Advertisement

Enhancement of Semidiurnal Tidal Currents in the Tidal Inlets to Mississippi Sound

  • Harvey E. Seim
  • James E. Sneed
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies book series (COASTAL, volume 29)

Abstract

Harmonic analysis of data collected in Mississippi Sound and the adjacent continental shelf in 1980 and 1981 indicates a pronounced difference between offshore and inshore tidal current regimes. On the shelf, the form number of the water levels and currents are approximately equal (6–7), while currents in the tidal inlets to Mississippi Sound have form numbers less than half that of the corresponding water levels. Most of the variation in current form number can be explained by a change from a two- to a one-dimensional flow field. Theoretical form numbers derived for Sverdrup waves and uniform flow through an inlet indicate continuity causes semidiurnal currents to increase relative to diurnal currents at the inlets and results in the reduced current form number. Water levels are not affected by the continuity constraint. Variations in the observed current form numbers from theoretical values are caused by compound tides and overtides of the diurnal constituents, which have contaminated the harmonic constant estimates of semidiurnal currents. The K2/K1 ratio (K2 representing the first harmonic of K1 generated locally) is estimated to be 0.3 in the inlet currents, and the two waves differ in phase by 180°. The enhancement of semidiurnal currents should occur in most tidal inlets bordering mixed or diurnal seas.

Keywords

Tidal Inlet Semidiurnal Tide Form Number Astronomical Tide Inertial Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubrey, D.G. and Speer, P.E., 1985. A study of non-linear tidal propagation in shallow inlet/estuarine systems. Part I: Observations. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 21:185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boon, J. and Bryne, R.J., 1981. On basin hypsometry and the morphodynamic response of coastal inlets. Mar. Geol, 40:27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng, R.T. and Gartner, J.W., 1985. Harmonic analysis of tides and tidal currents in south San Francisco Bay, California. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 21:57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Defant, A., 1960. Physical Oceanography. Vol. 2. London: Pergammon Press, 598 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Dietrich, G., Kelle, K., Knauss, W. and Siedler, G., 1980. General Oceanography, an Introduction. New York: Wiley and Sons, 626 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Gill, A., 1982. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. New York: Academic Press, 662 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Hendershott, M.C., 1981. Long waves and ocean tides. In: Wunsch, C. and Warren, B.F. (eds.), Evolution of Physical Oceanography. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 292–341.Google Scholar
  8. Kjerfve, B. and Sneed, J.E., 1984. Analysis and synthesis of oceanographic conditions in the Mississippi Sound offshore region. Final Report. Contract DACW01–83-R-0014. Mobile, AL: Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, 253 pp.Google Scholar
  9. National Ocean Survey, 1981. Mississippi Sound hydrodynamic modelling study. Tidal data collection USCEM/NOS cooperative agreement. Final report by Tidal requirement and Acquisition Branch, Tides and Water Levels Division. Office of Oceanography, NOS, 15 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Outlaw, D.G., 1980. Preliminary results from harmonic analysis of Mississippi Sound tide data. Memorandum for Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksberg, MS: Army Corps of Engineers, 131 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Pedley, M., Paren, J.G. and Potter, J.R., 1986. The tidal spectrum underneath Antarctic ice shelves. J. Geophys. Res., 91:13,001–13,009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Raytheon Corporation, 1981. Mississippi Sound data collection program. Final Report Vol. I. Contract DACW01–80-C-0104. East Providence, RI: Raytheon Ocean Systems, Inc., 142 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Raytheon Corporation, 1982. Mississippi Sound and adjacent areas. Data Collection program. Final Report. Contract DACW01–80-C-0104. Mobile, AL: Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, 72 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Schureman, P., 1958. Manual of harmonic analysis and prediction of tides. Special Pub. 98. Washington, DC: U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 313 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Seim, H.E., Kjerfve, B. and Sneed, J.E., 1987. Tides of Mississippi Sound and the adjacent continental shelf. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 25:143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Speer, P.E. and Aubrey, D.G., 1985. A study of non-linear tidal propagation in shallow inlet/estuarine systems. Part II: Theory. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 21:206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey E. Seim
    • 1
  • James E. Sneed
    • 2
  1. 1.ClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal ResearchUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations