Advertisement

DARTS (Digital Automated Radar Tracking System): Application to Tidal Inlet Hydrodynamic Studies

  • G. A. Meadows
  • L. A. Meadows
  • L. L. Weishar
  • M. L. Fields
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies book series (COASTAL, volume 29)

Abstract

The mapping of strong tidally driven currents and waves through navigable inlets and restricted channels has proven to be both difficult and costly. The placement of semipermanent moored current meters and directional wave gauges is often logistically difficult, and, if measurement of surface currents is desired, poses an additional hazard to navigation. In addition, analysis of post-experimental current and wave records often requires substantial time and effort. Recent advances in digital radar technology have made possible the development of a remote ocean probe specifically designed to acquire high quality wave and current data in realtime: the Digital Automated Radar Tracking System (DARTS). DARTS was developed to provide coverage of relatively large ocean and inlet regions from a single shore monitoring station. In the wave measuring mode, DARTS acquires a spatial mapping of radar return intensities from the steep faces of approaching ocean surface waves. From this matrix of sea surface return intensities, a spatial Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is applied to obtain an estimate of the directional wavenumber spectrum for the incident sea surface. In the current measuring mode, passive drogue floats equipped with radar reflectors are used to produce automatically Lagrangian trajectories and velocities. Remote current mapping of inlet regions up to 30 km has been completed successfully with the DARTS system. DARTS has been deployed successfully in the wave measuring mode as part of the SUPERDUCK 86 Field Experiment at the Coastal Engineering Research Center’s Field Research Facility at Duck, NC, and in the current monitoring mode in Upper Cook Inlet, AK, to map the strong tidally driven circulation in that region.

Keywords

Tidal Inlet Radar Reflector Wavenumber Spectrum Cook Inlet Radar Return 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brekhovskikh, L.M., 1960. Waves in Layered Media. Academic, New York, 460 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Evmenov, V. F., Kozhukhov, I.V., Nichiporenko, H.T. and Khuoap, G.D., 1973. Test of the Radar Method of Defining Ocean Wave Elements. Fluid Mech. Sov. Res., 2(5):141–145.Google Scholar
  3. Hamilton, R.E., 1979. Construction Tolerances for Corner Reflectors. Interim Tech Report Radar and Optics Div., Environmental Research Institute of Michigan.Google Scholar
  4. Hoogeboom, P. and Rosenthal, W., 1982. Directional Wavespectra in Radar Images. IGARRS, Paper WA-2, Munich, June 1–4.Google Scholar
  5. Hoogeboom, P., Kleijweg, J.C.M. and van Halsema, D., 1986. Seawave Measurements Using a Ships Radar. Proceedings Int. Geo. & Remote Sensing Symposium, Zurich, p. 819–823.Google Scholar
  6. Kalmykov, A.I. and Pustovoytenko, V.V., 1976. On Polarization Features of Radio Signals Scattered from the Sea Surface at Small Grazing Angles. J. Geophys. Res., 81:1960–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirwin, A.D., McNally, G., Chang, M.S. and Molinari, R., 1974. The Effect of Wind and Surface Currents on Drifters. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 5:361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lyzenga, D.R., Maffett, A.L. and Shuchman, R.A., 1983. The Contribution of Wedge Scattering to the Radar Cross Section of the Ocean Surface. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-21:502–505.Google Scholar
  9. Mattie, M.G., Hsiao, V.S. and Evans, D.D., 1981. Wave Direction Measured by Four Different Systems. IEEE, J. Oceanic Eng., OE-6:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Picket, R.L., Campbell, J.E., Clites, A.H. and Partridge, R.M., 1983. Satellite-Tracked Currents Drifters in Lake Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res., 9(1): 106–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Picket, R.L. and Lee, J., 1986. Estimating Currents Without a Current Meter. Argos Newsletter, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Seltzer, J.E., 1967. Spatial Densities for Specular Points on a Gaussian Surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas. Propag., AP-20:723–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, B.G., 1967. Geometrical Shadowing of a Random Rough Surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas. Propag., AP-15:668–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stewart, R.H., 1985. Methods of Satellite Oceanography. Univ. of California Press, Los Angeles, 360 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Valenzuela, G.R., 1978. Theories for the Interaction of Electromagnetic and Oceanic Waves — A Review. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 13:61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wagner, R.F., 1967. Shadowing of Randomly Rough Surfaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 41:138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Willis, T.G. and Beaumont, H., 1971. Wave Direction Measurements Using Sea Surveillance Radars. Tech. Memo. TR 118, R. Aircraft Establishment, Farnbough, Great Britian.Google Scholar
  18. Wright, F.F., 1965. Wave Observations by Shipboard Radar. Ocean Sci. Ocean. Eng., 1:506–514.Google Scholar
  19. Young, I.R., Rosenthal, W. and Ziemer, F., 1985. A Three Dimensional Analysis of Marine Radar Images for the Determination of Ocean Wave Directionality and Surface Currents. J. Geophys. Res., 90:1049–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Meadows
    • 1
  • L. A. Meadows
    • 1
  • L. L. Weishar
    • 2
  • M. L. Fields
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Naval Architecture and Marine EngineeringThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Coastal Engineering Research CenterU.S. Army Waterways Experiment StationVicksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations