Advertisement

Information Technology and the New Culture of Patient Safety

  • Joyce Sensmeier
  • Kathleen Covert Kimmel
Part of the Health Informatics Series book series (HI)

Abstract

Despite having unparalleled technology and resources, the U.S. healthcare system has room for improvement. Impressive advancements in medical knowledge have accelerated at a mind-boggling rate, but access to patient information and knowledge resources is limited and not readily available to the majority of providers. Innovative surgical procedures using advanced diagnostic equipment offer a sophisticated understanding of a patient’s condition; however, information distribution and communication are hampered by the manual, paper-based charts present in most healthcare organizations. Handwritten medication orders are error prone, and deciphering handwriting is frequently a challenge for those processing orders. Medications with similar names but different action classes, effects, and dose ranges further complicate the medication management process. Front-line employees make high-risk decisions that require judgment and choices involving many variables with minimal system support [1].

Keywords

Patient Safety Improve Patient Safety Computerize Physician Order Entry Healthcare Information Computerize Physician Order Entry System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Valusek JR. Decision support: a paradigm addition for patient safety. J Healthcare Inform Manag 2002; 16 (1): 33–39.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma’Luf N, Boyle D, Leape L. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6 (4): 331–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    th Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey. Sponsored by Superior Consultant Company; 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Information for health: a strategy for building the national health information infrastructure. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The White House Office of the Press Secretary. Press Briefing by Senior Administrative Officials on President’s Initiative to Reduce Medical Errors, February 22, 2000. http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov.
  7. 7.
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to Congress: selected medical issues. 1999; June.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shojannia KG, Duncan BF, McDonald KM, Wachter RM. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. AHRQ Publication 01-E058.2001; July 20.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    California Senate Bill No. 1875. Chapter 816, Statutes of 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manning J. State will ask hospitals for details on quality of care, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 2002 November 30; http://www.jsonline.com/bym/News/nov02/99987.asp.
  11. 11.
    Tieman J. Racing to the finish: House passes bills, but it still has a tough battle. Modern Healthcare 2002; September 23: 12–13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morrissey J. Making IT compute. Modern Healthcare 2002; September 16: 6–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. 2001 Congressional Review. Advocacy Dispatch 2001 January 18; http://www.himss.org/about/advocacy.asp.
  14. 14.
    Daily Dose E-Mail. FDA implementing changes with new labels. Modern Healthcare 2002; January 2.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    FDA public meeting on bar code labeling for drugs; 2002 July 26; http://www.fda.gov/oc/speeches/2002/barcode0726.html.
  16. 16.
    Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. CDC’s ongoing push to create a national bioterrorism early warning system. HIMSS NewsBreak 2001; December 24.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lovern E. Minding hospitals’ business: purchasing coalition pushes hospitals to improve patient safety through process measures, but industry says standards are too expensive. Modern Healthcare 2001; May 28.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kilbridge P, Welebob E, Classen D. Overview of the Leapfrog Group evaluation tool for computerized physician order entry. Leapfrog Group and First Consulting Group. 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Falci RG, Steward RT, Weinberger A. An update on the Leapfrog movement: a macro catalyst is maturing into a fundamental change agent. Bear Stearns Equity Research White Paper. 2001; September 6.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Media Release Three Fortune 500 companies join Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield to recognize and reward hospitals that achieve Leapfrog safety standards. Empire BCBS 2001; October 19.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robinson AR, Hohmann KB, Rifkin JI, et al. Physician and public opinions on quality of health care and the problem of medical errors. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kilbridge P. Crossing the chasm with information technology: bridging the quality gap in health care. California Healthcare Foundation; 2002 July.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beers JB, Berger MA. Medical errors: sources and solutions. Proceedings of 2001 Annual HIMSS Conference and Exhibition, session 17, 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Testimony. 1999; June 23–24.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998; 280: 1311–1316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clinical Initiatives Center Prescription for Change. Best practices for medication management. Washington, DC.; The Advisory Board Company. 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    O’Leary D. Statement of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations before the U.S. Senate and the Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. 2001 February 22. http://www.jcaho.org/govt/oleary_02220.html.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ball MJ, Douglas JV. IT, patient safety, and quality care. J Healthcare Inform Manag 2002; 16 (1): 28–33.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simpson N. Advocacy White Paper: Bar coding for patient safety. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society; 2001 December. http://www.himss.org/advocacy/about/advocacy.asp.
  31. 31.
    Barker KN, Flynn EA, Pepper GA, Bates DW, Mikeal RL. Medication error observed in 36 health care facilities. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1897–1903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnson CL, Carlson RA, Tucker CL, Willette C. Using BCMA software to improve patient safety in Veterans Administration Medical Centers. J Healthcare Inform Manag 2002; 16 (1): 46–51.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Inform Assoc, August 2001; 8: 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ricci R, Barr N, Hamilton S. Proceedings from the VHA Annual Meeting. Pain management for healthcare executives: IT solutions for healthcare. 2002 April 24. Courtesy of the VHA.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Glaser J, Teich JM, Kumperman G. Impact of information events on medical care. Proceedings of the 1996 Annual HIMSS Conference and Exhibition, 1996.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Manzo J, Taylor RG, Cusick D. Measuring medication related ROI; a process improvement after implementing POE. HIMSS News 2001 February.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Solovy A. Healthcare’s most wired 2002. Hospitals & Health Networks 2002 July; 38–48.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dennings EH. Healthcare management consultants. Cerner Corporation. 2001 June 22.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Duncan MA. Simplified financial ROI for an ambulatory CPR. Gartner Group; 1998 October.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scalise D. Physician order entry: IMKI to success. Hospitals and Health Networks 2002; Oct:24–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joyce Sensmeier
  • Kathleen Covert Kimmel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations