Abstract
This paper has two purposes: the first is to describe the basic physiology of human reproduction, with particular emphasis on intervention in the reproductive process for the purpose of contraception; the second is to present a new barrier method of contraception for females which has been developed by Vorhauer Laboratories, Inc.
During the design and development of this non-implantable, vaginal contraceptive sponge (VCS) device, the bioengineering aspects of human sexual intercourse and the esthetics of this activity were basic considerations. As a background for the rationale involved, the physiology of the human male and female reproductive systems, the response of human anatomy during coitus, and the fundamentals of current contraceptive techniques are reviewed. Details of the development process are given to provide insight into the medical-bioengineering interfaces involved, and the clinical evaluation programs establishing the safety and effectiveness of the VCS are also outlined.
The COLLATEXTM Contraceptive Sponge developed by VLI is a diaphragm like device, molded from a new biomaterial, a hydrophilic polyurethane. The VCS is impregnated with a conventional spermicide, Nonoxynol-9. Because of its compatibility with the vaginal environment, the device is intended for a single 2-day use period, with multiple coital episodes possible during this time. Sexual spontaneity is thus inherent in the method since no preparations are required for contraception, other than insertion of the sponge (which can be done up to two days prior to intercourse). The VCS can be inserted and removed as desired by the user. In certain lesser developed countries where price is an extreme consideration, the product will undoubtedly be washed and reused, although this is not recommended since the spermicide can be depleted by repeated washings. Because of its material compliance, the VCS adapts to anatomical variations which are a function of the user and her daily activities. Currently, one size of the sponge is intended for all users.
Appropriate regulatory compliance filings have been made with the United States FDA, and the VCS is currently undergoing extensive clinical effectiveness evaluations. Once marketing approval has been obtained, the product will be sold as an over-the-counter (OTC) contraceptive. Initial marketing of the product outside the United States is scheduled for late 1980.
“There is no such thing as a problem without a gift for you in its hands. You seek problems because you need their gifts.” Richard Bach, ILLUSIONS
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Million Teenagers“, a pub. of the Alan Guttmacher Institute, 515 Madison Ave., New York, 1976.
Fertility and Contraception in the United States, Report prepared by the Select Committee on Population, U.S. House of Representatives, 95th Congress, 2nd Session, 12/78.
Blandau, R. & Moghissi, K., ed., The Biology of the Cervix, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973.
Epel, David, “The Program of Fertilization”, Sci. Am., 11/77, pp. 129–138.
Garcia, G. R. & Rosenfeld, D. L., Human Fertility: The Regulation of Reproduction, F. A. Davis Co., Phil., 1977.
Hafez, E. S. F. & Evans, T. N., editors, Human Reproduction, Conception and Contraception, Harper & Row, Hagerstown, MD., 1973.
Masters, W. H. & Johnson, V. E., Human Sexual Response, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1966.
Segal, S. J., “The Physiology of Human Reproduction”, Sci. Am., 9/74, pp. 53–62.
Taylor, H., ed., Human Reproduction, Vol. 1, Physiology, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1976.
Johnson, V. E. & Masters, W. H., “Intravaginal Contraceptives Study: Phase I. Anatomy”, Western J. Surg. Obstet. Gynecol., 7–8/62, p. 202.
Shapiro, H. I., The Birth Control Book, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1977.
Hatcher, R. A., et al, Contraceptive Technology, 1978–1979, John Wiley, Irvington Publishers, N.Y., 1978.
Population Report, Series A, #1–5, 9/75, Population Information Program, The Johns Hopkins Univ., 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, 21205.
Ibid, Series B, #2–3, 1/75.
Ibid, Series H, #1–5, 1/76.
Ibid, Series D, #1–3, 1/75.
Bender, S. J. & Fellers, S., Contraception, by Choice or by Chance, WM. C. Brawn Co., Dubuque, Io., 1971
Segal, S. J., “Advances and Opportunities in Fertility Research”, Mt. Sinai J. of Med., Vol XLII, #4, 7–8/75, pp. 375–383.
Hines, N. E., Medical History of Contraception, Schocken Books, N.Y., paperback, 1970.
Bernstein, E., “Update on the Pill: Does Reliability Outweigh Risk?”, Today’s Health, 3/76, p. 15.
FDA Drug Bulletin, “Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Users of Oral Contraceptives”, 7–8/75, p. 10.
Morrison, M., “Contraception with IUD’s”, FDA Consumer, 2/75, DHEW Pub. #75–4005.
Bernstein, G. S., “Physiological Aspects of Vaginal Contraception, A Review”, Contraception, Vol. 9, #4, 4/74, pp. 333–345.
Bernstein, G. S., “Coventional Methods of Contraception: Condom, Diaphragm, and Vaginal Foam”, Clin. Ob. Gyn,,Vol. 17, #1, 3/74, pp. 21–33.
Patent applications filed U.S. and foreign by VORHAUER LABORATORIES, INC.
Hypol 2001 Prepolymer, W. R. Grace and Co., Organic Chemicals Div., Lexington, NA.
Aznar, et. al., “Polyurethane Contraceptive Sponge: Product Modification Resulting from User Experience”, submitted to Contraception, 1980.
Wallin, R., “Safety Testing of Medical Devices, an Overview”, Ned. Dev. & Diag. Indust., Vol. 1, #6, 11/79, p. 25.
Chvapil, M., Personal CamnnZication to B. W. Vorhauer, 10/27/76.
Moran, J., et. al., “Comparison of the Fractional Post-coital Test with the Sims-Huhner Post-coital Test”, Int. J. Fertility, Vol. 19, 1974, p. 93.
Bernstein, G. S., “Laboratory Studies of the Release of Nonoxynol-9 from Polymeric Intravaginal Contraceptive Sponges”, submitted to Contraception, 1979.
Bernstein, G. S., et. al., paper in preparation for submission to Contraception, 1980.
Aznar, et. al., “A Clinical Appraisal of a Medicated Polyurethane Sponge Used for Contraception”, in Vaginal Contraceptives: New Developments, Zatuchni, G., et. al., editors, Harper and Row, Hagerstown, in Press.
Taylor, R., et. al., “Preliminary Results of a Multi-clinic Trial of a Polyurethane-Spermicide Contraceptive Sponge”, ibid.
Edelman, D. A., “Barrier Contraception - An Update”, presented at the Assoc. of Family Planning Physicians Meeting in Philadelphia, 10/79., and to be published in Advances in Planned Parenthood, 1980.
Biomedical Engineering Axiom No. 1 - Under carefully controlled experimental conditions, organisms behave pretty much as they please.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vorhauer, B.W. (1980). Human Reproduction: Bioengineering Aspects of Contraception Applied to the Development of a New Female Contraceptive. In: Schneck, D.J. (eds) Biofluid Mechanics · 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4610-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4610-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4612-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4610-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive