Some Major Contributions of Landscape Ecology: Examples of Tools, Methods, and Applications

  • Zev Naveh
  • Arthur S. Lieberman
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)


Recent decades have been witness to highly productive activities in the evolving fields of land-use capability analysis, regional landscape evaluation, ecologically based land-use planning and design, ecological management, and landscape reclamation. Major new capabilities and approaches have been developed that make possible intensive utilization of ecological insights and principles in addressing, in an integrative way, the relationship of human communities with their environment in the landscape of particular areas. The activities of leaders in several disciplines are discernible in this period of rapid evolution (Cocks and Austin, 1978; Steinitz et al., 1977; Vester, 1980; Whittaker, 1975; Walter, 1979; Whyte, 1976; Zonneveld, 1979; McHarg, 1969; Hills, 1976). Strides in developing methods and procedures that reflect a holistic viewpoint are evident in their work and writings. The interdisciplinary human ecosystem science of landscape ecology has increasingly contributed to research into, and planning and management of, our environment.


Remote Sensing Landscape Ecology Aerial Photography Physical Planning Land System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrios, G. N. 1969. Plant Pathology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, L., et al. 1974. Remote Sensing Environmental and Geotechnical Applications. The State of the Art. Engineering Bulletin 45. Dames and Moore, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  3. Allan, J. A. 1980. Remote sensing in land and land use studies. Geography, Vol. 65, Part I, No. 286, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R. 1971. Land use classification schemes used in selected recent geographic applications of remote sensing. Photogrammetric Engineering 37 (4): 379–387.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. R., et al. 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Austin, M. P., and J. J. Basinski. 1978. Bio-physical survey techniques. In: Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales, Vol. 1, J. J. Basinski (Ed.), General Report. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra.Google Scholar
  7. Austin, M. P., and K. D. Cocks (Series Eds.). 1978. Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales. A Study in Methods of Acquiring and Using Information to Analyze Regional Land Use Options, 4 vols. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Avery, T. E. 1970. Photo Interpretation for Land Managers. Eastman Kodak Co. Publication M-76. Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Avery, T. E. 1977. Interpretation of Aerial Photographs. Burgess, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  10. Bachfischer, R., J. David, H. Kiemstedt, and G. Aulig. 1977. The ecological risk-analysis as tool for regional planning and decisions in the industrial region Middle Franconia. Landschaft + Stadt, 9: 145–161 (German with English summary).Google Scholar
  11. Bajzak, D. 1973. Bio-physical land classification of the Lake Tahoe Basin, California-Nevada. A Guide to Planning. U.S. Forest Service, South Lake Tahoe, California.Google Scholar
  12. Basinski, J. J. (Ed.). 1978. General Report (Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales, Vol. 1 ). Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra.Google Scholar
  13. Bauer, H. J. 1973. Ecological aerial photo interpretation for revegetation in the Cologne lignite district. In: Ecology and Reclamation of Devastated Land. Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Baulkwill, W. J. 1972. The land resources division of the Overseas Development Administration. Tropical Sci. 14: 305–322.Google Scholar
  15. Bechmann, A. 1978. Nutzwertanalyse, Bewertungstheorie und Plannung. Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern und Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  16. Belcher, D. J., et al. 1967. Potential Benefits to Be Derived from Applications of Remote Sensing of Agricultural, Forest and Range Resources. Center for Aerial Photographic Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Belknap, R. K., and J. G. Furtado. 1967. Three Approaches to Environmental Resource Analysis. Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Berry, L., and R. B. Ford. 1977. Recommendations for a System to Monitor Critical Indicators in Areas Prone to Desertification. Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Buchanan, C., et al. 1976. Midden Randstad Study. Part II. Final Report. Adviersbureau Arnhem B.V., Gronmij N. V.Google Scholar
  20. Bulfin, R. L., and H. L. Weaver. 1977. Appropriate Technology for Natural Resources Development: An Overview. Annotated Bibliography, and a Guide to Sources of Information. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  21. California Council on Intergovernmental Relations. 1973. General Plan Guidelines. State of California Governor’s Office, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  22. Calkins, H. W., and R. F. Tomlinson. 1977. Geographic Information Systems, Methods and Equipment for Land Use Planning. 1977. Performed by International Geographic Union Commission on Geographical Data Sensing and Processing, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  23. Carpenter, R. A. (Ed.). 1981. Assessing Tropical Forest Lands: Their Suitability for Sustainable Uses. Proceedings of the Conference on Forest Land Assessment and Management for Sustainable Uses, June 19–28, 1979, Honolulu, Hawaii. Tycooly International Publishing Ltd., Dublin.Google Scholar
  24. Chambers, A. 1979. Toward a synthesis of mountains, people, and institutions. Landscape Planning 6: 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Christian, C. S. 1963. The use and abuse of land and water. In: The Population Crisis and the Use of World Resources, Vol. 2. World Academy of Art and Science. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar
  26. Christian, C. S., and G. A. Stewart. 1947. North Australia Regional Survey, 1946. Katherine-Darwin Region. General report on land classification and development of land industries. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Christian, C. S., and G. A. Stewart. 1953. General Report on Survey of Katherine-Darwin Region, 1946. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australian Land Research Series no. 1.Google Scholar
  28. Christian, C. S., and G. A. Stewart. 1968. Methodology of integrated surveys. Aerial Surveys and Integrated Studies: Proc. Toulouse Conf., UNESCO, Paris, pp. 233–280.Google Scholar
  29. Cocks, K. D., and M. P. Austin. 1978. The land use problem and approaches to its solution. In: Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales, Vol. 1, J. J. Basinski (Ed.), General Report. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra.Google Scholar
  30. Division of Land Use Research. 1978. Research Report 1973–77. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra.Google Scholar
  31. Dorney, R. S., and D. W. Hoffman. 1979. Development of landscape planning concepts and management strategies for an urbanizing agricultural region. Landscape Planning 6: 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eckaus, R. S. 1977. Appropriate Technologies for Developing Countries. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  33. Elachi, C. 1982. Radar images of the earth from space. Sci. Am. 247 (6): 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Elsner, G. H., and R. C. Smardon (Technical Coordinators). 1979. Proceedings of Our National Landscape, A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource. April 23–25, 1979, Incline Village, Nevada.Google Scholar
  35. Erickson, P. A. 1979. Environmental Impact: Principles and Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Etzioni, A. 1968. The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  37. Fabos, J. G. 1978. Planning and landscape evaluation. Keynote address to NewGoogle Scholar
  38. Zealand Planning Institute Conference on Planning and Landscape, Dunedin. Fabos, J. G. 1979. Planning the Total Landscape: A Guide to Intelligent Land Use. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  39. Fleming, P. M., and J. Stokes (Eds.). 1978. Land Function Studies. (Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales, Vol. 4 ). Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra.Google Scholar
  40. Food and Agriculture Organization. 1974. Remote Sensing and Its Use in Agriculture and Forestry. Leaflet. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  41. Godby, E. A., and J. Otterman (Eds.). 1978. The Contribution of Space Observations to Global Food Information Systems. Proceedings of the Twentieth Plenary Meeting of COSPAR, Tel Aviv, Israel, 7–18 June 1977. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Gunn, R. H. (Ed.). 1978. Bio-physical Background Studies (Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales, Vol. 2 ). Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra.Google Scholar
  43. Grey, A. L., et al. 1973. Applications of remote sensing in urban and regional planning. Proc. Symp. Remote Sensing, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, October 29-November 1, 1973. American Society of Photogrammetry, pp. 115–116.Google Scholar
  44. Hammerschlag, R. S., and W. J. Sopstyle. 1975. Investigations of remote sensing techniques for early detection of Dutch elm disease. Proc. 4th Ann. Remote Sensing of Earth Resources Conf., Tullahoma, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  45. Hanson, H. C. 1962. Dictionary of Ecology. Philosophical Library, New York. Hardy, E. E. 1970. Inventorying New York’s land use and natural resources. Food and Life Sciences Quarterly 3(41: 4–7.Google Scholar
  46. Hardy, E. E. 1979. The design of natural resource inventories. Resource Information Laboratory, New York State Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Hills, G. A. 1961. The Ecological Basis of Land Use Planning. Research Report 46, Ontario Department of Lands and Forests, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  48. Hills, G. A. 1976. An integrated interpretive holistic approach to ecosystem classification. In: Ecological (Biophysical) Land Classification in Canada. pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
  49. Hills, G. A., D. V. Love, and D. G. Lacate. 1970. Developing a Better Environment. Ecological Land-use Planning in Ontario—A Study of Methodology in the Development of Regional Plans. Ontario Economic Council, Toronto.Google Scholar
  50. Holdridge, L. R. 1947. Determination of world plant formations from sample climatic data. Science 105 (2727): 367–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Holdridge, L. R. 1967. Life Zone Ecology. Tropical Science Centre, San Jose, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  52. Jacobs, P. 1979a. Landscape planning in Canada. Landscape Planning 6:95–100. Jacobs, P. 1979b. George Angus Hills: A Canadian tribute. Landscape Planning 6: 101–107.Google Scholar
  53. Jacobs, S. W. 1979. A Catalog for the Environment. Wayne County: The Aesthetic Heritage of a Rural Area. Wayne County New York Historical Society.Google Scholar
  54. Johannsen, C. J., and J. L. Sanders. 1982. Remote Sensing and Resource Management. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, Iowa.Google Scholar
  55. Kaplan, G. A. 1981. Identification of impacts on development of recreation and tourism on coastal resources. Habiospherah 9–10: 24–31 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  56. Kiemstedt, H. A. 1975. Landschaftsbewertung fur die Erhohlung im Sauerland. Dortmund.Google Scholar
  57. Kuchler, A. W. 1967. Vegetation Mapping. Ronald Press Co., New York.Google Scholar
  58. Lacate, D. S. 1969. Guidelines for Biophysical Land Classification. CanadianGoogle Scholar
  59. Forestry Service Publication No. 1264. Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  60. Landgrebe, D. 1972. Systems approach to the use of remote sensing. In: International Workshop on Earth Resources Survey Systems, Vol. 1. NASA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  61. Lands Directorate. Canada Land Inventory. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  62. Lands Directorate. Canada Land Data System. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  63. Lewis, P. 1967. Regional Design for Human Impact. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Northeast Region, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  64. Lieberman, A. S. 1978. The Need, Potential and Feasibility for Utilization of Remote Sensing in Land Use Planning and Natural Resources Management in Israel. A report to the Director of the Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
  65. Lillesand, T. M., et al. 1978. Quantification of Urban Tree Stress through Microdensitometric Analysis of Aerial Photography. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York.Google Scholar
  66. Lillesand, T. M., and R. W. Kiefer. 1979. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  67. Lund, H. G., and E. McNutt. 1979. Integrating Inventories, An Annotated Bibliography. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  68. Marble, D. F. (Ed.). Computer Software for Spatial Data Handling, Vol. 1: Full Geographic Information Systems. Prepared by the International Geographic Union, Commission on Geographical Data Sensing and Processing, Ottawa, Ontario, for the U.S. Department of the Interior Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  69. Marsh, W. L. 1964. Landscape Vocabulary. Miramar, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  70. McCauley, J. F., et al. 1982. Subsurface valleys and geoarchaeology of the eastern Sahara revealed by shuttle radar. Science 218 (4576): 1004–1019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McHarg, I. L. 1969. Design with Nature. Natural History Press, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Ministry of Housing and Physical Planning. 1977. Summary General Ecological Model. Study report 5. 3. B. National Physical Planning Agency, The Hague.Google Scholar
  73. Ministry of Housing and Physical Planning. Summary of The Netherlands Environmental Survey. Study report 5.3.A. National Physical Planning Agency, The Hague.Google Scholar
  74. National Academy of Sciences. 1977. Resource Sensing from Space: Prospects for Developing Countries. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  75. Naveh, Z. 1966. The development of Tanzania Masailand—a sociological and ecological challenge. African Soils 10, 1 /3: 449–539.Google Scholar
  76. Nelson, D. 1975. Land systems, some basic concepts. U.S. Forest Service, Region 9, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 16 p.Google Scholar
  77. Nir, Y. 1976. Shovrei-galim M’nutakim, Dorbanot, V’gufim M’lachutiyim Aherim Behof Ha-yam Hatichon, Vehashpaatam al Mivneh Hehof Shel Israel (Detached breakwaters, groins and other artificial bodies on the Mediterranean coast, and their impact on the structure of the coast of Israel). Hebrew Report No. Gimel-Yud/2/76. Department of Marine Geology, Geological Survey of Israel, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  78. Noi-Meir, I., and N. G. Seligman. 1979. Management of semi-arid ecosystems in Israel. In: B. H. Walker (Ed.), Management of Semi-Arid Ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
  79. O’Riordan, T., and Hey, R. D. 1977. Environmental Impact Assessment. Saxon House, Lexington Books, Lexington, Maine.Google Scholar
  80. Otterman, J., et al. 1975. Western Negev and Sinai ecosystems: Comparative study of vegetation, albedo, and temperatures. Agro-ecosystems 2: 47–60.Google Scholar
  81. Otterman, J., et al. 1978. Rangeland recovery in an exclosure: Satellite and ground observations. In: The Contribution of Space Observations to Global Food Information Systems, Vol. 2. Advances in Space Exploration, COSPAR Symposium Series. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  82. Paul, C. K. 1978. Internationalization of remote sensing technology. In: Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 44 (5): 625–632.Google Scholar
  83. Qureshi, A. H., et al. 1980. Assessing Tropical Forest Lands: Their Suitability for Sustainable Uses. A Report on the Conference on Forest Land Assessment and Management for Sustainable Uses, June 19–28, 1979, Honolulu, Hawaii. East-West Environment and Policy Institute, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  84. Rau, J. G., and Wooten, D. C. 1980. Environmental Impact Analysis Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  85. Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  86. Schechter, M., R. Enis, B. Reiser, and Y. Tzamir. 1981. Evaluation of landscape resources for recreation planning. Regional Studies 15: 323–392.Google Scholar
  87. Schwarz, C. F., et al. 1976. Wildland Planning Glossary. USDA FS Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-13/1976. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  88. Senykoff, R. S. 1978. Transferring Satellite Remote Sensing to Kenya: Application of Appropriate Technology to Spatial Characteristics of Population. Ph.D. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  89. Steinitz, C., et al. 1977. Managing Suburban Growth: A Modeling Approach/ Summary. Landscape Architecture Research Office, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  90. Trowbridge, P. J. 1979. Ecologically-based regional planning methods. Lecture notes for landscape architecture class, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  91. United Nations. 1978a. Desertification: Its Causes and Consequences. Pergamon Press, New York, p. 10.Google Scholar
  92. United Nations. 1978b. United Nations Conference on Desertification. 29 August-9 September 1977. Round-up, plan of action and resolutions. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  93. U.S. Agency for International Development. 1980. Remote Sensing: A Technology for Economic Development. U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  94. U.S. Army Engineer Division, North Central. 1970. Upper Mississippi River. Comprehensive Basin Study. UMRCBS Coordinating Committee.Google Scholar
  95. U.S. Forest Service. 1972. Planning and Programming Glossary. Unpublished manuscript. Planning Glossary Task Force, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  96. Van Genderen, J. L., et al. 1978. Guidelines for using Landsat data for rural land use surveys in developing countries. Invited paper, ITC International Symposium 1976. ITC Journal 1978 (1): 30–45.Google Scholar
  97. Verstappen, H. T. 1966. The use of aerial photographs in delta studies. In: Scientific Problems of the Humid Tropical Zone Deltas and Their Implications. Proceedings of the Dacca Symposium. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  98. Verstappen, H. T. 1969. Aerial survey and rural development in South Asia. In: Problems of Land Use in South Asia. U. Schweinfurth and M. Domrös (Eds.), Yearbook of South Asia Institute. Heidelberg University, Otto Harrassowitz, Weisbaden.Google Scholar
  99. Vester, F., and A. von Hesler. 1980. Sensitivitätsmodell. Regionale Planungsgemeinschaft Untermain, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  100. Walker, P. A., and J. F. Angus (Eds.). 1978. Socio-economic Background Studies (Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales, Vol. 3 ). Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra.Google Scholar
  101. Walter, H. 1979. Vegetation of the Earth and Ecological Systems of the Geobiosphere, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Watkins, T. 1978. The economics of remote sensing. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 44 (9): 1167–1172.Google Scholar
  103. Webster] 1963. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language. Unabridged. G and C Merriam Co., Springfield, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  104. Wells, R. E., and B. A. Roberts. 1973. Bio-physical Survey of the Badger-Diversion Lake Area, Newfoundland. Canada Forestry Service, Newfoundland Forest Research Center, St. Johns, Newfoundland, Canada.Google Scholar
  105. Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd edition. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  106. Whyte, R. 0. 1976. Land and Land Appraisal. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  107. Wilford, J. N. 1982. Spacecraft detects Sahara’s buried past. New York Times, November 26, 1982.Google Scholar
  108. Zangemeister, C. 1971. Nutzwertanalyse in der Systemtechnik. München. Zonneveld, I. 1979. Land evaluation and land(scape) science. In: Use of AerialGoogle Scholar
  109. Photographs in Geography and Geomorphology. ITC Textbook of Photointerpretation. Vol. VII. ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  110. Zonneveld, I. S. 1978. A critical review of survey methods for range management in the third world with special emphasis on remote sensing. Proc. First International Rangeland Congress, Denver, Colorado, pp. 510–513.Google Scholar
  111. Zumer-Linder, M. 1979. Environmental Word-List. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. International Rural Development Centre, Uppsala.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zev Naveh
    • 1
  • Arthur S. Lieberman
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Agricultural EngineeringTechnion—Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Landscape Architecture Program, New York State College of Agriculture and Life SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations