Advertisement

Common Bile Duct Exploration

  • Jameson L. Chassin

Abstract

As pointed out by Way, Admirand, and Dunphy, the true incidence of CBD stones in patients undergoing surgery for gallstones is probably between 12% and 15% in the United States. By using indications essentially identical to those stated below and by performing routine preexploratory cystic duct cholangiography, Way performed CBD explorations in only 21% of 952 cholecystectomies. These explorations were positive for calculi in 65% of the patients explored. Of the 952 cholecystectomy cases, 14% had CBD stones. In 6 additional reports collected by Way in which routine cystic duct cholangiography was employed, the results were similar. On the other hand, the same author cited 3 other reports from the Lahey Clinic of cases in which preexploratory cholangiography was not performed. Here, of 33% of patients undergoing CBD exploration only 30% of the ducts contained stones. Whereas the use of routine cystic duct cholangiograms resulted in the recovery of CBD stones in over 14% of the cholecystectomies reported by Way and colleagues, the authors who omitted preexploratory cholangiography were able to discover CBD stones in only 10% of their cholecystectomy cases. In other words, routine preexploratory cholangiography markedly reduces the number of CBD explorations performed yet achieves a higher recovery rate of CBD stones (see Table 50-1).

Keywords

Bile Duct Cystic Duct Hepatic Duct Bile Duct Stone Residual Stone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen B, Shapiro H, Way LW (1981) Management of recurrent and residual common duct stones. Am J Surg 142: 41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berci G, Shore JM, Morgenstern L, Hamlin JA (1978) Choledochoscopy and operative flourocholangiography in the prevention of retained bile duct stones. World J Surg 2: 411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burhenne HJ (1976) Complications of nonoperative extraction of retained common duct stones. Am J Surg 131: 260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jones SA (1978) The prevention and treatment of recurrent bile duct stones by transduodenal sphincteroplasty. World J Surg 2: 473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Madden JL (1978) Primary common bile duct stones. World J Surg 2: 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nora PF, Berci G, Dorazzio RA, Kirschenbaum G, et al. (1977) Operative choledochoscopy. Am J Surg 44: 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rutledge RH (1976) Sphincteroplasty and choledochoduodenostomy for benign biliary obstructions. Ann Surg 183: 476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Saharia PC, Zuidema GD, Cameron JL (1977) Primary common duct stones. Ann Surg 185: 598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Thomas CG Jr, Nicholson CP, Owen J (1971) Effectiveness of choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincteroplasty in the treatment of benign obstruction of the common duct. Ann Surg 173: 845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Way LW, Admirand WH, Dunphy JE (1972) Management of choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 176: 347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. White TT, Harrison RC (1973) Reoperative gastrointestinal surgery. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jameson L. Chassin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.New York University School of MedicineUSA
  2. 2.Booth Memorial Medical CenterFlushingUSA
  3. 3.University Hospital, New York University Medical CenterUSA
  4. 4.New York Veterans Administration HospitalUSA
  5. 5.Bellevue HospitalUSA

Personalised recommendations