Skip to main content

Psycholegal Aspects of Organizational Behavior: Assessing and Controlling Risk

  • Chapter
Handbook of Psychology and Law

Abstract

“THE LIMITS OF RISK: FROM APPLES TO TERRORISM, GOVERNMENTS TRY TO ANSWER HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH,” blared the headline in a frontpage story in the New York Times (Dionne, 1989). The newspaper article reported on several incidents, all occurring within a few months of one another, that posed dilemmas for government and corporate officials concerning what to do about potential risks. In each case, organizational assessments of risk were made, and actions were, or were not, taken. In the aftermath of their decisions, governmental and corporate officials were subject to intense public and press scrutiny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronson, E. (1966) The psychology of insufficient justification. In S. Feldman (Ed.), Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequences (pp. 115–136). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M.H., & Neale, M.A. (1986). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to effective dispute resolution. In H.R. Arkes & K.R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decisionmaking: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 311–321). NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black’s Law Dictionary (4th ed.). (1968). St Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. (1989, April 3). New data on warnings expands Pan Am cases. The National Law Journal, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. (1989). Acceptable risk? Making decisions in a toxic environment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M.B., & Yeager, P.C. (1980). Corporate crime. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J.C. (1977). Beyond the shut-eyed sentry: Toward a theoretical view of corporate misconduct and an effective legal response. Virginia Law Review, 63, 1099–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J.C. (1981). “No soul to damn: No body to kick”: An unscandalized inquiry into the problem of corporate punishment. Michigan Law Review, 79, 386–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conference Report on the Toxic Substances Control Act. (1976). 94th Congress, 2nd Session (Rep. No. 94–1679). In Legislative history of the Toxic Substances Control Act (pp. 667–719). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Original work published 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality Report. (1976). Toxic substances. In Legislative history of the Toxic Substances Control Act (pp. 755–788). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Original work published 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F.T., Maakestad, W.J., & Cavender, G. (1987). Corporate crime under attack: The Ford Pinto case and beyond. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan-Cohen, M. (1985). Bureaucratic organizations and the theory of adjudication. Columbia Law Review, 85, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dan-Cohen, M. (1986). Rights, persons, and organizations: A legal theory for bureaucratic society. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.L. (1985). The “shotgun wedding” of science and law: Risk assessment and judicial review. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 10, 67–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMento, J.F. (1986). Environmental law and American business: Dilemmas of compliance. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMento, J.F. (1989). Can social science explain organizational noncompliance with environmental law? Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, E.J., Jr. (1989, March 19). The limits of risk: From apples to terrorism, governments try to answer how safe is safe enough. The New York Times (National Edition), pp. Al, A14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, J.B., & Miceli, M.P. (1985). Potential prediction of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10, 823–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1986). Cognitive illusions and their implications for the law. Southern California Law Review, 59, 225–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight J= foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgement under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds)., Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 422–444). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S.L., & Keeney, R.L. (1981) Acceptable risk. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Knowing what you want: Measuring labile values. In T. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 117–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D.R. (1983). An introduction to group dynamics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. (1936). The ego and mechanisms of defense: The writings of Anna Freud (Vol. 2). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L.M. (1973). A history of American law. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, G. (1958). The purposes of criminal punishment. Modern Law Review, 21, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor, K. (1977). The Toxic Substances Control Act: A regulatory morass. Vanderbilt Law Review, 30, 1149–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, V.P. (1989). The jury’s response to business and corporate wrongdoing. Law and Contemporary Problems, 52, 177–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans, V.P. (1990). Attitudes toward corporate responsibility: A psycholegal perspective. Nebraska Law Review, 69, 158–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, V.P., & Ermann, M.D. (1989). Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans, V.P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilts, P.J. (1989, March 27-April 2). The wrath of grapes: How the FDA halted a Chilean industry. The Washington Post National Weekly Edition, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochstedler, E. (Ed.). (1984). Corporations as criminals. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C.H., Morgan, C.P., & Paolillo, J.G.P. (1986). Organizational theory: A macro perspective for management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1986). Risk management and political culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11, 143–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H.C., & Hamilton, V.L. (1989). Crimes of obedience. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. (1985). Criminal sentences for corporations: Alternative fining mechanisms. California Law Review, 73, 443–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In L. Kohlberg (Ed.), Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development (pp. 498–582). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, M. (1988, October 10). Placing a price on human life. The National Law Journal, pp. 1, 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R., & Wehrung, D.A. (1986). Taking risks: The management of uncertainty. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., & Shapira, Z. (1982). Behavioral decision theory and organizational decision theory. In G.R. Ungson & D.N. Braunstein (Eds.), Decision making: An interdisciplinary inquiry (pp. 92–115). Boston: Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33, 1404–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, B.J., Pauker, S.G., Sox, H.C., Jr., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259–1262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G.B. (1990). Law, science, and humanity: The normative foundation of social science in law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendeloff, J.M. (1988). The dilemma of toxic substance regulation: How overregulation causes underregulation at OSHA. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P., & Near, J.P. (1984). The relationships among beliefs, organizational position, and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 687–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., & Novaco, R.W. (1980). Corporate violence: A psychological analysis. In P.D. Lipsitt & B.D. Sales (Eds.), New directions in psy-cholegal research (pp. 3–25). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1982). Risk and decision making: Perspectives and research. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1983). Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (1981). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (1986). Retaliation against whistle-blowers: Predictors and effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Note. (1976). Decisionmaking models and the control of corporate crime. Yale Law Journal, 85, 1091–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. (1987). What process is due? Courts and science-policy disputes. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C.S. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, J.E. (1990). Reviewing the empirical evidence on jury racism: Findings of discrimination or discriminatory findings? Nebraska Law Review, 69, 230–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranken, N.I. (1987). Conscientiousness and work roles. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 5, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.C. (1987). Worker responses to workplace hazards. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 12, 665–682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schräger, L.S., & Short, J.F. (1978). Toward a sociology of organizational crime. Social Problems, 25, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J.F. (1990). Hazards, risks, and enterprise: Approaches to science, law, and social policy. Law and Society Review, 24, 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigler, J.A., & Murphy, J.E. (1988). Interactive corporate compliance: An alternative to regulatory compulsion. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 10, 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1981). Informing the public about the risks from ionizing radiation. Health Physics, 41, 589–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982a). Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds)., Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 463–489). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982b). Response mode, framing, and information-processing effects in risk assessment. In R. Hogarth (Ed.), New directions f or methodology of social and behavioral science (No. 11): Question framing and response consistency (pp. 21–36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.R., & Carroll, A.B. (1984). Organizational ethics: A stacked deck. Journal of Business Ethics, 3, 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. (1975). Where the law ends: The social control of corporate behavior. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, J.A.F. (1968). Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 442–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, A.J., & Ogloff, J.R.P. (1990). Training and career options in psychology and law. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. §§2601–2629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toxic Substances Control Act Policy Research Project. (1982). The Toxic Substances Control Act: Overview and evaluation. Austin, TX: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 221, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vairo, G. (1985). Multi-tort cases: Cause for more darkness on the subject, or a new role for federal common law? Fordham Law Review, 54, 167–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1982). Toward understanding unlawful organizational behavior. Michigan Law Review, 80, 1377–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A.F. (1981). What can and should be done to protect whistle blowers in industry. In A.F. Westin (Ed.), Whistle blowing! Loyalty and dissent in the corporation (pp. 131–168). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D.D., & Janis, LL. (1980). A practical guide for making decisions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tomkins, A.J., Victor, B., Adler, R. (1992). Psycholegal Aspects of Organizational Behavior: Assessing and Controlling Risk. In: Kagehiro, D.K., Laufer, W.S. (eds) Handbook of Psychology and Law. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4040-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4038-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics