Abstract
Does a larger monetary union mean easier monetary policy? It depends to a large extent on the structure of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the process by which its members are appointed. In May 1998, the European Union decided who was to be in and out of the European Monetary Union (EMU). The ins subsequently decided who will run the ECB. Who influences the appointment process, and what does the process imply for monetary policy? This chapter attempts to address these questions using a formal model of the appointment process. Results indicate that the institutional structure of the appointment process combined with the status quo at the time of the appointments may ensure relatively tight monetary policy despite the entrance of traditionally high inflation countries like Italy, Greece, or the potential new members from Eastern Europe.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alesina, Alberto and Victor Grilli (1992), ‘The European Central Bank: Reshaping Monetary Politics in Europe’, in Canzoneri, Grilli, and Masson (eds.), Establishing a Central Bank: Issues in Europe and Lessons from the US. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bayoumi, Tamim and Barry Eichengreen (1996), ‘Operationalizing the Theory of Optimum Currency Areas’, CEPR Discussion Paper Series, International Macroeconomics, No. 1484 October.
Beck, Nathaniel (1982), ‘Presidential Influence on the Federal Reserve in the 1970’s’, American Journal of Political Science 26: 415–445.
Calvert, Randall L., Mathew D. McCubbins and Barry R. Weingast (1989), ‘A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion’, American Journal of Political Science 33: 588–611.
Cameron, Charles M., Albert D. Cover and Jeffrey A. Segal (1990), ‘Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model’, American Political Science Review 84 (2): 525–534.
Chang, Kelly H. (2001), ‘The President versus the Senate: Appointments in the American System of Separated Powers and the Federal Reserve’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (2): 319–355.
Chang, Kelly H. (2003), Appointing Central Bankers: The Politics of Monetary Policy in the US and EMU. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chappell, Henry W., Thomas M. Havrilesky and Rob Roy McGregor (1993), ‘Partisan Monetary Policies: Presidential Influence Through Power of Appointment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 185–218.
Chappell, Henry W., Thomas M. Havrilesky and Rob Roy McGregor (1995), ‘Policymakers, Institutions, and Central Bank Decisions’, Journal of Economics and Business 47: 113–136.
Coleman, Brian (1998), Italy’s Admission to the EMU Clique Depends on Overcoming German Fears’, The Wall Street Journal (February 17).
Cukierman, Alex (1992), Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
A Diary for 1998. The Economist (January 3, 1998): 20–21.
Dyer, Gwynn (2000), ‘Europe — Why Denmark Doesn’t Like the Euro’, The Toronto Star (September 26).
Ferejohn, John and Charles Shipan (1990), ‘Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 1–43.
Financial Times (1996), ‘Tietmayer Airs Italy Doubts’, November 29, p. 2.
Financial Times (1996), ‘EMU Membership Doubts Fail to Disturb Lira’, October 2, p. 37.
Financial Times (1996), ‘Italy to Approve Tough Budget’, September 28, p. 1.
Financial Times (1996), ‘Convergence not Whole Story for Italy’s Yields’, December 2, p. 26.
Financial Times (1996), ‘Italy Rejoins ERM’, November 25, p. 2.
Financial Times (1997), ‘Italy Angry at Conjecture over Delayed Entry of Lira to EMU’, February 6, p. 17.
Hammond, Thomas H. and Jeffrey S. Hill (1993), ‘Deference or Preference? Explaining Senate Confirmation of Presidential Nominees to Administrative Agencies’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 5: 23–59.
Havrilesky, Thomas (1993), The Pressures on Monetary Policy. New York: Kluwer.
Havrilesky, Thomas (1995), The Pressures on Monetary Policy, Second Edition. New York: Kluwer.
Havrilesky, Thomas and John Gildea (1991), ‘The Policy Preferences of FOMC Members as Revealed by Dissenting Votes’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 23 (1): 130–138.
International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics. International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, various years.
Keech, William R. and Irwin L. Morris (1996), ‘Appointments, Presidential Power, and the Federal Reserve’, Journal of Macroeconomics 19 (2): 253–267.
Kenen, Peter B. (1995), Economic and Monetary Union in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kosters, Wim, Manfred J. M. Neumann, Renate Ohr, Roland Vaubel et al. (1998), ‘German Economics Professors Convinced ‘Orderly Postponement’ of Euro Essential. Letters to the Editor’, Financial Times (February 9).
Lemieux, Peter H. and Charles H. Stewart III (1990), ‘Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominations from Washington to Reagan’, Working Papers in Political Science P-90–3. The Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
Lohmann, Susanne (1992), ‘Optimal Credibility in Monetary Policy: Credibility versus Flexibility’, American Economic Review 82: 273–286.
Moe, Terry (1985), ‘Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB’, The American Political Science Review 79: 1094–1116.
Moe, Terry (1987b), ‘Interests, Institutions, and Positive Theory: The Politics of the NLRB’, Studies in American Policy Development 2: 236–299.
Moraski, Bryon and Charles Shipan (1999), ‘The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices’, American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1069–1095.
Morris, Irwin L. (2000), Congress, the President, and the Federal Reserve: The Politics of American Monetary Policy. University of Michigan Press.
Mundell, Robert A. (1961), ‘A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas’, American Economic Review 51: 657–665.
Nokken, Timothy P. and Brian R. Sala (2000), ‘Confirmation Dynamics: A Model of Presidential Appointments to Independent Agencies’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 12: 91–112.
Persson, Torsten and Guido Tabellini (eds.) (1994), Monetary and Fiscal Policy, Volume 1: Credibility. Boston: MIT Press.
Persson, Torsten and Guido Tabellini (1999), ‘Political Economics and Macroeconomic Policy’, in John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford (eds.), The Handbook of Macroeconomics. Oxford: Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
Roche, David (1996), ‘Europe’s Faded Photocopy Democracy’, Euromoney (December): 24–25.
Rogoff, Kenneth (1985), ‘The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Target’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 100: 1169–1190.
Rubinstein, Ariel (1982), ‘Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model’, Econometrica 50: 97–109.
Segal, Jeffrey A., Charles M. Cameron and Albert D. Cover (1992), ‘A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting: Senators, Constituents, Presidents, and Interest Groups in Supreme Court Confirmations’, American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 96–121.
Sims, G. Thomas (2002), ‘Policy Spat Threatens Markets’, The Wall Street Journal (October 18–20): A2.
Snyder, Susan, and Barry Weingast (2000), ‘The American System of Shared Powers: The President, Congress, and the NLRB’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16 (2): 269–305.
Treaty on European Union (1992).
Waller, Christopher J. (1992), ‘A Bargaining Model of Partisan Appointments to the Central Bank’, Journal of Monetary Economics 29 (3): 411–428.
Waller, Christopher J. (2000), ‘Policy Boards and Policy Smoothing’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics (February): 305–339.
Waller, Christopher J. and Carl E. Walsh (1996), ‘Central-Bank Independence, Economic Behavior, and Optimal Term Lengths’, American Economic Review 86 (5): 1139–1153.
Woolley, John T. (1984), The Federal Reserve and the Politics of Monetary Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, K.H. (2003). The European Central Bank. In: Franzese, R., Mooslechner, P., Schürz, M. (eds) Institutional Conflicts and Complementarities. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4062-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4062-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5380-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4062-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive