Advertisement

Measuring Outcomes: Bringing Six Sigma Excellence to Health Care

  • Charlotte A. Weaver
  • Tonya Hongsermeier
Part of the Health Informatics Series book series (HI)

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) report on medical errors, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Care System, published in 2000, sent shock waves across the United States and across the healthcare industry [1]. As concern intensified, business coalitions, the insurance industry, state legislatures, health policy groups, and Congress have engaged to drive fundamental change in healthcare quality management in the U.S., focusing particularly on the measurement and analysis of care delivery practices and processes. Industry leaders acknowledge that this profound change will not come from within the industry but will be imposed upon the healthcare provider segment of the industry by external forces [2]. As they prepare to make this inevitable transformation, administrators and clinical leaders are looking for guidance as to the appropriate direction to take.

Keywords

National Health Service Healthcare Organization Quality Report National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Clinical Information System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Business Round Table. BRT-Sponsored inititiative focuses on patient safety. Press Release; 2000 Jan. 26. http://www.brtable.org/press.cfm/375.
  2. 2.
    Boodman SG. No end to errors. The Washington Post 2002 Dec 3; HE:01.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Hospital Association. AHA White Paper: the state of hospitals’ financial health 2002. AHA: Chicago; 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millenson ML. Demanding medical excellence, second ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. Committee on Health Care Quality in America, Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shine KI. Health care quality and how to achieve it. Robert H. Ebert Memorial Lecture. The Milbank Memorial Fund: 2001; p. 1–13. http://www.milbank.org/reports/020120Ebert/020130Ebert.html.
  7. 7.
    Chassin MR, Galvin RW, and the National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. The urgent need to improve health care quality. JAMA 1998; 280 (11): 1000–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hurtado MP, Swift EK, Corrigan JM, editors. Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chassin MR. Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? Milbank Q 1998; 76 (4): 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Factiva Internet Search. 2002 Jan. to 2002 Dec. 31.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coye MJ. No Toyotas in health care: why medical care has not evolved to meet patients’ needs. Health Affairs 2001; 20 (6): 44–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    U.S. Census Bureau. Health insurance coverage: 1999. Current population survey. By Robert J. Mills. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; September 2000. Online at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthin99.html.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berwick DM. As good as it should get: making health care better in the new millennium. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldsmith J, Blumenthal D, Rishel W. Federal health information policy: a case of arrested development. In process, April 2003. hfutures@healthfutures.net.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coye MJ, Detmer DE. Quality at a crossroads. Milbank Q 1998; 76 (4): 1 - 6. Available at: http://www.milbank.org/quarterly/764featcoye.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leapfrog Group. 2003; April. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/about.htm.
  18. 18.
    Leapfrog Group FactSheets, 2003; April. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/FactSheets/ CPOE_FactSheet.pdf; http://www.leapfroggroup.org/FactSheets/EHR_FactSheet.pdf; http://www.leapfroggroup.org/FactSheets/ICU_FactSheet.pdf.
  19. 19.
    State of Wisconsin. Press Release, 2002; December 6. http://www.wha.org/mo/wha/leapfrog.htm.
  20. 20.
    Coye MJ. No Toyotas in health care. Health Affairs 2001; 20 (6): 44–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chassin MR. Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? Milbank Q 1998; 76 (4): 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hewitt M, Simone JV, editors. Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams SV, Nash DB, Goldfarb N. Differences in mortality from coronary artery bypass graft surgery at five teaching hospitals. JAMA 1991; 266: 810–815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, et al. The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 1996; 276: 1054–1059.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998; 280: 1747–1751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roohan PJ, Bicknell NA, Baptiste MS, et al. Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 454–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations. Results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1999; 230 (3): 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Asch SM, Sloss EM, Hogan C, Brook RH, Kravitz RL. Measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly Medicare beneficiaries using inpatient and outpatient claims. JAMA 2000; 284 (18): 2325–2333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 348: 2635–2645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Helmreich RL. Managing human error in aviation. Sci Am 1997; 276: 62–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pande PS, Neuman RP, Cavanagh RR. The Six Sigma way. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harry MJ. Six Sigma: a breakthrough strategy for profitability. Quality Progress 1998; 31 (5): 60–64.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hurtado MP, Swift EK, Corrigan JM, editors. Designing the national health care quality report. In: Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. p. 139–158.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Department of Health. National Service Frameworks, and NHS Performance Indicators. Leeds, England: National Health Service (NHS) Executive. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.uk.nhsperformanceindicators 2000; and at: http://www.doh.gov.uk.hsf.about.htm (February 6, 2001).
  35. 35.
    Enthoven AC. In pursuit of an improving National Health Service. Health Affairs 2000; 19 (3): 102–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mulligan J, Appleby J, Harrison A. Measuring the performance of health systems. Br Med J 2000; 321: 191–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    JCAHO’s Patient Safety Goals 2002 Apr. Available at: http://www.jcaho.org/accredited+organizations/patient+safety/npsg/npsg_03.htm.
  38. 38.
    National Quality Forum. Hospital care national performance measures. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2000.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    National Quality Forum. A national framework for healthcare quality measurement and reporting. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2003.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    National Quality Forum. A comprehensive framework for hospital care performance evaluation; 2003 Apr. http://www.qualityforum.org/membersonly.
  41. 41.
    Arndt M. Where precision is life or death: the nuts and bolts of Six Sigma. Business Week 2002; July 22: 72–73.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pember M. Quality transformation: the journey. Conference Proceedings. Kansas City, MO: Cerner Healthcare Conference; October 12, 2002.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Robert Woods Johnson Foundation. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org or http://www.ihi.org/pursuingperfection/.
  44. 44.
    Berwick DM. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston MA. Available at: http://www.ihi.org and DBerwick@IHI.org (April 2003).
  45. 45.
    Tallahassee Memorial Pursing Perfection Project Description. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/pursuingperfection/projectparticipants/tmh/TMHCReportAcuteApril03.pdf (April 2003).
  46. 46.
    Wysocki B Jr. Treatments—Medication Makeover: Tallahassee Memorial hospital is upending the way it prescribes and delivers drugs. Wall Street Journal 2002; Nov. 11.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Daley J. About the National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Forum. VA Health Serv Res Dev 1998; Nov.:1–3.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1998; 228(4):491–507. PMID: 9790339 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE].Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Best WR, Khuri SF, Phelan M, et al. Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194(3):257–266. PMID: 11893128 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE].Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Neumayer L, Mastin M, Vanderhoof L, Hinson D. Using the Veterans Administration National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to improve patient outcomes. J Surg Res 2000; 88(1):58–61. PMID: 10644468 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE].Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg 2002; 137(1):20–27. PMID: 1177–2210 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE].Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Malenka DJ, O’Connor GT. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group: a regional collaborative effort for continuous quality improvement in cardiovascular disease. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1998; 24 (10): 594–600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Connors HR, Weaver C, Warren J, Miller KL. An academic-business partnership for advancing clinical informatics. Nurs Educ Perspect 2002; 23 (5): 228–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlotte A. Weaver
  • Tonya Hongsermeier

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations