It has been more than a decade since the beginning of efforts to renew calculus teaching in this country. Those efforts, successful beyond the wildest dreams of their initiators, have reached a plateau. The reaction has been at times intemperate and at times thoughtful, and has led to serious efforts to reinvigorate the traditional curriculum (see How to Teach Mathematics 1 and its appendixes).
KeywordsConceptual Understanding Extended Problem Traditional Curriculum Exam Question Solve Word Problem
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.S. G. Krantz, How to Teach Mathematics, 2nd ed. ( American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1999 ).Google Scholar
- 2.R. G. Douglas (ed.), Toward a Lean and Lively Calculus, MAA Notes #6 (Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1986 ).Google Scholar
- 3.L. A. Steen (ed.), Calculus for a New Century: A Pump, not a Filter, MAA Notes #8 ( Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1988 ).Google Scholar
- 4.W. G. McCallum, “Will This Be on the Exam?” In Ref. 1.Google Scholar
- 5.Third International Mathematics and Science Study, http://nced.ed.gov/TIMSS.Google Scholar
- 6.P. Renz, “Style Versus Content: Forces Shaping the Evolution of Textbooks,” pp. 85–102 in Ref. 2.Google Scholar
- 7.W. G. McCallum, “Rigor in the Undergraduate Calculus Curriculum,” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 38 (9) (1991): 1131–1132.Google Scholar
- 8.D. Smith and L. Moore, Calculus: Modeling and Application ( Heath, Boston, 1996 ).Google Scholar
- 9.J. Uhl, W. Davis, and H. Porta, Calculus & Mathematica: ( Addison—Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994 ).Google Scholar
- 10.H. Bass, “Mathematicians as Educators,” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 44 (1) (1997): 18–21.Google Scholar