Classification Principles: Metamorphic Facies versus Metamorphic Grade
It was a milestone in the understanding of metamorphic petrology when Eskola (1915) published his concept of metamorphic facies with the intention of replacing the earlier Becke (1913) and Grubenmann (1910) concepts of mnetamorphic depth zones. Nevertheless, this concept of depth zones was elaborated and slightly modified by Grubenmann and Niggli (1924) and remained in use for decades. In the depth zone classification the physical factors of temperature, hydrostatic pressure, and directed pressure (stress) were believed to be strictly correlated in the manner demonstrated in Table 6–1.
KeywordsMetamorphic Rock Mineral Assemblage Depth Zone Greenschist Facies Amphibolite Facies
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Becke, F. 1913. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math. Naturw. Kl. 75: 1–53.Google Scholar
- Eskola, P. 1915. Bull. Comm. Geol. Finlande 44: 109–145. 1920/21.Google Scholar
- Eskola, P. 1915. Norsk, Geol. Tidsskr. 6: 143–194.Google Scholar
- Eskola, P. 1939. In Barth, Correns, and Eskola, Die Entstehung der Gesteine. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Goldschmidt, V. M. 1911. Kristiania Vidensk. Skr. Math. Naturv. Kl. 11. Google Scholar
- Grubenmann, U. 1910. Die kristallinen Schiefer. 2nd edit. Borntraeger, Berlin. andGoogle Scholar
- Niggli, P. 1924. Die Gesteinsmetamorphose I. Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Turner, F. J. 1948. Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir No. 30. Google Scholar
- Turner, F. J. 1968. Metamorphic Petrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
- Turner, F. J. and Verhoogen, J. 1960. Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. 2nd edit., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar