Advertisement

Psychosocial and Religious Aspects of Medical Ethics

  • E. Mansell Pattison

Abstract

The Second World War convulsed the world both physically and morally. In the aftermath came a determined attempt to assess a world moral order. The Nuremburg war crimes trials were the focus of this reassessment in which two opposing moral positions were brought face to face. The defendants argued that they were implementing the laws of the land; the prosecution argued that certain basic human rights and responsibilities were self-evident and inviolable. The issue was clear: Are there universal norms of human morality or does each society construct its own relative system of morality?

Keywords

Medical Ethic Social Enterprise Professional Role Religious Institution Social Consensus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W., E. Frenkel-Brunswick, D. J. Levinson, and R. N. Sanford. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York, Harper.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, R. T. 1965. Sources of medical morals. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 193: 133138.Google Scholar
  3. Blumgart, H. L. 1964. Caring for the patient. New Engl. J. Med. 270: 449–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erikson, E. H. 1963. The Golden Rule and the Cycle of Life. Harvard Medical Alumni Bulletin (winter).Google Scholar
  5. Kass, L. R. 1972. Death as an event. Science. 173: 698–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kluckhohn, C. 1966. Introduction. In: Reader in Comparative Religion: An Antropological Approach. W. A. Lessa and E. Z. Vogt, eds. 2d ed. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Kohlberg, L. 1964. Development of moral character and moral ideology. In: Review of Child Development Research. M. D. Hoffman and L. W. Hoffman, eds. Vol. I. New York, Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Lasagna, L. 1965. The mind and morality of the doctor. II. The physician and the microcosm. Yale J. Biol. Med. 37: 361–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Levine, M. 1948. The Hippocratic Oath in modern dress. Cincinnati J. Med. 29: 257–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin, D., and L. Wrightsman. 1964. Religion and fears about death; a critical review of research. Religious Education. 59: 174–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morison, R. S. 1972. Death: process or event? Science. 173: 694–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pattison, E. M. 1968. Ego morality: an emerging psychotherapeutic concept. Psychoanalytic Rev. 55: 187–222.Google Scholar
  13. Pattison, E. M. 1969. Clinical Psychiatry and Religion. Boston, Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  14. Pattison, E. M. 1972. Help in the dying process. In: American Handbook of Psychiatry. Rev. ed. S. Arieti, ed. New York, Basic Books. In press.Google Scholar
  15. Peabody, F. W. 1927. The care of the patient. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 88: 877–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rieff, P. 1966. The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  17. Rokeach, M. 1969. Religious values and social compassion. Rev. Religious Research 11: 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shapiro, A. K. 1960. A contribution to a history of the placebo effect. Behavioral Sci. 5: 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spilka, R., R. J. Pelligrini, and K. Dailey. 1968. Religion: American values and death perspective. Sociological Symposium. 1: 57–66.Google Scholar
  20. Szasz, T. S., and M. H. Hollender. 1956. A contribution to the philosophy of medicine: three basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. Arch. Int. Med. 97: 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Mansell Pattison

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations