Advertisement

Abstract

Each age defines education in terms of the meanings it gives to teaching and learning, and those meanings arise in part from the metaphors used to characterise teachers and learners. In the ancient world, one of the defining technologies (Bolter, 1984) was the potter’s wheel. The student’s mind became clay in the hands of the teacher. In the time of Descartes and Leibniz, the defining technology was the mechanical clock. The human being became a sort of clockwork mechanism whose mind either was an immaterial substance separate from the body (Descartes) or was itself a preprogrammed mechanism (Leibniz). The mind has also, at various times, been modelled as a wax tablet, a steam engine and a telephone switchboard.

Keywords

Mathematics Education Mathematics Teacher Cognitive Science Recursive Function Educational Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, L.M., Brubaker, N.L., Alleman-Brooks, J., and Duffy, G.G. (1984). Making seatwork work (Research Series No. 142 ). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, J.R., and White, R.T. ( 1984, April). `Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study’. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, F.C. (1967). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauersfeld, H. (1979). `Research related to the mathematical learning process’. In B. Christiansen and H.G. Steiner (Eds.), New trends in mathematics teaching (Vol. 4, pp. 199–213 ). Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
  5. Bauersfeld, H. (1983). ‘Subjektive Erfahrungsbereiche als Grundlage einer Interaktionstheorie des Mathematiklernens und -lehrens’ [Domains of subjective experiences as the basis for an interactive theory of mathematics learning and teaching]. In Untersuchungen zum Mathematikunterricht: Vol. 6. Lernen und Lehren von Mathematik (pp. 1–56 ). Koln: Aulis-Verlag Deubner.Google Scholar
  6. Begle, E.G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education: Findings from a survey of the empirical literature. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  7. Bolter, J.D. (1984). Turing’s man: Western culture in the computer age Google Scholar
  8. Borkowski, J.G., and Krause, A. (1983). `Racial differences in intelligence: The importance of the executive system.’ Intelligence Vol. 7, pp. 379–395 Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A.L. (1978). `Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition’. In R. Glaser (Ed.) Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A.L. (in press). `Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other even more mysterious mechanisms’. In F.E. Weinert and R.H. Kluwe (Eds.) Learning by thinking. West Germany: Kuhlhammer Google Scholar
  11. Brown, A.L., and Palincsar, A.S. (1982). `Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training’ Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1–17 Google Scholar
  12. Brown, S.I. (1983). [Review of Mindstorms: Children computers and power ful ideas.] Problem Solving Vol. 5 No. 7/8, pp. 3–6 Google Scholar
  13. Campione, J.C., and Brown, A.L. (1978). `Toward a theory of intelligence: Contributions from research with retarded children’ Intelligence Vol. 2, pp. 279–304 Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, J.B. (1976). `Psychometric tests as cognitive tasks: A new `structure of intellect’. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.) The nature of intelligence (pp. 27–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar
  15. Case, R. (1974). `Structures and strictures: Some functional limitations on theGoogle Scholar
  16. course of cognitive growth’. Cognitive Psychology, Vol 6, pp. 544–574. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations New ork: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, D., and Clancy, M. (1982). Oh! Pascal New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Cutland, N. (1980). Computability: An introduction to recursive function theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, R.B. (1983). `Complex mathematical cognition’. In H.P. Ginsberg (Ed.) The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 253–290). New York: Academic Press Google Scholar
  20. Davis, R.B. and McKnight, C.C. (1979). `Modeling the processes of mathematical thinking’ Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 91–113 Google Scholar
  21. Davis, R.M. (1977). `Evolution of computers and computing’ ScienceNo. 195, pp. 1096–1102 Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
  23. Dictionary of scientific and technical terms (2nd ed.). (1978). New York: McGraw-Hill Google Scholar
  24. Easley, J. (1984). `Is there educative power in students’ alternative frameworks - or else, what’s a poor teacher to do?’ Problem Solving, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp 1–4.Google Scholar
  25. Eco, U. (1983). The name of the rose (W. Weaver, Trans.). New York: Warner Books. (Original work published 1980) Google Scholar
  26. Editorial Board of Educational Studies in Mathematics. (Eds.) (1969) Proceedings of the First International Congress on Mathematical Education Lyon 24–30 August 1969. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Google Scholar
  27. Fischer, G., Burton, R.E., and Brown, J.S. (1978). Aspects of a theory of simplification, debugging, and coaching (BBN Report No. 3912).Google Scholar
  28. Flavell, J.H. (1976). `Metacognitive aspects of problem solving’. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.) The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar
  29. Flavell, J.H. (1979). `Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry’ American PsychologistVol. 34, pp. 906–911 Google Scholar
  30. Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Freudenthal, H. (1978). Weeding and sowing: Preface to a science of mathematical education. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.Google Scholar
  32. Freudenthal, H. (1981a). `Major problems of mathematics education’ Educational Studies in Mathematics12, pp. 133–150 Google Scholar
  33. Freudenthal, H. (1981b). `Should a mathematics teacher know something about the history of mathematics?’ For the Learning of Mathematics2(1), pp. 30–33 Google Scholar
  34. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.Google Scholar
  35. Fuys, D., Geddes, D., and Tischler, R. (Eds.). (1984). English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele. New York: Brooklyn College, School of Education.Google Scholar
  36. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Garofalo, J., and Lester, F.K., Jr. (1984). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring and mathematical performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  38. Genkins, E.F. (1975). `The concept of bilateral symmetry in young children’. In M.F. Rosskopf (Ed.) Children’s mathematical concepts: Six Piagetian studies in mathematics education (pp. 5–43). New York: Teachers College Press Google Scholar
  39. Gitomer, D.H., and Glaser, R. (in press). `If you don’t know it, work on it: Knowledge, self-regulation and instruction’. In R.E. Snow and J. Farr (Eds.) Aptitude learning and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar
  40. Hawkins, D. (1973). `Nature, man and mathematics’. In. A.G. Howson (Ed.) Developments in mathematics education: Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 115–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
  41. Hayes-Roth, B., and Hayes-Roth, F. (1979). `A cognitive model of planning’ Cognitive ScienceVol. 3 pp. 275–310 Google Scholar
  42. Hilton, P. (1984). `Current trends in mathematics and future trends in mathematics education’ For the Learning of MathematicsVol. 4 No. 1, pp. 2–8 Google Scholar
  43. Hofstadter, D.R. (1979). Godel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Hofstadter, D.R., and Dennett, D.C. (1981) The mind’s I: Fantasies and reflections on self and soul. New York: Bantam Google Scholar
  45. Jahnke, H.N. (1983). `Technology and education: The example of the computer’ [Review of Mindstorms: Children computers and powerful ideas]. Educational Studies in MathematicsVol. 14, pp. 87–100 Google Scholar
  46. Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  47. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983a). `A computational analysis of consciousness’. Cognition and Brain Theory, Vol. 6, pp. 499–508.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983b). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lawler, R.W. (1981). `The progressive construction of mind’. Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levinas, E. (1973). The theory of intuition in Husserl’s phenomenology (A. Orianne, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. ( Original work published 1963 )Google Scholar
  51. Locke, J. (1965). An essay concerning human understanding (Vol. 1). New York: Dutton. (Original work published 1706 )Google Scholar
  52. Loper, A.B. (1982). `Metacognitive training to correct academic deficiency’. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 61–68.Google Scholar
  53. Mandler, G. (1975). `Consciousness: Repectable, useful, and probably necessary’. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 229–254 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Maurer, S.B. (1983). The effects of a new college mathematics curriculum on high school mathematics. In A. Ralston and G.S. Young (Eds.), The future of college mathematics: Proceedings of a conference/workshop on the first two years of college mathematics (pp. 153–173 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCarthy, J. (1983). `Recursion’. In A. Ralston and E.D. Reilly, Jr. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of computer science and engineering (2nd ed., pp. 12731275 ). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  56. McCloskey, M. (1983, April). `Intuitive physics’. Scientific American, pp. 122–130.Google Scholar
  57. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). Consciousness and the acquisition of language (H.J. Silverman, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. ( Original work published 1964 )Google Scholar
  58. Minsky, M. (1980). `K-lines: A theory of memory’. Cognitive Science, Vol. 4, pp. 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Möbius, A.F. (1967). Gesammelte Werke [Collected works] (Vol. 1). Wiesbaden: Martin Sandig. (Original work published 1885 )Google Scholar
  60. Natsoulas, T. (1983). `A selective review of conceptions of consciousness with special reference to behavioristic contributions’. Cognition and Brain Theory, Vol. 6, pp. 417–447.Google Scholar
  61. Newell, A., and Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Newman, J.H.C. (1903). An essay in aid of a grammar of assent. London: Longmans, Green. (Original work published 1870 )Google Scholar
  63. Papert, S. (1975). `Teaching children thinking’. Journal of Structural Learning, Vol. 4, pp. 219–229.Google Scholar
  64. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  65. Peter, R. (1967). Recursive functions (3rd ed.). New York: Academic Press. Piaget, J. (1956). `Les étages du developpement intellectuel de l’enfant et de l’adolescent’ [The stages of intellectual development in the child and theGoogle Scholar
  66. Adolescent]. In P. Osterrieth et al., Le probleme des stages en psychologie de l’enfant (pp. 33–41). Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
  67. Piaget, J. (1971a). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). New York: Viking. (Original work published 1969 )Google Scholar
  68. Piaget, J. (1971b). `The theory of stages in cognitive development’. In D.R. Green (Ed.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 1–11 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  69. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child (S. Wedgwood, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ( Original work published 1974 )Google Scholar
  70. Piaget, J. (1978). Success and understanding (A.J. Pomerans, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ( Original work published 1974 )Google Scholar
  71. Pinard, A., and Laurendeau, M. (1969). “Stage’ in Piaget’s cognitive-developmental theory: Exegesis of a concept’. In D. Elkind and J.H. Flavell (Eds.), Studies in cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jean Piaget (pp. 121–170 ). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Polya, G. (1983). `Mathematics promotes the mind’. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, and M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (p. 1 ). Boston: Birkhauser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rappaport, D. (1957). `Cognitive structures’. In Contemporary approaches to cognition: A symposium held at the University of Colorado (pp. 157–200 ). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rotenstreich, N. (1974). ‘Humboldt’s prolegomena to philosophy of language’. Cultural Hermeneutics, Vol. 2, pp. 211–227.Google Scholar
  75. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1983). `Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem solving’. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 345–395 ). New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  76. Schoenfeld, A.H. (in press-a). `Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance’. Cognitive Science Google Scholar
  77. Schoenfeld, A.H. (in press-b). Mathematical problem solving New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  78. Scriven, M. (1980). `Self-referent research’. Educational Researcher, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 7–11, and Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
  79. Silver, E.A. (1982a). `Knowledge organization and mathematical problem solving’. In F.K. Lester, Jr., and J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 15–25 ). Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  80. Silver, E.A. (1982b). Thinking about problem solving: Toward an understanding of metacognitive aspects of mathematical problem solving. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  81. Simon, H.A. (1977). `What computers mean for man and society’. Science, 195. 1186–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Skemp, R.R. (1979). Intelligence, learning, and action New York: Wiley. Snow, R.E. (1980). `Aptitude processes’. In R.E. Snow, P.A. Federico, andGoogle Scholar
  83. W.E.Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 1. Cognitive process analyses of aptitude (pp. 27–63) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  84. Thomas, R.M. (1984). `Mapping meta-territory’. Educational Researcher, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
  85. Thompson, A.G. (1984). `The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 15, pp. 105–127.Google Scholar
  86. Van Hiele, P.M. and van Hiele-Geldof, D.(1958). `A method of initiation into geometry at secondary schools’. In H. Fruedenthal (Ed.) Report on methods of initiation into geometry (pp. 67–80). Groningen: J.B. Wolters Google Scholar
  87. Vergnaud, G.(1983). `Why is an epistemological perspective necessary for research in mathematics education?’ In J.C. Bergeron and N. Herscovics (Eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1 pp. 2–20). Montréal: Université de Montréal, Faculté de Sciences de l’Education Google Scholar
  88. Von Glasersfeld, E (1983). `Learning as a constructive activity’. In J.C. Bergeron and N. Herscovics (Eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1 pp. 41–69). Montréal: Université de Montréal, Faculté de Sciences de l’Education Google Scholar
  89. Whitehead, A.N. (1929). `The rhythm of education’ The aims of education and other essays. New York: Macmillan Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy Kilpatrick
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GeorgiaUSA

Personalised recommendations