Moral Functioning in School
To contribute to society, most individuals move beyond an exclusive preoccupation with moral conduct and character to consider how institutional practices facilitate or undermine moral functioning. Schools can contribute to this development by helping young people expand their knowledge of personalities and by fostering a greater awareness of how societal institutions influence thoughts, feelings, and actions. In schools, students are able to interact with people whose families differ from their own, and they are exposed to new group norms and institutional practices. Schools are primarily responsible for helping young people learn to read, write, and compute, but many educators also intentionally accept responsibility for nurturing wisdom and fairness (e.g., Battistich, Solomon, Kim, Watson, & Schaps, 1995).
KeywordsYoung People Procedural Justice Corrective Justice Internal Norm Moral Disengagement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aronfreed, J. (1968). Conduct and conscience: The socialization of internalized control over behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 627–658.Google Scholar
- Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Nicholls, J. G., & Thorkildsen, T. A. (1989). Intellectual conventions verses matters of substance: Elementary school students as curriculum theorists. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 533–544.Google Scholar
- Peebles, M. (1995). Social alienation in the junior high school: Five case studies. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56–06, A2194.Google Scholar
- Thorkildsen, T. A. (2000). Children’s coordination of procedural and commutative justice in school. In W. van Haaften, T. Wren, & A. Tellings (Eds.), Moral sensibilities and education II: The schoolchild (pp. 61–88 ). Bemmel, The Netherlands: Concorde Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Thorkildsen, T. A., & Jordan, C. (1995). Is there a right way to collaborate? When the experts speak can the customers be right? In J. G. Nicholls & T. A. Thorkildsen (Eds.), Reasons for learning: Expanding the conversation on student-teacher collaboration (pp. 137–161 ). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Thorkildsen, T. A., & Nicholls, J. G. (with Bates, A., Brankis, N., & DeBolt, T.). (2002). Motivation and the struggle to learn: Responding to fractured experience. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Thorkildsen, T. A., Sodonis, A., & White-McNulty, L. (2004). Epistemology and adolescents’ conceptions of procedural justice in school. Journal of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
- Thorkildsen, T. A., & Weaver, A. (2003). Developing conceptions of the role of school in society: Prioritizing learning, test, and contest situations. Presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
- Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In N. Eisenberg & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development ( 5th ed., pp. 863–932 ). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar