Methodological Concerns when Designing Trials for the Efficacy of Acupuncture for the Treatment of Pain

  • P. J. White
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 546)


It has taken some considerable time for acupuncture to gain any form of respectability within western medicine. Indeed there is still some resistance from many quarters where acupuncture is still viewed with a large dose of scepticism. Not least is the problem that many of the concepts inherent within traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) do not translate well into western scientific thinking 1. It seems churlish however to discount this modality because of an inability to either grasp its basic tenets or due to perhaps an inadequacy of western science to adequately measure the forces that TCM maintains exists. It must be remembered that TCM has evolved within a framework of pure observation of cause and effect and has anecdotally been shown to be effective over millennia. Adherents may maintain that the inability to provide ‘proof’ does not diminish its usefulness as an effective treatment. It is perhaps this very attitude, which relies on anecdotal evidence rather than scientific evidence, which has alienated many in the western medical profession2. The idea that acupuncture is simply ‘mumbo jumbo’ is however gradually subsiding within the west. This is occurring in the wake of ongoing scientific investigation and credible hypotheses as to its mechanism as well as the emergence of guidelines designed to assist with the design and reporting of trials, both in general and specifically for acupuncture3–5.


Traditional Chinese Medicine Placebo Effect Placebo Control Complementary Medicine Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Salzberg C, Miller A, Johnson LK. Acupuncture: history, clinical uses, and proposed physiology. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 1995; 6:905–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lynn J. Using complementary therapies: acupuncture. Professional Nurse 1996; 11:722–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    White A, Filshie J, Cummings M. Clinical trials of acupuncture: consensus recommendations for optimal treatment, sham controls and blinding. Complement Ther.Med 2001; 9:237–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moher D, Schulz K, Altman G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomised trials. The Lancet 2001; 357:1191–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacPherson H, White A, Cummings M, Jobst K, Rose K, Niemtzow R. Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: The STRICTA recommendations. Acupuncture in Medicine 2002; 20:22–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barnes J, Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Ernst E. Articles on complementary medicine in the mainstream medical literature: an investigation of MEDLINE, 1966 through 1996. Arch Intern.Med 1999; 159:1721–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Araujo M. Does the Choice of Placebo Determine the Results of Clinical Studies on Acupuncture. Research in Complementary Medicine 1998; 5:8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newham DJ. Methodological perspectives. Disabil. Rehabil 1999; 21:134–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kiene H. A Critique of the Double-Blind Clinical Trial-Part 1. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 1996; 2:74–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaus W, Hogel J. Studies on the efficacy of unconventional therapies. Problems and designs. Arzneimittel Forschung/Drug Research 1995; 45:88–92.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Margolin A, Avants SK, Kleber HD. Investigating alternative medicine therapies in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1998; 280:1626–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel MS. Problems in the evaluation of alternative medicine. Soc.Sci.Med. 1987; 25:669–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White, P. A study for the efficacy of a western acupuncture protocol for the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain. 2002. University of Southampton. Ref Type: Thesis/Dissertation.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewith GT. Can we assess the effects of acupuncture? [editorial]. BrMed.J.Clin.Res.Ed 1984; 288:1475–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harden RN. The pitfalls of clinical acupuncture research: can east satisfy west? Arthritis Care and Research 1994; 7:115–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zaslawski C, Rogers C, Garvey M, Ryan D, Yang CX, Zhang SP. Strategies to maintain the credibility of sham acupuncture used as a control treatment in clinical trials [see comments]. J.Altern.Complement Med. 1997; 3:257–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ernst E, White AR. A review of problems in clinical acupuncture research. Am.J.Chin Med. 1997; 25:3–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Godfrey C, Morgan P. A controlled trial of the theory of acupuncture in musculoskeletal pain. J. Rheumatology 1978; 5:121–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Le Bars D, Villanueva L, Willer J, Bouhassira D. Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls (DNIC) in Animals and Man. Acupuncture in Medicine 1991; 9:47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewith GT, Machin D. On the evaluation of the clinical effects of acupuncture. Pain 1983; 16:111–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ernst E. Is acupuncture effective for pain control? [letter]. J.Pain Symptom.Manage. 1994; 9:72–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewith G, Vincent C. Evaluation of the Clinical Effects of Acupuncture. A problem Reassessed and a Framework for Future Research. Pain Forum 1995; 4:29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Birch S. Issues to consider in determining an adequate treatment in a clinical trial of acupuncture. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 1997; 5:8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Birch S. Testing the clinical specificity of needle sites in controlled clinical trials of acupuncture. Proceedings of the second annual meeting, society for acupuncture research 1995; 274–94.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hopwood V, Lovesey M, Mokone S. Acupuncture and Related Techniques in Physical Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    White AR, Ernst E. A trial method for assessing the adequacy of acupuncture treatments. Altern.Ther.Health Med. 1998; 4:66–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ezzo J, Berman BM, Hadhazy V, Jadad A, Lao L, Singh BB. Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review. Pain 2000; 86:217–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pomeranz B. Bruce Pomeranz, PHD. Acupuncture and the raison d’etre for alternative medicine [interview by Bonnie Horrigan]. Altern.Ther.Health Med. 1996; 2:85–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomas M. Acupuncture studies on pain. Acupuncture in Medicine 1997; 15:23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hammerschlag R. Methodological and ethical issues in clinical trials of acupuncture. J.Altern. Complement Med. 1998; 4:159–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sherman K, Cherkin D, Hogeboom C. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic low-back pain by traditional Chinese medical acupuncturists. J.Altern. Complement Med. 2001; 7:641–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hammerschlag R, Morris MM. Clinical trials comparing acupuncture with biomedical standard care: a criteria-based evaluation of research design and reporting [corrected] [published erratum appears in COMPLEMENTARY THER MED 1997 Dec; 5(4): 253]. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 1997; 5:133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D. Empirical Evidence of Bias. JAMA 1995; 273:408–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peck C, Coleman G. Implications of Placebo Theory for Clinical Research and Practice in Pain Management. Theoretical Medicine 1991; 12:247–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mackay M. Acupuncture and placebos [letter]. N.Z.Med.J. 1985; 98:606–7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Walach H, Maidhof C. Is the Placebo Effect Dependent on Time? A Meta-Analysis. In Kirsch D, ed. How Expectancies Shape Experience, pp. 321–32. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaptchuk TJ, Goldman P, Stone D, Stason W. Do medical devices have enhanced placebo effects? J.Clin.Epidemiol. 2000; 53:786–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    de la Tone CS. The choice of control groups in invasive clinical trials such as acupuncture. Frontier Perspectives 1993; 3:33–7.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Engelbart JH, Kloppenburg GV. The treatment of pain by acupuncture. The riddle of acupuncture and the place of the acupuncturist in the pain-team. Acta Anaesthesiol.Belg. 1981; 32:33–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stux G, Pomeranz B. Basics of acupuncture. Springer Verlag New York 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sims J. The mechanism of acupuncture analgesia: a review. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 1997; 5:102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vincent C, Lewith G. Beijing to Belgrade-Making Sense of Acupuncture Research. APS Journal 1994; 3:89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vincent C, Lewith G. Placebo controls for acupuncture studies. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1995; 88:199–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    White AR, Eddleston C, Hardie R, Resch KL, Ernst E. A pilot study of acupuncture for tension headache, using a novel placebo. Acupuncture in Medicine 1996; 14:11–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Streitberger K, Kleinhenz J. Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research. Lancet 1998; 352:364–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaptchuk TJ. Placebo needle for acupuncture [letter]. Lancet 1998; 352:992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Petrie J, Hazleman B. Credibility of placebo transcutaneous nerve stimulation and acupuncture. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 1985; 3:151–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wood R, Lewith G. The Credibility of Placebo Controls in Acupuncture Studies. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 1998; 6:79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Richardson PH, Vincent CA. Acupuncture for the treatment of pain: a review of evaluative research. Pain 1986; 24:15–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Borkovec T, Nau S. Credibility of Analogue Therapy Rationales. J. Behav Therand Exp.Psychiat 1972; 3:257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vincent C. Credibility Assessment in Trials of Acupuncture. Comp.Med.Res. 1990; 4:8–11.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Downs S, Black N. The feasability of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non randomised studies of health care interventions. J. Epidemiol.Community Health 1998; 52:377–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. White

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations