Advertisement

System Configurations

Evolutionary Deployment Considerations
  • Randolph W. Hall
Chapter

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to develop a framework by which system configurations can be defined for the purpose of Automated Highway System (AHS) cost/benefit analysis. This framework was used in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Precursor Systems Analyses (PSA) program. This framework was applied to a range of scenarios, to capture benefits and costs on a regional and national basis. The framework reflects risks and uncertainties with respect to such factors as market penetration, construction and vehicle costs, and public acceptance of new facilities.

Keywords

System Configuration Vehicle Type Intelligent Transportation System Market Penetration Lane Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Varaiya, Smart Cars on Smart Roads: Problems of Control, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 38 (2), 195–207 (1993).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. F. Heinrich, IVHS—An Automotive Perspective. Chrysler Corporation, SAE Technical Paper 912780, presented at the Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, Oct. 1991, Dearborn, MI.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. A. Place, IVHS—Auto Industry Perspective. Ford Motor Company, SAE Technical Paper 912781, Presented at the Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, Oct. 1991, Dearborn, MI.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. A., Johnston, M. A. DeLuchi, D. Sperling, AND P. P. Craig, Automating Urban Freeways: Policy Research Agenda. Presented at the ASCE International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation Engineering, San Diego, CA, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. W. Hall, Time Benefits of New Transportation Technologies: The Case of Highway Automation, Transp. Plann. Technol. 19, 1–17 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. W. Hall and J. H.-S. Tsao, AHS Deployment: A Preliminary Assessment of Uncertainties, PATH Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, PWP 94–2 (1994).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Ward, A Hypothesized Evolution of an Automated Highway System. For Federal Highway Administration Precursor Systems Analyses Program (1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Ioannou, M., Lai, J. Dickerson, and A. Kanaris, Evolutionary Representative System Configurations and Roadway, Vehicle, Driver Functions. Center for Advanced Transportation Technologies, University of Southern California, Report 94–06–01 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Al-Ayat and R. W. Hall, A Conceptual Approach for Developing and Analyzing Alternate Evolutionary Deployment Strategies for Intelligent Vehicle/Highway Systems, PATH Working Paper 94–5 (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. W. Hall, The Architecture of Transportation Systems, Transp. Res. C 3, 129–142 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. W. Hall, Cost/Benefit Analysis of Automated Highway Systems. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Contract DTFH61–93-C-001–99 (1994).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bechtel. Roadway Costs. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Contract DTFH61–93-C001–99 (1994).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rockwell, Electronics Cost Analysis. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Contract DTFH61–93-C-001–99 (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randolph W. Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations