Advertisement

Triboelectrochemistry

  • V. Guruswamy
  • J. O’M. Bockris
Part of the Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry book series (AN, volume 4)

Abstract

The effect of changing friction by applying an electrochemical potential is a phenomenon of theoretical interest and practical application. Triboelectrochemistry, the study of friction with applied electrochemical potential, may be used to study contact adsorption on solid electrodes. Until now, techniques for studying the double-layer structure and contact adsorption on solid electrodes have been less precise than the electrocapillary techniques for mercury.

Keywords

Electrochemical Potential Solid Electrode Rehbinder Effect Electrocapillary Curve Nonpolarizable Electrode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. H. Buckley, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 4224 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. I. Bakradze and M. K. Ivanov, Soobschch. Akad. Nauk Gruz. S.S.R. Saknah 76 (3), 673 (1974).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Edison, Teleg. J. 5, 189 (1877); Teleg. J. 7, 332 (1879); C. R. Acad. Sci. 87, 270 (1879); Nature (London) 19, 471 (1879).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. R. Koch, Weidemann’s Ann. 7, 92 (1879).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. K. Waitz, Weidemann’s Ann. 7, 92 (1879).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Krouchkoll, C. R. Acad. Sci. 95, 177 (1882); Ann. Chim. Phys. 17, 182 (1889).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. E. D. Clark, Trans. Faraday Soc. 42, 449 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rehbinder and Wenstrom, Acta Physochim. 19, 36 (1944).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rehbinder and Wenstrom, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 68, 329 (1949).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. O’M. Bockris and S. D. Argade, J. Chem. Phys. 50 (4), 1623 (1968).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. E. Movsesov and V. D. Evdokimov, Fiz-Khim. Mekh. Mater. (FKMMAJ) 9 (6), 103 (1973).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. P. Bowden and L. Young, Research 3, 235 (1950).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. O’M. Bockris and R. Parry-Jones, Nature 171, (May 23, 1953 ).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. N. Staicopolus, J. Electrochem. Soc. Electrochem. Sci. Tech. 108 (9), 903 (1975).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. O’M. Bockris and S. D. Argade, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 1622 (1969).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. O’M. Bockris and R. K. Sen, Surf. Sci. 30, 237 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu M. Korobov, V. A. Kuznetsov, Yu G. Kotlov, G. A. Preis, and A. A. Moiseenko, Probl. Treniya Eznashivaniya (PTIAQT) 8, 61 (1975).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. N. Uchuvatkin and M. M. Khrushicov, in “ Nauka” Moscow Conference Proceedings (1973), p. 35.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. E. Dubois, P. C. Lacaze, R. Courtel, C. C. Herrmann, and D. Mougis, J. Electrochem. Soc. Electrochem. Sci. Tech. 11, 1458 (1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. S. Bagotski, Yu B. Vassiliev, and I. I. Pyshnograeva, Electrochim. Acta 16, 2141 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Guruswamy
    • 1
  • J. O’M. Bockris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations