Advertisement

Spontaneous Activity of Auditory Afferent Neurones in the Spiral Ganglion of the Pigeon

  • Anthony W. Gummer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 87)

Abstract

In the avian (Manley, 1979; Manley and Gleich, 1984; Manley et al., 1985; Temchin, 1988) and reptilian (Crawford and Fettiplace, 1980; Eatock et aI., 1981) auditory nerves there exists a population of afferent fibres which exhibit quasiperiodic spontaneous activity. The interval histogram of such activity shows decaying maxima, separated at approximately equal intervals, named the preferred interval by Manley (1979). These histograms contrast with those reported for other species (e.g. Kiang, 1965; Walsh et al., 1972; Robertson and Manley, 1974), and with the balance of histograms from other fibres in birds and reptiles, where after an absolute refractory period the interval histogram decays exponentially from it’s modal value, as if generated by a truncated, homogeneous Poisson process. However, for quasiperiodic spontaneous activity both the modal interval and the preferred interval are related to the characteristic frequency (CF) of the neurone. Earlier reports (Manley, 1979; Crawford and Fettiplace, 1980; Eatock et al., 1981), as well as the one by Temchin(1988), report that the modal and preferred intervals are approximately equal to the CF-period, whereas the more recent papers from Manley and coworkers (Manley and Gleich, 1984; Manley et al., 1985) maintain that these intervals are on average 15% longer than the CF-period. In these papers Manley estimated the preferred interval as the weighted average of the intervals of the second and higher maxima of the interval histogram, whereas Temchin(1988) calculated it from the number of minima in a specified time frame of the autocorrelation histogram.

Keywords

Hair Cell Spontaneous Activity Spiral Ganglion Successive Interval Modal Interval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1965) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, N.T J. (1967) The elements of Stochastic Processes. 1. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bi, Q., Brown, J.L. Jr. and Lachs, G. (1988) Statistical expectation of the interval histograms from marginal time statistics of the Poisson process. J. Acousl. Soc. Am. 83, 1186–1189.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D.R and Miller, H.D. (1968) The Theory of Stochastic Processes. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  5. Crawford, A.C. and Fettiplace, R (1980) The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle. J. Physiol. 306, 79 - 115.Google Scholar
  6. Eatock, R.A., Manley, G.A. and Pawson, L. (1981) Auditory nerve fibre activity in the Tokay Gecko. I. Implications for cochlear processing. J. Comp. Physiol. 142, 203–218.Google Scholar
  7. Flock, A. and Russell, I. (1976) Inhibition by efferent nerve fibres: Action on hair cells and afferent synaptic transmission in the lateral line canal organ of the burbot LoUllota. J. Physiol. 157, 45–62.Google Scholar
  8. Gummer, A.W., Smolders, J.W.T. and Klinke, R. (1987) Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Moessbauer technique. Hear. Res. 29, 63–92.Google Scholar
  9. Hill, K.G., Stange, G., Gummer, AW. and Mo, J. (1989) A model proposing synaptic and extra-synaptic influences on the responses of cochlear nerve fibres. Hear. Res. 39, 75–90.Google Scholar
  10. Johannesma, P.I.M. (1969) Diffusion models for the stochastic activity of neurons. In: Neural Networks (Ed: Caianiello, E.R) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 116 - 144.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, D.H. (1974) The Response of Single Auditory-Nerve Fibers in the Cat to Single Tones: SynChrony and Average Discharge Rate. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  12. Kiang, N.Y.-S. (1965) Discharge Patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Manley, G.A. (1979) Preferred intervals in the spontaneous activity of primary auditory neurons. Naturwissen. 66, 582 - 584.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manley, G.A. and Gleich, O. (1984) Avian primary auditory neurons. Naturwissen. 71, 592 - 594.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manley, G.A., Gleich, O., Leppelsack, H.-J. and Oeckinghaus, H. (1985) Activity patterns of cochlear ganglion neurones in the starling. J. Comp. Physiol. A 157, 161-181.Google Scholar
  16. Robertson, D. and Manley, G.A. (1974) Manipulation of frequency analysis in the cochlear ganglion of the guinea pig. J. Comp. Physiol. 91, 363–375.Google Scholar
  17. Siebert, W.M. (1970) Frequency discrimination in the auditory system: place or periodicity mechanisms? Proc. IEEE 58, 723 - 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stein, R.B. (1965) A theoretical analysis of neuronal variability. Biophys. J. 5, 173-194.Google Scholar
  19. Synder, D.L. (1975). Random Point Processes. J. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Temchin, A.N. (1988) Unusual discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon’s auditory nerve. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163, 99-115.Google Scholar
  21. Walsh, B.T., Miller, J.B., Gacek, RR and Kiang, N.Y.-S. (1972) Spontaneous activity in the eighth cranial nerve of the cat. Intern. J. Neurosci. 3, 221–236.Google Scholar
  22. Wilbur, W J. and Rinzel, J. (1982) An analysis of Stein’s model for stochastic neuronal excitation. BioI. Cybern. 45, 107–114.Google Scholar
  23. Wolberg, J.R (1967) Prediction Analysis. D. van Nostrand, New Jersey.MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Gleich, O. (1988). Doctoral Thesis, Department of Zoology, Technical University, Munich.Google Scholar
  25. Narins, P.M., Gleich, O. (1986). Phase response of low-frequency cochlear ganglion cells in the starling. In: Auditory Frequency Selectivity (Ed: Moore, B.C.J., and Patterson, R.D.) Plenum Pub. Co., pp. 209 - 216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony W. Gummer
    • 1
  1. 1.Developmental Neurobiology GroupThe Australian National University, Research School of Biological SciencesCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations