Advertisement

Time and Life

  • Klaus Mainzer
Chapter
Part of the Little book series book series (LBS)

Abstract

The thermodynamic concept of time is directly applicable to the discussion of life processes. Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer’s theory of evolution for the first time related growth and life to developing complexity. The evolution of life is revealed as an irreversible temporal development of complex systems. In the framework of nonequilibrium thermodynamics, evolution can be understood in terms of symmetry breaking. This lies at the root of life’s time arrow. But many different biological temporal rhythms must be distinguished. In the course of evolution, these rhythms were superimposed on each other into complex time hierarchies, encompassing everything from elaborate economic systems to single living organisms.

Keywords

Symmetry Breaking Bifurcation Diagram Life Process Nonequilibrium Thermodynamic Complex Dynamic System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreski, Herbert Spencer: Structure, Function, and Evolution ( London: Michael Joseph, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomson, Mathematical and Physical Papers Vol. 5 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1882–1911), 21–23.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fischer and Mainzer, Die Frage nach dens Leben (Munich, Germany: Piper, 1990 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eigen and Schuster, The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization ( New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haken, Synergetics: An Introduction (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2nd ed. 1978); Mainzer, Symmetries of Nature: A Handbook for Philosophy of Nature and Science (New York: Walter De Gruyter, 1996); Mainzer, Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind (New York: Springer-Verlag, 3rd ed. 1997); Prigogine, From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in Physical Sciences (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1981). Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prigogine, “Order Through Fluctuation: Self-Organization and Social System,” Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition, eds. Jantsch and Waddington ( Boston: Addison Wesley, 1976 ), 93–126.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turing, “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 237, no. 641 (1952): 37–72; Gerisch, “Periodische Signale steuern Musterbildung in Zeltverbänden,” Naturwissenschaften 58 (1971): 430–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hess and Markus, “Chemische Uhren,” Selbstorganisation: Die Entstehung von Ordnung in Natur und Gesellschaft, eds. Dress, Endrichs, and Köppers ( Munich, Germany: Piper, 1986 ), 61–79.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mainzer, “Chaos und Selbstorganisation als medizinische Paradigmen,” Wissenschaftstheorien in der Medizin, eds. Deppert, Kliemt, Lohff, and Schaefer ( Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter: 1992 ), 225–58.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winfree, When Time Breaks Down: The Three-Dimensional Dynamics of Electrochemical Waves and Cardiac Arrhythmias (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press: 1987 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Mainzer
    • 1
  1. 1.AugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations