Advertisement

The Electronic Health Record: A New Form of Interaction

  • Betty L. Chang
Part of the Health Informatics Series book series (HI)

Abstract

Information technologies, such as the Internet, the World Wide Web, interactive TV, and media kiosks have increased consumers’ access to health information and have effected a paradigm shift in the delivery of health care. Privacy guidelines developed as a result of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) have also given consumers increased specific rights and powers [1]. Today’s consumers have the right to access their health records, obtain copies of these records, amend and correct these records, and control access by third parties. The opportunity to obtain and exercise control over healthcare information has empowered consumers to become partners with their healthcare providers (HCP) in decision making. In short, information and communication technologies have transformed consumers (patients) from passive recipients to active participants [2]. This chapter describes ways in which consumers become owners of their health information. It will discuss the potential of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), as well as the benefits, challenges, and areas for future research that it presents. Various avenues by which consumers can access health information and communicate with their healthcare providers have been well characterized in other literature and are not detailed in this chapter.

Keywords

Smart Card Electronic Health Record Personal Health Record Healthcare Information Electronic Health Record System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    USDHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. Final rule, 45 CRF Parts 160 and 164, RIN 0991– AB14; 2002. http://www.hhs/gov/ocr/hipaa/privruletxt.txt. Accessed 12–1–02.
  2. 2.
    Ball MJ, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inform 2001;61(1).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NHS Information Authority. Information for health—an information strategy for the modern NHS; 2002. http://www.nhsia.nhs.uk/.Accessed Dec.2002.
  4. 4.
    Kim MI, Johnson KB. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. J A Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baur C, Deering MJ, Hsu L. ehealth: federal issues and approaches. In: Rice RE, Katz JE, editors. The Internet and health communications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001. pp. 355–384.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Electronic Health Records Taskforce. Health Online Action-Plan, 2nd ed., 2002. http://www.health.gov.au/healthonline/. Accessed 2003.
  7. 7.
    Patton MA. Research to impact national electronic health record agenda. DSTC Media Release; 2003. DSTC: http://www.dstc.edu.au. Accessed 2003.
  8. 8.
    Nash DB, Shulkin D, Comite F, et al., and the Winona Health Online Outcome Group. Measurement of the impact of health online. Dis Manag 2001; 4 (1): 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morrissey J. Minn. town to get health data online. Week in Healthcare; 2002. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/.12–3–02.
  10. 10.
    Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange; 2003. http://www.carescience.com/healthcare_providers/cde/. Accessed 12–4–02
  11. 11.
    Wendland M. News Front, Press Press; Dec. 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagland M. Finding the e in healthcare. Healthcare Informatics 2001; November.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turisco F, Metzger J. Rural health care delivery: connecting communities through technology. ihealth Reports 2002 (prepared by First Consulting Group, 17).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cimino JJ, Patel VL, Kushniruk AW. The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): technical solutions and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical records. Int J Med Inform 2002; 68 (1–3): 113–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Masys D, Baker D, Butros A, Cowles, KE. Giving patients access to their medical records via the Internet. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9 (2): 181–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shea S, Starren J. Columbia University’s informatics for diabetes education and telemedicine project: rationale and design. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9 (1): 49–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Starren J, et al. Columbia University’s Informatics for diabetes education and telemedicine project: technical implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9 (1): 25–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Safran C. The collaborative edge: patient empowerment for vulnerable populations. Int J Med Inform 2003; 69 (2–3): 185–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ueckert FK, Prokosch H. Implementing security and access control mechanisms for an electronic healthcare record. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium 2002. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2002.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001; 285 (20): 2621–2612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferguson T. E-patients: Robert Wood Johnson White Paper. Presented at the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association, Nov. 2002, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferguson T. What e–patients do online: a tentative taxonomy. Ferguson Reports, #9, Nov. 2002. http://www.fergusonreport.com/.Accessed 1–16–03.
  23. 23.
    Sands D. Electronic patient centered communication resource center. http://www.e-pcc.org. Accessed 1–16–03.
  24. 24.
    Fox S. Vital decisions. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org. Accessed Nov. 2002.
  25. 25.
    Baldwin G. Automating patient records. Reprinted from Technology in Practice 2002;3(3).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goldman J, Hudson Z. Virtually exposed: privacy and e-health. Health Affairs 2000; 19 (6): 140–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brubaker B. Sensitive Kaiser E-mails go astray. Washington Post 2000; Aug. 10; Sect. E1.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Public Law No. 104–191. Section 1173, USC 201. 1996.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fox S, Wilson R. HIPAA regulations: Final. HIPAA Regs 2003; <http://www.hipaadvisory.com/regs/>.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pitts J. Implementing the Federal health privacy rule in California; 2003. http://www.chcf.org/topics/view.cfm?itemid=19670. Accessed 1/22/2003.
  31. 31.
    Baker DB, Masys DR. PCASSO: a design for secure communication of personal health information via the Internet. Int J Med Inform 1999; 54 (2): 97–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    The Gallup Organization. Public attitudes towards medical privacy. The Institute for Health Freedom; 2000. http://www.forhealthfreedom.org/Gallupsurvey/.
  33. 33.
    iHealthbeat. 2001. Business & finance: survey. http://www.ihealthbeat.org/members/basecontent. Accessed 1/22/2003.
  34. 34.
    Thomson Corporation and Health Data Management. Survey: hospitals boosting data security. http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/html/. Accessed 1/22/2003.
  35. 35.
    Grimson J. Delivering the electronic healthcare record for the 21st century. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64 (2–3): 111–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Betty L. Chang
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Angeles School of NursingUniversity of CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations