The Multi-Stage Gibbs Sampler
After two chapters of preparation on the slice and two-stage Gibbs samplers, respectively, we are now ready to envision the entire picture for the Gibbs sampler. We describe the general method in Section 10.1, whose theoretical properties are less complete than for the two-stage special case (see Section 10.2): The defining difference between that sampler and the multi-stage version considered here is that the interleaving structure of the two-stage chain does not carry over. Some of the consequences of interleaving are the fact that the individual subchains are also Markov chains, and the Duality Principle and Rao-Blackwellization hold in some generality. None of that is true here, in the multi-stage case. Nevertheless, the multi-stage Gibbs sampler enjoys many optimality properties, and still might be considered the workhorse of the MCMC world. The remainder of this chapter deals with implementation considerations, many in connection with the important role of the Gibbs sampler in Bayesian Statistics.
KeywordsCovariance Acidity Arena Mastitis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Broniatowski, M., Celeux, G., and Diebolt, J. (1984). Reconnaissance de mélanges de densités par un algorithme d’apprentissage probabiliste. In Diday, E., editor, Data Analysis and Informatics, volume 3, pages 359–373. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., and Gilks, W. (1995a). BUGS: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling. Technical report, Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge Univ.Google Scholar
- Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., and Gilks, W. (1995b). BUGS examples. Technical report, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Univ.Google Scholar
- Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., and Gilks, W. (1995c). BUGS examples. Technical report, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Univ.Google Scholar
- Dette, H. and Studden, W. (1997). The Theory of Canonical Moments with Applications in Statistics, Probability and Analysis. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Lauritzen, S. (1996). Graphical Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Dellaportas, P. and Forster, J. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo model determination for hierarchical and graphical log-linear models. Technical report, Univ. of Southampton.Google Scholar