Nursing Administration: A Growing Role in Systems Development

  • Mary Etta Mills
Part of the Health Informatics Series book series (HI)

Abstract

Healthcare systems are dependent on high-quality information collection, integration, and accessibility of data for clinical and administrative decision making. Information systems must provide data able to be used to evaluate and predict utilization of human and material resources, determine effectiveness of care through patient outcomes, develop budget projections, support the analysis of comparative health services, and project trends on which plans of action can be formulated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Management of information. In: 2002 Hospital Accreditation Standards. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources, Inc.; 2002. p. 239–256.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104.191, F of Title II. 45 CFR Parts 160 and 162 (HCFA-0149F) RIN 0938-A158 (pp. 60313–50372 ); 1996 August 21.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mills ME. Computer-based health care data and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act: implications for informatics. Policy Politics Nurs Pract 2001;(2):33–38.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quade G, Novotny J, Burde B, et al. Worldwide telemedicine services based on distributed multimedia electronic patient records by using the second generation Web server Hyperwave. In: Lorenzi NM, editor. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Proceedings’99. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1999. p. 916–920.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buerhaus, PI, Needleman J, Mattke S, et al. Strengthening hospital nursing. Health Affairs 2002; 21: 123–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, et al. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002; 288: 1987–1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mercer TA. JCAHO staffing model. Adv Nurses 2001; 31–32.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rudy EB, Lucke JF, Whitman GR, et al. Benchmarking patient outcomes. J Nurs Scholar 2001; 2: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newhouse RP, Mills ME. Nursing leadership in the organized delivery system for the acute care setting. Washington DC: American Nurses Association; 2002, p. 35.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Nurses Association. Nursing-sensitive quality indicators for acute care settings and ANA’ s safety and quality initiative. Washington DC: American Nurses Association; 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    American Nurses Association. Nursing-sensitive indicators for non-acute care settings and ANA’ s safety and quality initiative. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association; 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kerfoot K, Simpson R. Knowledge-driven care: powerful medicine. Reflections on Nursing Leadership 2002;3: 22–24, 44.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stead WW, Miller RA, Musen MA, et al. Integration and beyond: linking information from disparate sources and into workflow. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7: 135–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simpson RL. Eyeing IT trends and challenges. Nurs Manag 2002; 33: 46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Science and Technology Council. Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Supplement to the President’s FY 2003 Budget. Arlington, VA: National Coordination Office for Information Technology and Research and Development; 2003. p. 19.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gregg AC. Performance management data systems for nursing service organizations. JONA 2002; 32: 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Etta Mills
    • 1
  1. 1.Maryland School of NursingBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations