Advertisement

Ebb-Tidal Delta Dynamics for a Tide-Dominated Barrier Island

  • William J. Reynolds
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies book series (COASTAL, volume 29)

Abstract

The interaction of wave and tidal processes in the vicinity of tidal inlets that bound barrier islands may yield depositional features that have significant, and even controlling, influence on barrier island morphology. Ebb-tidal deltas formed at the updrift end of barrier islands protect a portion of the island from incoming wave energy and produce refractive effects that determine longshore current magnitude and direction. These shoal areas also provide sediment reservoirs for the natural nourishment of

Marco Island, Florida is a tide-dominated morphology despite its microtidal range. The refractive effects of the updrift shoal are sufficient to produce longshore current divergence and formation of a nodal zone. The ebb-tidal delta not only effects morphology to its lee and near-downdrift beaches but also is a dominant control for shoreline movement along the entire six kilometers of beach. Shoreline movement trends were established by analyzing an air photo time series that included fifteen years of record within a 41 year (1940–1981) time span. Eight years of photographic coverage during the 1971–1981 period permitted determination of an area budget for the island. In this study, measured areal shoreline change was used as a surrogate for sediment gain/loss. Relative shoreline movement trends were established that showed cause and effect relationships of various parts of the Marco Island shoreline.

The resultant conceptual process model developed is believed to be valid for barrier islands bounded by ebb-tidal deltas. Interpretation of the inlet morphology can allow prediction of shoreline movement trends and emphasizes the consequences that may result if dredging or natural processes significantly alter the extent of these shoal

Keywords

Aerial Photograph Barrier Island Shoreline Change Tidal Inlet Beach Ridge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boothroyd, J.C., 1985. Tidal inlets and tidal deltas. Coastal Sedimentary Environments, Richard A. Davis Jr. (ed.), New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 287–360.Google Scholar
  2. Davies, J.L., 1964. A morphogenic approach to world shorelines. Zeit, für Geomophology, 8:27–42.Google Scholar
  3. Dean, R.G. and Walton, T.L., 1975. Sediment transport in the vicinity of inlets with special reference to sand trapping. In: Cronin, L.E. (ed.), Estuarine Research, New York, Academic Press, p. 129–150.Google Scholar
  4. Fitzgerald, D.M., 1982. Sediment bypassing at mixed energy tidal inlets. Proceedings, 8th Coastal Engineering Conference, p. 1094–1118.Google Scholar
  5. Hayes, M.O., 1976. Terrigenous Clastic Depositional Environments. Technical Report No. 11, CDR, Department of Geology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, 184 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Hayes, M.O., 1979. Barrier island morphology as a function of tidal and wave regime. In: Leatherman, S.P. (ed.), Barrier Islands: From the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Mexico, New York, Academic Press, p. 1–28.Google Scholar
  7. King, C.A.M., 1972. Beaches and Coasts. New York: St. Marten’s Press, 570 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Nummedal, D. and Fisher, I.A., 1978. Process response models for depositional shorelines: the German and the Georgia bights. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Coastal Engineering Conference, 2:1215–1231.Google Scholar
  9. Reynolds, W.J., 1982. Societal responses to beach erosion. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, 346 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Reynolds, W.J., 1985. Ebb tidal deltas and barrier island morphology. Proceedings, Coastal Zone ′85, Baltimore, p. 1314–1323.Google Scholar
  11. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1972. Beach erosion control study, Collier County, Florida. Jacksonville Engineer District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville, Florida, 74 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • William J. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Computer ScienceUnited States Military AcademyWest PointUSA

Personalised recommendations