Advertisement

Introduction

  • Harvey V. SamisJr.
Part of the Advances in experimental medicine and biology book series (AEMB, volume 108)

Abstract

A plethora of convincing evidence exists to support the view that temporal organization is a characteristic and genetically prescribed dimension of biological organization (Pittendrigh, 1961, 1954, 1958; Hastings, 1970; and for a review see Bünning, 1964). Temporal organization in the biome, therefore, does not stem from cyclic environmental phenomena but, to the contrary, has its genesis within the biological entity. This is not to say that the time structure is immutable by environmental factors. Environmental changes such as those in light and temperature can and do serve as signals to which the biological clocks are cued. If, as the evidence indicates, the time structure of organisms is genetically determined, it is reasonable to view it as a functional dimension of biological organization in which order is developed and in which order must be maintained by means of periodic re-establishment. It is, therefore, a dimension of biological organization in which disorder may also develop with functional consequences deleterious and, under certain circumstances, disasterous to the organism.

Keywords

Time Structure Biological Organization Biological Rhythm Temporal Organization Biological Clock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschoff, J. Tagesperiodik von Maeusestaemmen unter Konstanten Umgegungsbedingungen. Pflügers Arch. 262: 51–59, 1955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bünning, E. The Physiological Clock. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Bünning, E. The Physiological Clock. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Ehret, C.E. The sense of time: Evidence for its molecular basis on the eukaryotic gene-action system. Adv. Biol. Med. Phys. 15: 47–77, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gwinner, E. Testosterone induces “splitting” of circadian locomotor activity rhythms in birds. Science 185: 72–74, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halberg, F. Chronobiology. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 31: 675–725, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halberg, F. Quando Trattare — when to treat. Haematologica 60: 1–29, 1975a.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Halberg, F. When to treat. The Indian J. of Cancer 12: 1–20, 1975b.Google Scholar
  9. Halberg, F., Haus, E., Cardoso, S.S., Scheving, L.E., Kühl, J.F.W., Shiotsuka, R., Rosene, G., Pauly, J.E., Runge, W., Spalding, J.F., Lee, J.K. and Good, R.A. Toward a chronotherapy of neoplasia: Tolerance of treatment depends upon host rhythms. Experientia 29: 909–1044, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hastings, J.W. In: The Biological Clock: Two Views, F.A. Brown, J.W. Hastings and J.D. Palmer, eds. Academic Press, New York, pp 63–91, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. Pittendrigh, C.S. On temperature independence in the clock-system controlling emergence time in Drosophila. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 40: 1018–1029, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pittendrigh, C.S. Perspective in the study of biological clocks. In: Symposium on Marine Biology. Univ. of California Press, Berkely, 1958.Google Scholar
  13. Pittendrigh, C.S. On temporal organization in living systems. In: Harvey Lectures 56: 93–125, 1961.Google Scholar
  14. Reinberg, A. and Halberg, F. Circadian chronopharmacology. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. 2: 455–492, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Samis, H.V. Aging: The loss of temporal organization. Perspectives in Biol. Med. 12: 95, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey V. SamisJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Research Service Veterans Administration CenterBay PinesUSA

Personalised recommendations