The Littoral Zone

  • Robert G. Wetzel
  • Gene E. Likens


The littoral zone represents an interface between the land of the drainage basin and the open water of the lake; reservoir, or stream (Wetzel, 1990). The extent of the development of the littoral zone is highly variable and depends on both the geomorphology of the basin and the rate of sedimentation that has occurred since its formation.


Open Water Aquatic Plant Littoral Zone Aquatic Macrophyte Artificial Substratum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, H.L. 1971. Primary productivity, chemo-organotrophy, and nutritional interactions of epiphytic algae and bacteria on macrophytes in the littoral of a lake. Ecol. Monogr. 41:97-127.Google Scholar
  2. Brakke, D.F. 1976. Modification of the Whiteside-Williams pattern sampler. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 33: 2861–2863.Google Scholar
  3. Burkholder, J.A. and R.G. Wetzel. 1989. Epiphytic microalgae on a natural substratum in a hardwater lake: Seasonal dynamics of community structure, biomass and ATP content. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 83: 1–56.Google Scholar
  4. Correll, D.S. and H.B. Correll. 1972. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southwestern United States. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Wat. Poll. Control Res. Series, 16030 DNL 01/72. Washington, D.C. 1777 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Dickerman, J.A. and R.G. Wetzel. 1985. Clonal growth in Typha latifolia: Population dynamics and demography of the ramets. J. Ecol. 73:535–552.Google Scholar
  6. Dickerman, J.A., A.J. Stewart, and R.G. Wetzel. 1986. Estimates of net annual aboveground production: Sensitivity to sampling frequency. Ecology 67: 650–659.Google Scholar
  7. Downing, J.A. 1984. Sampling the benthos of standing waters. pp. 87–130. In: J.A. Downing and F.H. Rigler, Editors. A Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters. 2nd Ed. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Fassett, N.C. 1957. A Manual of Aquatic Plants. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison. 405 pp. Godfrey, R.K. and J.W. Wooten. 1979. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States. Monocotyledons. Univ. Georgia Press, Athens. 712 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Godfrey, R.K. and J.W. Wooten. 1981. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States. Dicotyledons. Univ. Georgia Press, Athens. 933 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Goulden, C.E. 1971. Environmental control of the abundance and distribution of the chydorid Cladocera. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 320–331.Google Scholar
  11. Kajak, Z. 1971. Benthos of standing water. pp. 25–65. In: W.T. Edmondson and G.G. Winberg, Editors. A Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No. 17. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Keen, R. 1973. A probabilistic approach to the dynamics of natural populations of the Chydoridae ( Cladocera, Crustacea). Ecology 54: 524–534.Google Scholar
  13. Mathews, C.P. and D.F. Westlake. 1969. Estimation of production by populations of higher plants subject to high mortality. Oikos 20:156–160.Google Scholar
  14. Mason, H.L. 1957. A Flora of the Marshes of California. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 878 pp. Muenscher, W.C. 1944. Aquatic Plants of the United States. Comstock, Ithaca, NY. 374 pp. Pennak, R.W. 1962. Quantitative zooplankton sampling in littoral vegetation areas. Limnol. Oceanogr. 7:487–489.Google Scholar
  15. Prescott, G.W. 1969. How to Know the Aquatic Plants. Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA. 171 pp. Slâdeckovd, A. 1962. Limnological investigation methods for the periphyton (“Aufwuchs”) community. Bot. Rev. 28: 286–350.Google Scholar
  16. Szlauer, L. 1963. Diurnal migrations of minute invertebrates inhabiting the zone of submerged hydrophytes in a lake. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 25:56–64.Google Scholar
  17. Westlake, D.F. 1965. Some basic data for investigations of the productivity of aquatic macrophytes. Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 18 (Suppl.): 229–248.Google Scholar
  18. Wetzel, R.G. 1964. A comparative study of the primary productivity of higher aquatic plants, periphyton, and phytoplankton in a large, shallow lake. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 49:1–64.Google Scholar
  19. Wetzel, R.G. 1979. The role of the littoral zone and detritus in lake metabolism. pp. 145–161. In: G.E. Likens, W. Rodhe, and C. Serruya, Editors. Symposium on Lake Metabolism and Lake Management. Ergebnisse Limnol., Arch. Hydrobiol. 13: 145–161.Google Scholar
  20. Wetzel, R.G. 1983a. Limnology. 2nd Ed. Saunders Coll., Philadelphia. 860 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Wetzel, R.G. 1983b. Attached algal-substrata interactions: Fact or myth? pp. 207–215. In: R.G.Google Scholar
  22. Wetzel, Editor. Periphyton of Freshwater Ecosystems. Developments in Hydrobiology 17. Wetzel, R.G. 1990. Land-water interfaces: Metabolic and limnological regulators. Baldi Memorial Lecture. Verh. Int. Int. Ver. Limnol. 25: 6–24.Google Scholar
  23. Wetzel, R.G. and D.F. Westlake. 1971. Periphyton. pp. 42–50. In: R.A. Vollenweider, Editor. A Manual on Methods for Measuring Primary Production in Aquatic Environments. IBP Handbook No. 12. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Whiteside, M.C. 1974. Chydorid (Cladocera) ecology: Seasonal patterns and abundance of populations in Elk Lake, Minnesota. Ecology 55: 538–550.Google Scholar
  25. Whiteside, M.C. and J.B. Williams. 1975. A new sampling technique for aquatic ecologists. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 19: 1534–1539.Google Scholar
  26. Whittaker, R.H. and G.E. Likens. 1975. The biosphere and man. pp. 305–328. In: H. Lieth and R.H. Whittaker, Editors. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Wetzel
    • 1
  • Gene E. Likens
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Ecosystem StudiesThe New York Botanical Garden, Cary ArboretumMillbrookUSA

Personalised recommendations