Advertisement

Epidemiology of Breastfeeding

Advances and Multidisciplinary Applications
  • Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
  • M. Lourdes Guerrero
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 554)

Abstract

Advancing understanding of the importance of breastfeeding (BF) has required advances in application of epidemiologic methods to BF research. This chapter considers, in the context of BF epidemiology, how different research designs complement each other to establish firmer causal inferences, the need for multidisciplinary collaborations, and the application of powerful analytical methods to strengthen epidemiologic studies. A recent global meta-analysis of 47 studies documenting the inverse association between lifetime BF duration and breast cancer risk illustrates the value of longitudinal (cohort) studies to establish the temporal sequence of events and to rule out differential recall biases that can threaten the internal validity of case-control studies. The discovery of the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) via human milk has led epidemiologists to provide important hypotheses to be tested at the molecular and cellular level and in turn test hypotheses generated in laboratory studies. Application of powerful statistical methods to BF epidemiology has helped strengthen causal inferences. A retrospective analysis of the 1976–1977 Malaysian Family Life Survey found interactive multivariate statistical models to better understand how different socioeconomic and cultural contexts modify the influence of BF on child health. Further, a study conducted in Cebu City, Philippines, demonstrated how structural equation models can be used to test the pathways through which proximate (e.g., BF) and distal (e.g., socioeconomic status) determinants affect child health after adjusting for reverse causality (i.e., child health influencing maternal BF choice). For ethical reasons, BF randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have seldom been conducted. Recent RCTs examining the link between BF peer counseling and BF outcomes in diverse settings provides a unique opportunity to firmly establish the causal inferences regarding BF and the prevention of diarrheal diseases. The value of rapid assessment anthropologic methods to guide development of peer counseling interventions subsequently tested through RCTs is presented. This chapter also illustrates how Cox regression and logistic regression can be applied to BF research.

Keywords

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Breast Cancer Risk Human Milk Reverse Causality Survey Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benno Y, Sawada L, Mitsuoka T. The intestinal microflora of infants: composition of fecal flora in breastfed and bottlefed infants. Microbiol Immunol 1984;28:975–986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. Brown KH, Black RE, Lopez de Romana G, Creed de Kanashiro H. Infant-feeding practices and their relationship with diarrheal and other diseases in Huascar (Lima), Peru. Pediatrics 1989;83:31–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaturvedi P, Warren CD, Altaye M, Morrow AL, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Pickering LK, Newburg DS. Fucosylated human milk oligosaccharides vary between individuals and over the course of lactation. Glycobiology 2001;11:365–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet 2002;360:187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coutsoudis A, Goga AE, Rollins N, Coovadia HM, The Child Health Group. Free formula milk for infants of HIV-infected women: blessing or curse? Health Policy Plan 2002;17:154–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [CST] The Cebu Study Team. Underlying and proximate determinants of child health: The Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:185–201.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman AS. The immune system of human milk: antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;12:664–671.Google Scholar
  9. Gove S, Pelto GH. Focused ethnographic studies in the WHO Programme for the Control of Acute Respiratory Infections. Med Anthropol 1994;15:409–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Grummer-Strawn LM. The effect of changes in population characteristics on breastfeeding trends in fifteen developing countries. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:94–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guerrero ML, Morrow RC, Calva JJ, Ortega-Gallegos H, Weller SC, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Morrow AL. Rapid ethnographic assessment of breastfeeding practices in periurban Mexico City. Bull World Health Organ 1999;77:323–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Habicht JP, DaVanzo J, Butz WP. Does breastfeeding really save lives, or are apparent benefits due to biases? Am J Epidemiol 1986;123:279–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Habicht JP, DaVanzo J, Butz WP. Mother’s milk and sewage: Their interactive effects on infant mortality. Pediatrics 1998;81:456–461.Google Scholar
  14. Habicht JP. The association between prolonged breastfeeding and poor growth—what are the implications? Adv Exp Med Biol 2000;478:193–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Haider R, Ashworth A, Kabir I, Huttly SR. Effect of community-based peer counsellors on exclusive breastfeeding practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;356:1643–1647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little Brown, 1987; pp 3–29.Google Scholar
  17. Hundt GA, Forman MR. Interfacing anthropology and epidemiology: the Bedouin Arab infant feeding study. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:957–964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [IRD/MI] Institute for Resource Development/Macro International. An Assessment of Demographic and Health Surveys-I: Data Quality. Calverton, MD; 1990.Google Scholar
  19. [IRD/MI] Institute for Resource Development/Macro International. Proceedings of the Demographic and Health Surveys World Conference. Washington, DC; August 5–7,1991.Google Scholar
  20. Ishizaka S, Kimoto M, Tsujii T, Saito S. Antibody production system modulated by oral administration of human milk and TGF-β. Cell Immunol 1994;159:77–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett ED, Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Shapiro S, Collet JP, Vanilovich I, Mezen I, Ducruet T, Shishko G, Zubovich V, Mknuik D, Gluchanina E, Dombrovskiy V, Ustinovitch A, Kot T, Bogdanovich N, Ovchinikova L, Helsing E; PROBIT Study Group. Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA 2001;285:413–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lutter CK, Pérez-Escamilla R, Segall A, Teruya K, Sanghvi T, Fiedler J, Wickham C. Effectiveness of a hospital-based breastfeeding promotion program on exclusive breastfeeding among low-income women in Brazil. Am J Public Health 1997;87:659–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marquis GS, Habicht JP, Lanata CF, Black RE, Rasmussen KM. Association of breastfeeding and stunting in Peruvian toddlers: an example of reverse causality. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:349–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrow AL, Guerrero ML. From bioactive substances to research on breast-feeding promotion. Adv Exp Med Biol 2001;501:447–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrow AL, Pickering LK. Human milk and infectious diseases. In: Long S, Pickering LK, Prober CG, editors. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1997; pp 87–95.Google Scholar
  26. Morrow AL, Guerrero ML, Shults J, Calva JJ, Lutter C, Bravo J, Ruiz-Palacios G, Morrow RC, Butterfoss FD. Efficacy of home-based peer counseling to promote exclusive breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:1226–1231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newburg DS, Neubauer SH. Carbohydrates in milks: analysis, quantities, and significance. In: Jensen RG, editor. Handbook of Milk Composition. Orlando: Academic Press, 1995; pp 273–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Campo P, Guyer B, Squires B, Weiss J, Sweitzer J, Coyle T. Needs assessment for reducing infant mortality in Baltimore City: the Healthy Start Program. South Med J 1993;86:1342–1349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pérez-Escamilla R. Promotion of breastfeeding in the AIDS era. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2001;9:357–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pérez-Escamilla R, Maulén-Radován I, Dewey KG. Association between cesarean delivery and breastfeeding outcomes among Mexican women. Am J Public Health 1996a;86:832–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pérez-Escamilla R, Segura-Millán S, Canahuati J, Allen, H. Prelacteal feeds are negatively associated with breastfeeding outcomes in Honduras. J Nutr 1996b; 126:2765–2773.Google Scholar
  32. Pérez-Escamilla R, Lutter C, Wickham C, Phillips M, Trevino-Siller S, Sanghvi T. Identification of risk factors for shorter breastfeeding durations in Mexico City through survival analysis. Ecol Food Nutr 1997;36:43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pérez-Escamilla R, Cobas JA, Balcazar H, Holland Benin M. Specifying the antecedents of breast-feeding duration in Peru through a structural equation model. Public Health Nutr 1999;2:461–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pérez-Escamilla R, Grajeda R. Breastfeeding trends across time in Latin America: Results from the Demographic and Health Surveys. Experimental Biology Meetings, New Orleans, LA; April 20–24, 2002 (Abstract #2752).Google Scholar
  35. Pickering LK, Morrow AL. Factors in human milk that protect against diarrheal disease. Infection 1993;21:355–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raftery AE, Tanner MA, Wells MT, editors. Statistics in the 21st Century. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability no. 93, 2002.Google Scholar
  37. Scrimshaw SC, Carballo M, Ramos L, Blair BA. The AIDS rapid anthropological assessment procedures: a tool for health education planning and evaluation. Health Edu Q 1991; 18:111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seilen DW. Sub-optimal breast feeding practices: ethnographic approaches to building “baby friendly” communities. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;503:223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simondon KB, Costes R, Delaunay V, Diallo A, Simondon F. Children’s height, health and appetite influence mothers’ weaning decisions in rural Senegal. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:476–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stanton B, Black R, Engle P, Pelto G. Theory-driven behavioural intervention research for the control of diarrheal diseases, Soc Sci Med 1992;35:1405–1420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
    • 1
  • M. Lourdes Guerrero
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Nutritional SciencesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of Medical Sciences & NutritionMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations