## Abstract

- 1)
Unlike the reflection process in pseudo-steady flows, where it is coupled with an additional process, namely, the flow deflection process (see section 2.6.1), in steady flows the reflection process is independent.

- 2)
Unlike the analysis of the reflection process in pseudo-steady flows, where there is a need to analytically predict the first triple point trajectory angle, χ, in order to transform the results from the (M

_{s}, \(\theta _w^c\))-plane to the more physically meaningful and more applicable (M_{s}, θ_{w})-plane, in steady flows the results are presented in the (M_{0},ø_{1})-plane. The presentation of the results in this plane can be done by solving equations (1.14) to (1.27) without the need for an additional expression for χ [equation (2.33)] as discussed in section 2.2.1. - 3)
Of the ten different shock wave reflection configurations mentioned in section 1.1 only two, namely, RR and SMR, are possible in steady flows.

## Keywords

Shock Wave Triple Point Incident Shock Incident Shock Wave Reflection Point## List of Symbols

## Latin Letters

- k
thermal conductivity

- L
_{m} length of the Mach stem

- L
_{w} length of the reflecting wedge

- M
_{i} flow Mach number in state (i)

- M
_{s} incident shock wave Mach number

- p
_{i} static pressure in state (i)

- u
_{i} flow velocity in state (i)

## Greek Letters

- γ
specific heat capacities ratio

- δ
_{max}(M) maximum deflection angle for a flow having Mach number M through an oblique shock wave

- θ
_{w} reflecting wedge angle

- γ
_{w}^{C} complementary wedge angle

- μ
dynamic viscosity

- μ
_{i} Mach angle of the flow having a Mach number M

_{i}- ρ
_{i} flow density in state (i)

- Φ
_{i} angle of incidence between the flow and the oblique shock wave across which the flow enters state (i)

- Φ
^{i} limiting angle of incidence

## Subscripts

- 0
flow state ahead of the incident shock wave, i.

- 1
flow state behind the incident shock wave, i.

- 2
flow state behind the reflected shock wave, r.

- 3
flow state behind the Mach stem, m.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Reference

- Azevedo, D.J., “Analytic Prediction of Shock Patterns in a High-Speed, Wedge-Bounded Duct”, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. Mech. & Aero. Eng., State Univ. N.Y. Buffalo, N.Y., U.S.A., 1989.Google Scholar
- Henderson, L.F., “The Reflection of a Shock Wave at a Rigid Wall in the Presence of a Boundary Layer”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 30, pp. 699–722, 1967.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Henderson, L.F. & Lozzi, A., “Experiments of Transition to Mach Reflection”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 68, pp. 139–155, 1975.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Henderson, L.F. & Lozzi, A., “Further Experiments of Transition to Mach Reflection”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 94, pp. 541–560, 1979.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hornung, H.G., Oertel, H. Jr. & Sandeman, R.J., “Transition to Mach Reflection of Shock Waves in Steady and Pseudo-Steady Flow with and without Relaxation”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 90, pp. 541–560, 1979.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hornung, H.G. & Robinson, M.L., “Transition from Regular to Mach Reflection of Shock Waves. Part 2. The Steady-Flow Criterion”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 123, pp. 155–164, 1982.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mölder, S., “Reflection of Curved Shock Waves in Steady Supersonic Flow”, CASI Trans., Vol. 4, pp. 73–80, 1971.Google Scholar
- Mölder, S., “Particular Conditions for the Termination of Regular Reflection of Shock Waves”, CASI Trans., Vol. 25, pp. 44–49, 1979.Google Scholar
- Pant, J.C., “Reflection of a Curved Shock from a Straight Rigid Boundary”, Phys. Fluids, Vol. 14, pp. 534–538, 1971.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro, A.H.,
*The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Vol.*II, The Ronald Press Co., New York, N.Y., U.S.A., 1953.Google Scholar