dromey, R. G., 2003, Software Quality-Prevention versus Cure?, Softare Quality Journal, 11, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dromey, R. G., 1995, “A Model for Software Product Quality”, IEEE SoftwareEngineering, Vol 21, No 1, 118.Google Scholar
  6. Dromey, R. G., 1996, Cornering the Chimera, 1996, IEEE Software, Vol 13, No. 1, Jan. 1996, 33–43.Google Scholar
  7. Gilb, T., 1985, Tools for design by objectives, in: Software requirements specification and testing, Anderson, T., ed., Blackwell Scientific, UK, pp. 50–63.Google Scholar
  8. Gilb, T., 1987, Principles of Software Engineering Management, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mas. USA.Google Scholar
  9. ISO/IEC TR 15504–5, 1998, Information Technology - Software process assessment - Part 5:An assessmentGoogle Scholar
  10. model and indicator guidance, Technical Report type 2, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  11. ISO/IEC 14598–1–6, 1999, Information technology – Software product evaluation, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  12. ISO/IEC 9126, 1991, Information Technology - Software Product Evaluation - Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  13. Kitchenham, B., 1987, Towards a constructive quality model, Part 1: Software quality modelling, measurement and prediction, Software Engineering Journal, Vol 2, No 4, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitchenham, B. and Pfleeger, S. L., 1996, Software Quality: The Elusive Target, IEEE Software, January, Vol 13, No 1, 12–21.Google Scholar
  15. Lubas, M., Potts, C. and Richter, C., 1993, A Review of the State of the Practice in Requirement Modelling, IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  16. McCall, J. A., Richards, P. K. and Walters, G. F., 1977, Factors in Software Quality, Vol. 1, 2, 3, AD/A-049014/015/055, National Tech. Information Service, Springfield, VA.Google Scholar
  17. Nuseibeh, B. and Easterbrook, S., 2000, Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap, in: The Future of Software Engineereing 2000, 22 nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Finkelstein, A., ed., ACM, pp. 37–46.Google Scholar
  18. Sommerville, I. and Sawyer, S., 19971, Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide,John Wiley and Sons, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, W.M., Rosenberg, L. H. and Hyatt, L. E., 1996, Automated Quality Analysis of Natural Language Requirements Specifications ARM Tool, in Proceedings of 14th Annual Pacific Conference NW SW QC. October 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Gasston
    • 1
  1. 1.Software Quality Institute, School of Computing and Information TechnologyGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations