Skip to main content

Selecting a Discount Rate or MARR

  • Chapter
Building Economics: Theory and Practice

Abstract

The discount rate, or MARR,1 imposes a condition of minimum profitability which a project or project increment must meet to qualify for acceptance. Because it affects whether a project will be accepted or rejected and how much will be spent on it, the value of the discount rate is a key ingredient in an economic evaluation. If it is set too high, some projects which are economic will be rejected; if too low, some projects which are uneconomic will be accepted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. 1966. Discounting and public investment criteria. Water Resources Research. (Edited by A. V. Kneese and S. C. Smith.) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 1988. Annual Statistical Digest 1987. Washington, DC: Publication Services, Board of Governors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 1988. Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15. Weekly Series for 1988. Washington, DC: Publications Services, Board of Governors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Robert J. and Rudolph R. Yanuck. 1980. Life Cycle Costing: A Practical Guide for Energy Managers. Atlanta, Georgia: The Fairmont Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexel Burnham Lambert. 1988. Decision-makers real yield. Research report prepared by Hoey, Richard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Otto. 1957. Investment criteria for economic development and the theory of intertemporal welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics LXXI(l): 56–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Irving. 1954. The Theory of Interest. New York: Kelly and Millman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C., and J. V. Krutilla. 1975. Resource conservation, environmental preservation, and the rate of discount. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89(3): 358–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C., and F. M. Peterson. 1976. The environment in economics: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 14(1): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Russell J. 1981. Capital Asset Pricing Theories—Evolution and New Frontiers. Monograph No. 12. Charlottesville, Virginia: The Financial Analysts Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J., and D. Shapiro. 1969. The treatment of risk and uncertainty. Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System. Subcommittee on Economy in Government, Joint Economic Committee, 91st Congress, 1st session.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Daniel M. and Stewart C. Myers. 1977. Trends in Corporate Profitability and Capital Costs. WP 937–77. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson, Roger G. and Rex A. Sinquefield. 1976. Stocks, bonds, bills, and inflation: Year-by-year historical returns (1926–74). Journal of Business 49: 11–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. 1936. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. V., and A. C. Fisher. 1975. The Economics of Natural Environments. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, Stephen F. 1973. Interest rates and the inflation premium. Monthly Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. May: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, Stephen A. 1963. The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. LXXVII(1): 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell, Raymond F. 1977. The Rate of Discount for Evaluating Public Projects. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, Rosalie T. 1990 (in press). Life-Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program (Revised). NIST Handbook 135. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, Rosalie T., G. Thomas Sav, Jeanne W. Powell, and E. Thomas. 1982. Economics Evaluation of Solar Energy Systems in Commercial Buildings. NBSIR 82–2540. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, Rosalie T. and Stephen R. Petersen. 1987. Comprehensive Guide to Least-Cost Energy Decisions. SP 709. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, H. M. 1971. On the demise of the social discount rate. Journal of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 704, Section 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 10 Part 436, Section 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Federal Energy Management Improvement Act of 1986 (P.L. 100–615).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Subcommittee on Economy in Government. 1968. Hearings on Economic Analysis of Public Investment Decisions: Interest Rate Policy and Discounting Analysis. 84th Congress, 2nd session.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Energy Security Act of 1980 (P.L. 96–294, 94 STAT 611, Sec. 405).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 1972. Circular A-94 (Revised). Discount rates to be used in evaluating time-distributed costs and benefits. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget, March 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 1986. Circular No. A-104 (Revised). Evaluating leases of capital assets. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget, June 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruegg, R.T., Marshall, H.E. (1990). Selecting a Discount Rate or MARR. In: Building Economics: Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4688-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4688-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4690-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4688-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics