Advertisement

Meta-Analysis for Environment-Behavior and Design Research, Illuminated with a Study of Lighting Level Effects on Office Task Performance

  • Robert Gifford
  • Donald W. Hine
  • Jennifer A. Veitch
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Environment, Behavior and Design book series (AEBD, volume 4)

Abstract

The dream of improving environmental design by collecting and examining the results of independent studies is as old as the field of environment and behavior. In her study of playgrounds, Lady Allen of Hurtwood (1969) asked: “[W]hy [are] so many expensive mistakes... made over and over again? One reason may be that there is no central body whose job it is to collect experience and research throughout the world, digest it, and make it readily available to architects and planners” (quoted in Sommer, 1972, p. 102). These and other authors have proposed a central repository for building designs, complemented with evaluations of the finished products. However, once these evaluation studies are collected, exactly how would they be combined or analyzed to determine what works and what does not? In other environment—behavior (EB) research areas, how might we quantitatively assess the outcome of any large or small series of studies on a given topic?

Keywords

Hypothesis Test Adaptation Period Combine Probability Average Effect Size File Drawer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello, J. R., Baum, A., & Gormley, F. B. (1981). Social determinants of residential crowding stress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 643 - 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belcher, M. C. (1985, February). Cultural aspects of illuminance levels. Lighting Design and Application, 15 (2), 49 - 50.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, C. A. (1986, August). Lighting, comfort, and performance in the workplace: Human-VDT interaction requires special considerations. Lighting Design and Application, 16 (8), 40 - 44.Google Scholar
  4. Boyce, P. R. (1981). Human factors in lighting. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Bullock, R. J., and Svyantek, D. J. (1985). Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 108 - 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences ( 2nd ed. ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, H. M. (1984). The integrative research review: A social science approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, H. M., and Rosenthal, R. (1980). Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing findings. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 442 - 449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiske, D. W. (1983). The meta-analysis revolution in outcome research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 65 - 70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gifford, R. (1987). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Gifford, R. (1988). Light, decor, arousal, comfort, and communication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8, 177 - 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Research, 5, 3 - 8.Google Scholar
  14. Glass, G., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., and Tomera, A. N. (1986-87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education,18(2), 1-8.Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, P. C., Sr McNelis, J. F. (1978, December). Lighting, productivity, and the work environment. Lighting Design and Application, 8 (12), 32 - 38.Google Scholar
  17. Hunter, J., Schmidt, F., and Jackson, G. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Hurtwood, Lady Allen of. (1969). Planning for play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. (1987). IES lighting handbook: 1987 application volume. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  20. Kantowitz, B. H., Sr Sorkin, R. D. (1983). Human factors: Understanding people-system relationships. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Landman, J. T., and Dawes, R. M. (1982). Psychotherapy outcome: Smith and Glass’ conclusions stand up under scrutiny. American Psychologist, 37, 504 - 516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landsberger, H. A. (1958). Hawthorne revisited. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lush, J. L. (1931). Predicting gains in feeder cattle and pigs. Journal of Agricultural Research, 42, 853 - 881.Google Scholar
  24. Cormick, E. J. (1976). Human factors in engineering and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Megaw, E. D., and Bellamy, L. J. (1983). Illumination at work. In D. J. Obome & M. M. Gruneberg (Eds.), The physical environment at work (pp. 109 - 141 ). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Mullen, B., and Felleman, V. (1990). Tripling in the dorms: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 33 - 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pansky, S. H. (1985, February). Lighting standards: Tracing the development of the lighting standard from 1939 to the present. Lighting Design and Application, 15 (2), 46 - 48.Google Scholar
  29. Roethlisberger, F. J., and Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rose, F. C., and Rostas, S. M. (1946). The effect of illumination on reading rate and comprehension of college students. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 279 - 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenthal, R. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology? American Psychologist, 45, 775 - 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (revised edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Rosnow, R., and Rosenthal, R. (1988). Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 35, 203 - 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothstein, H. R., and McDaniel, M. A. (1989). Guidelines for conducting and reporting meta-analyses. Psychological Reports, 65, 759 - 770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simonson, E., and Brozek, J. (1948). The effects of illumination level on visual performance and fatigue. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 38, 384 - 397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, S. W., and Rea, M. S. (1982, October). Performance of reading test under different levels of illumination. Journal of IES, 29 - 33.Google Scholar
  37. Snow, C. E. (1927). Research on industrial illumination. The Tech Engineering News, 8, 257 - 282.Google Scholar
  38. Sommer, R. (1972). Design awareness. San Francisco: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  39. Stouffer, S. A. (1949). The American soldier, Vol. 1: Adjustment during Army life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Strube, M. J., and Hartmann, D. P. (1983). Meta-analysis: Techniques, applications, and functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 14 - 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sundstrom, E. (1978). Crowding as a sequential process: Review of research on the effects of population density on humans. In A. Baum and Y. M. Epstein (Eds.), Human response to crowding (pp. 31 - 116 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Sundstrom, E. (1987). Work environments: Offices and factories. In D. Stokols and I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 733 - 782 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Tinker, M. A. (1939). The effect of illumination intensity upon speed of perception and upon fatigue in reading. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 561 - 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tinker, M. A. (1943). Illumination intensities for reading newspaper type. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 247 - 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tinker, M. A. (1951). Derived illumination specifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 377380.Google Scholar
  46. Tinker, M. A. (1952). The effect of intensity of illumination upon speed of reading six-point italic print. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 600 - 602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tinker, M. A. (1959). Brightness contrast, illumination intensity and visual efficiency. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 36, 221 - 236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Veitch, J. A. (1990). Office noise and illumination effects on reading comprehension. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 209 - 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Veitch, J. A., Hine, D. W., and Gifford, R. (1993). End users’ knowledge, beliefs, and preferences for lighting. Journal of Interior Design, 19 (2), 15 - 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wener, R. (1989). Advances in evaluation of the built environment. In E. H. Zube & G. T. Moore (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design (Vol. 2, pp. 287 - 313 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Gifford
    • 1
  • Donald W. Hine
    • 1
  • Jennifer A. Veitch
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.National Research Council of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations