Is Postal Service a Natural Monopoly?
The title of this paper raises what is perhaps the most pressing empirical question facing policy makers interested in postal reform. For if postal service is a technological natural monopoly, competition should be introduced into the system with extreme caution, if at all. Unfortunately, I have nothing to contribute to the empirical debate. Indeed, I shall argue that it is unlikely that the question will ever be satisfactorily resolved by econometric research. Nevertheless, I am convinced that postal service is a natural monopoly. Yet that “fact” in no way exempts the industry from competitive reform. This apparent paradox is resolved by appealing to the network structure of postal service and to carefully drawn analogies to recent United States experience in telecommunications, another network industry.
KeywordsTransportation Posit Agglomeration Sorting Defend
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bailey,E. E. 1981. “Contestability and the Design of Regulatory and Antitrust Policy,” American Economic Review, (May): 178–183.Google Scholar
- Bailey, E. E., and W. J. Baumol. 1984. “Deregulation and the Theory of Contestable Markets,” Yale Journal of Regulation: 111–137.Google Scholar
- Baumol, W.J. 1977. “On the Proper Cost Tests for Natural Monopoly,”American Economic Review (December): 809–822.Google Scholar
- Baumol, W.J., E. E. Bailey, and R. D. Willig. 1977. ‘Weak Invisible Hand Theorems on the Sustainability of Prices in a Multiproduct Monopoly,“ American Economic Review (June): 350–365.Google Scholar
- Baumol, W.J., J. C. Panzar, and R. D. Willig. 1982. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.Google Scholar
- Crew, M.A., and P. R. Kleindorfer. 1991. “Rowland Hill’s Contribution as an Economist”. (In this volume).Google Scholar
- Faulhaber, G.R. 1975. “Cross-Subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprise,” American Economic Review (December) 966–977.Google Scholar
- Fuss, M.A. 1983. “A Survey of Recent Results in the Analysis of Production Conditions in Telecommunications.” In Economic Analysis of Telecommunications: Theory and Applications, edited by L. Courville, A. de Fontenay and R. Dobell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Kahn, A.E. 1971. The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions, Volume 2. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Owen, B.M., and R. D. Willig. 1983. “Economics and Postal Pricing.” In The Future of the Postal Service, edited by Joel Fleishmanin. Aspen: Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
- Panzar, J.C. 1989. “Theoretical Determinants of Firm and Industry Structure.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- Panzar, J.C., and R. D. Willig. 1977a “Free Entry and the Sustainability of Natural Monopoly.” Bell Journal of Economics (Spring): 1–22.Google Scholar
- Panzar, J.C., and R. D. Willig. 1977b. “Economies of Scale in Multi-Output Production.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (August): pp. 481–494.Google Scholar
- Sorkin, A.L. 1980. The Economics of the Postal System. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
- Spady, R.S. 1985 “Using Indexed Quadratic Cost Functions to Model Network Technologies.” In Analytical Studies in Transport Economics, edited by A. F. Daughety. Cambridge, UK: University Press. U.S. Postal Service. 1985. Annual Report of the Postmaster General.Google Scholar
- Albon, R. 1987. Privatize the Post. London: Center for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
- Estrin, S., and D. De Meza. 1990. “The Postal Monopoly: A Case Study.” Economic Review (January): 2–7.Google Scholar
- Hay, D.A., and D.J. Morris. 1979. Industrial Economics: Theory and Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pryke, R. 1981. The Nationalized Industries. Oxford: Mart in Robertson.Google Scholar