Advertisement

Examination

  • Kurt Benirschke
  • Peter Kaufmann

Abstract

Most placentas are normal, as are most babies. Therefore an examination of all placentas is not warranted. On the other hand, because placentas differ widely in shape, size, and appearance, the novice must become familiar with this spectrum of placental shapes. To do it, a large number of placentas must be examined routinely. It is therefore prudent in hospitals with large numbers of deliveries to select placentas for examination. To facilitate this practice, storage is required.

Keywords

Umbilical Cord Placental Tissue Normal Placenta Single Umbilical Artery Monochorionic Twin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altshuler, G., and Hyde, S.: Fusobacteria: an important cause of chorioamnionitis. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 109:739–743, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacsich, P., and Smout, C.F.V.: Some observations on the foetal vessels of the human placenta with an account of the corrosion technique. J. Anat. 72:358–364, 1938.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomew, R.A., Colvin, E.D., Grimes, W.H., Fish, J.S., Lester, W.M., and Galloway, W.H.: Criteria by which toxemia of pregnancy may be diagnosed from unlabeled formalin-fixed placentas. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 82:277–290, 1961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, V., and Bleyl, U.: Placentarzotte bei Schwanger-schaftstoxicose und fetaler Erythroblastose im fluorescenzmikroskopischen Bilde. Virchows Arch. (Pathol. Anat.) 334:516–527, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bejar, R., Wozniak, P., Allard, M., Benirschke, K., Vaucher, Y., Coen, R., Berry, C., Schragg, P., Villegas, I., and Resnik, R.: Antenatal origin of neurologic damage in newborn infants. I. Preterm Infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 159:357–363, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. Benirschke, K.: Examination of the placenta. Obstet. Gynecol. 18:309–333, 1961a.Google Scholar
  7. Benirschke, K.: Twin placenta and perinatal mortality. New York State J. Med. 61:1499–1508, 1961b.Google Scholar
  8. Boe, F.: Studies on vascularization of the human placenta. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. (Suppl. 5) 32: 1–92, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford, J.M.: Vascular anatomy of the human placenta. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 84:1543–1567, 1962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Driscoll, S.G.: Choriocarcinoma: An “incidental finding” within a term placenta. Obstet. Gynecol. 21: 96–101, 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, C.C., Garrett, W., and Kossoff, G.: Placental aging monitored by gray scale echography. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 124:483–488, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox, H.: Pathology of the Placenta. Saunders, London, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. Fritschek, F.: Über “leere” Placentarhohlräume. Anat. Anz. 64:65–73, 1927.Google Scholar
  14. Fujikura, T.: Placental calcification and maternal age. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 87:41–45, 1963a.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujikura, T.: Placental calcification and seasonal difference. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 87:46–47, 1963b.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Geller, H.F.: Über die Bedeutung des subchorialen Fibrinstreifens in der menschlichen Placenta. Arch. Gynäkol. 192:1–6, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleich, G.J.: Personal communication, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. Gruenwald, P.: Examination of the placenta by the pathologist. Arch. Pathol. 77:41–46, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gruenwald, P., and Minh, H.N.: Evaluation of body and organ weights in perinatal pathology. II. Weight of body and placenta of surviving and of autopsied infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 82:312–319, 1961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Heifetz, S.A.: Single umbilical artery. A statistical analysis of 237 autopsy cases and review of the literature. Perspect. Pediatr. Pathol. 8:345–378, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hyrtl, J.: Die Blutgefässe der Menschlichen Nachgeburt Unter Normalen und Abnormen Verhältnissen. Braumüller, Vienna, 1870.Google Scholar
  22. Jeacock, M.K., Scott, J., and Plester, J.A.: Calcium content of the human placenta. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 87:34–40, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiricka, Z., and Preslickova, M.: The effect of fixation on staining of placental tissue. Z. Versuchstierk. 16: 127–130, 1974.Google Scholar
  24. Lucas, A., Christofides, N.D., Adran, T.E., Bloom, S.R., and Aynsley-Green, A.: Fetal distress, meconium, and motilin. Lancet i:718, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, P.W., Coen, R.W., and Benirschke, K.: Dating the time interval from meconium passage to birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 66:459–462, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moessinger, A.C., Blanc, W.A., Marone, P.A., and Pol-sen, D.C.: Umbilical cord length as an index of fetal activity: Experimental study and clinical implications. Pediatr. Res. 16:109–112, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naeye, R.L.: Maternal floor infarction. Hum. Pathol. 16:823–828, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naeye, R.L.: Functionally important disorders of the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal membranes. Hum. Pathol. 18:680–691, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Panigel, M.: Placental perfusion experiments. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 84:1664–1683, 1962.Google Scholar
  30. Priman, J.: A note on the anastomosis of the umbilical arteries. Anat. Rec. 134:1–5, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pritchard, J.A., MacDonald, P.C., and Gant, N.F.: Williams Obstetrics, 17th ed. Appleton Century Crofts, Norwalk, CN, 1985.Google Scholar
  32. Reece, E.A., Scioscia, A.L., Pinter, E., Hobbins, J.C., Green, J., Mahoney, M.J., and Naftolin, F.: Prognostic significance of the human yolk sac assessed by ultrasonography. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 159:1191–1194, 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schatz, F.: Die Gefassverbindungen der Placentakreis-läufe eineiiger Zwillinge, ihre Entwicklung und ihre Folgen. Arch. Gynäkol. 27:1–72, 1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schremmer, B.-N.: Gewichtsveränderungen verschiedener Gewebe nach Formalinfixierung. Frankfurt Z. Pathol. 77:299–304, 1967.Google Scholar
  35. Snoeck, J.: Le Placenta Humain. Masson & Cie, Paris. 1958.Google Scholar
  36. Torpin, R., and Hart, B.F.: Placenta bilobata. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 42:38–49, 1941.Google Scholar
  37. Walker, J.: Weight of the human fetus and of its placenta. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 19:39–40, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeek, P.M., and Assali, N.S.: Vascular changes in the decidua associated with eclamptogenic toxemia of pregnancy. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 20:1099–1109, 1950.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Benirschke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Kaufmann
    • 3
  1. 1.Pathology and Reproductive MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.University Medical CenterSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Institut für Anatomie der Medizinischen Fakultät, Rheinisch-Westfälische TechnischeHochschule AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations