Advertisement

Flow Through Mechanical Heart Valves and Thrombosis: Visualization by Washing Test

  • Bernard Brami
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 235)

Abstract

Since the emergence of the first Hufnagel valve about thirty years ago, valve prostheses have continuously, but slowly, been improved; however, such devices still are associated with a number of problems. The choice between mechanical and tissue valves is still controversial and it is clear that the ideal prosthetic valve does not as yet exist(1–3). With respect to mechanical valves there have been a number of stages in their development. The initial stage was characterized by the use of many improper valve designs, which led to disastrous consequences until the development in 1960 of the Starr-Edwards valve. This device proved safer than many earlier ones and consequently it became adopted by the surgical community. During this period, long term usage of these devices revealed several defects inherent to this type of prosthesis, specifically related to mechanical and thromboembolic failures. In 1973 pyrolitic carbon was developed for valve components. This material limited excessive valve wear and also reduced the level of thromboembolic events(4).

Keywords

Heart Valve Mechanical Valve Laser Doppler Anemometry Valve Prosthesis Mechanical Heart Valve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Acar J: Le choix entre les différents types de valves, L’information Cardiologique, 9: 307–308, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grunkemeier GL, Rahimtoola SH: Artificial heart valves, Ann. Rev. Med., 41: 251–263, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Symposium: 25 ans de protheses valvulaires cardiaques, L’information Cardiologique, Vol. 12, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bokros J, Haubold A, Shim H: Carbon in medical devices, In: Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials (Ed., Williams DR ), CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edmunds LH, Jr: Thrombotic and bleeding complications of prosthetic heart valves, Ann. Thorac. Surg., 44: 430–445, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farah E, Enriquez-Sarano M, Vahanian A, Houlegatte JP, Boubaker A, Roger V, Acar J: Thromboembolic and haemorrhagic risk in mechanical and biological aortic prostheses, Eur. Heart J. Suppl. D, 43–47, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright JTM: A flow visualization study of prosthetic and mitral heart valves in a model of the aorta and the left heart, Engeneering in Medicine, 6 (2): 31, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruss KH, Reul H, Van Gilse J, Knott E: Pressure and velocity fields at four mechanical heart valve prostheses. Björk-Shiley Standard Björk-Shiley Concave-Convex, Hall-Kaster and St. Jude Medical, Life Support Syst., 1: 3–15, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farahifar D, Cassot F, Bodard H, Pelissier R: Velocity profiles in the wake of two prosthetic heart valves using a new cardiovascular simulator, J. Biomech., 18: 789–802, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yoganathan AP, Corcoran WH, Harrison EC: In vitro velocity measurements in the near vicinity of aortic valve prostheses, J. Biomech., 12: 135–152, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rebuffet P: Aerodynamique Experimentale, Tome 2, Dunod, Paris, 1969.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grunkemeier GL, Starr A: Twenty five year experience with Starr-Edwards heart valves: follow-up methods and results, Can. J. Cardiol., 4: 381–385, 1988.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindblom D: Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 95: 568–577, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lelguen C, Fernandez F, Gerbaux A, Neveux E, Bickert P, Maurice P, Louvet J, Farah E, Acar J: Thromboses tardives sur protheses mitrales, Arch. Mal. Coeur., 72 (7): 730–738, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Modi VK, Akutsu T: Flow visualization studies with Starr-Edwards heart valve prosthesis. Flow visualization II, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, 593–597, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yoganathan AP, Reamer HH, Corcoran WH, Harrison EC, Schulman TA, Parnassus W: The Starr-Edwards aortic ball-valve: flow characteristics, thrombus formation and tissue overgrowth, Artificials Organs, 5 (1): 6–17, 1981.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sabbagh AH: Clotted Björk-Shiley mitral valve prostheses: early detection and surgical management, Cardiovasc. Cent. Bull., Apr-Jun, 21 (4): 101–107, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright JO, Hiratzka LF, Brandt B, Doty DB: Thrombosis of the Bjôrk-Shiley prosthesis: illustrative cases and review of the litterature, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., Jul, 84 (1): 139–144, 1982.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoganathan AP, Corcoran WH, Harrison EC, Carl JR: The Bjôrk-Shiley aortic prosthesis flow chracteristics, thrombus formation and tissue overgrowth, Circulation, 58 (1): 70, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Brami
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre d’Etudes Coeur et FluidesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations