Advertisement

Early Development of the Human Placenta

  • Kurt Benirschke
  • Peter Kaufmann

Abstract

For many years, understanding placental pathology was thought to demand only a limited knowledge of implantation and early placental development, because disturbances of these early steps of placentation seemed to cause abortion rather than affecting placental structure and function. Increasing experience with assisted fertilization, however, has taught us that a high percentage of these cases show impaired fetal and neonatal outcome such as an increased incidence of intrauterine growth retardation and retroplacental hematoma, as well as increased perinatal mortality (Beck & Heywinkel, 1990). The causal connections are still unknown, although the authors give some arguments that placental causes must be considered. It must be speculated that improper conditions during implantation handicap early development and finally result in the inappropriate functioning of the fetoplacental unit.

Keywords

Basal Lamina Human Placenta Apical Plasma Membrane Uterine Epithelium Carnegie Inst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bargmann, W. and Knoop, A.: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Plazentazotten des Menschen. Bemerkungen zum Synzytiumproblem. Z. Zellforsch. 50: 472–493, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, L. and Heywinkel, E.: Berechtigte and unberechtigte Befürchtungen in der Reproduktionsmedizin Gynäkologe 23: 249–251, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Benirschke, K.: In, Fetal homeostasis, Vol. I. R.M. Wynn, ed., p.Google Scholar
  4. 328.
    New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1965. Boyd, J.D. and Hamilton, W.J.: The Human Placenta. HefferGoogle Scholar
  5. Cambridge, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Castellucci, M., Scheper, M., Scheffen, I., Celona, A. and Kaufmann, R: The development of the human placental villous tree. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 181: 117–128, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dallenbach-Hellweg, G. and Sievers, S.: Die histologische Reaktion des Endometrium auf lokal applizierte Gestagene. Virchows Arch. Pathol. Anta. 368: 289–298, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Demir, R., Kaufmann, R, Castellucci, M., Erbengi, T. andGoogle Scholar
  9. Kotowski, A.: Fetal vasculogenesis and angiogenesis inGoogle Scholar
  10. human placental villi. Acta Anat. (Basel) 136:190–203, 1989. Dempsey, E.W.: The development of capillaries in the villi ofGoogle Scholar
  11. early human placentas. Am. J. Anat. 134:221–238,1972. Denker, H.-W.: Implantation: the role of proteinases, and block-Google Scholar
  12. age of implantation by proteinase inhibitors. Adv. Anat.Google Scholar
  13. Embryol. Cell. Biol. 53:3–123,1977. Denker, H.-W.: Embryo implantation and trophoblast invasion. In, Cell Movement and Neoplasia. M. de Brabander, ed., pp. 151–162. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. D enker, H.-W.: Trophoblast-endometrial interactions at embryo implantation: a cell biological paradox. Trophoblast Res. 4:1–27, 1990.Google Scholar
  15. Denker, H.-W. and Aplin, J.D., eds,: Trophoblast invasion and endometrial receptivity: novel aspects of the cell biology of embryo implantation. Trophoblast Res. 4: 1–462, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. Enders, A.C. and King, B.F.: Formation and differentiation of extraembryonic mesoderm in the rhesus monkey. Am. J. Anat. 181: 327–340, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finn, C.A.: The implantation reaction. In, Biology of the Uterus. R.M. Wynn, ed., pp. 245–308. Plenum Press, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Hafez, E.S.E. and Tsutsumi, Y: Changes in endometrial vascularity during implantation and pregnancy in the rabbit. Am. J. Anat. 118: 249–282, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hertig, A.T.: Angiogenesis in the early human chorion and in the primary placenta of the macaque monkey. Contrib. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. 25: 37–81, 1935.Google Scholar
  20. Hertig, A.T.: La nidation des oeufs humains fecondes normaux et anormaux. In, Les Fonctions de Nidation Uterine et Leurs Troubles. J. Ferin and M. Gaudefroy, eds., pp. 169–213, Masson, Paris, 1960.Google Scholar
  21. Hertig, A.T. and Rock, J.: Two human ova of the previllous stage having an ovulation age of about eleven and twelve days respectively. Contrib. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. 29: 127–156, 1941.Google Scholar
  22. Hertig, A.T. and Rock, J.: Two human ova of the pre-villous stage, having a developmental age of about seven and nine days respectively. Contrib. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. 31: 65–84, 1945.Google Scholar
  23. Hertig, A.T. and Rock, J.: Two human ova of the pre-villous stage, having a developmental age of about eight and nine days respectively. Contrib. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. 33: 169–186, 1949.Google Scholar
  24. Heuser, C.H. and Streeter, G.L.: Development of the macaque embryo. Contrib. Embryol. Carnetgie Inst. 29: 15–55, 1941.Google Scholar
  25. Hoos, P.G. and Hoffman, L.H.: Temporal aspects of rabbit uterine vascular and decidual responses to blastocyst stimulation. Biol. Reprod. 23: 453–459, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hustin, J., Schaaps, J.P. and Lambotte, R.: Anatomical studies of the uteroplacental vascularization in the first trimester of pregnancy. Trophoblast Res. 3: 49–60, 1988.Google Scholar
  27. Kaiser, R.: Über die Rückbildungsvorgänge in der Decidua während der Schwangerschaft. Arch. Gynäkol. 192: 209–220, 1960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaufmann, R: Placentation and placenta. In, Humanembryologie. K.V. Hinrichsen, ed., pp. 159–204. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. Kaufmann, P. and Scheffen, I.: Placental development. In, Neonatal and Fetal Medicine—Physiology and Pathophysiology. R. Polin and W. Fox, eds., pp. 47–56. Saunders, Orlando, 1992.Google Scholar
  30. King, B.E: Ultrastructural differentiation of stromal and vascular components in early macaque placental villi. Am. J. Anat. 178: 30–44, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsen, J.F.: Electron microscopy of the implantation site in the rabbit. Am. J. Anat. 109: 319–334, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larsen, J.F.: Electron microscopy of nidation in the rabbit and observations on the human trophoblastic invasion. In, Ovoimplantation. Human Gonadotrophins and Prolactin. P.O. Hubinont, E. Leroy, C. Robyn and P. Leleux, eds., pp., 38–51. S. Karger, Basel, 1970.Google Scholar
  33. Leiser, R. and Beier, H.M.: Morphological studies of lacunar formation in the early rabbit placenta. Trophoblast Res. 3: 97–110, 1988.Google Scholar
  34. Luckett, W.P.: Origin and differentiation of the yolk sac and extraembryonic mesoderm in presomite human and rhesus monkey embryos. Am. J. Anat. 152: 59–97, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mossman, H.W.: Comparative morphogenesis of the fetal membranes and accessory uterine structures. Carnegie Contrib. Embryol. 26: 129–246, 1937.Google Scholar
  36. Mossman, H.W.: Vertebrate Fetal Membranes: Comparative Ontogeny and Morphology; Evolution; Phylogenetic Significance; Basic Functions; Research Opportunities. Macmillan, London, 1987.Google Scholar
  37. Park, W.W.: Choriocarcinoma: A Study of Its Pathology, pp. 13–27. Heinemann, London, 1971.Google Scholar
  38. Pijnenborg, R., Robertson, W.B., Brosens, I. and Dixon, G.: Trophoblast invasion and the establishment of haemochorial placentation in man and laboratory animals. Placenta 2: 71–92, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Psychoyos, A.: The “implantation window”: can it be enlarged or displaced? Excerpta Med. Int. Congr. Ser. 768: 231–232, 1988.Google Scholar
  40. Robertson, W.B. and Warner, B.: The ultrastructure of the human placental bed. J. Pathol. 112: 203–211, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schaaps, J.P. and Hustin, J.: In vivo aspect of the maternal-trophoblastic border during the first trimester of gestation. Trophoblast Res. 3: 3–48, 1988.Google Scholar
  42. Schlafke, S. and Enders, A.C.: Cellular basis of interaction between trophoblast and uterus in implantation. Biol. Reprod. 12: 41–65, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steven, D.H.: Interspecies differences in the structure and function of trophoblast. In, Biology of Trophoblast. Y.W. Loke and A. Whyte, eds., pp. 111–136. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983.Google Scholar
  44. Tedde, G., Tedde-Piras, A. and Berta, R.: A new structural pattern of the human trophoblast: the syncytial units. In, Abstracts of the 11th Rochester Trophoblast conference, abstract 117, 1988a.Google Scholar
  45. Tedde, G., Tedde-Piras, A. and Fenu, G.: Demonstration of an intercellular pathway of transport in the human trophoblast. In, Abstracts of the 11th Rochester Trophoblast Conference, abstract. 77, 1988b.Google Scholar
  46. Welsh, A.O. and Enders, A.E.: Light and electron microscopic examination of the mature decidual cells of the rat with emphasis on the antimesometrial decidua and its degeneration. Am. J. Anat. 172: 1–29, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wislocki, G.B. and Streeter, G.L.: On the placentation of the macaque (Macaca mulatta) from the time of implantation until the formation of the definitive placenta. Contrib. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. 27: 1–66, 1938.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Benirschke
    • 1
  • Peter Kaufmann
    • 2
  1. 1.University Medical CenterUniversity of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Institut für Anatomie der Medizinischen FakultätRheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations