Clinical Assessment in Forensic Settings

  • Lenore E. A. Walker
  • David L. Shapiro


The above cross-examination is typical of what a forensic expert witness can expect to face when testifying to the conclusions about a person’s behavior being consistent with what is expected for someone with a particular type of mental illness. If you only used a standard clinical evaluation as your data source, which may be appropriate in an initial clinical interview to develop a treatment plan, a forensic examiner is at a disadvantage. If you also administered several clinical tests to assess for mental illness, the forensic examiner can more effectively deal with the obvious question of the client’s inconsistent behavior, such as outright lying or pretending to feign psychopathology. However, if you also review documents such as police reports and witness statements that describe the client’s behavior at the time of the incident, then you can make statements that support your opinion. The more data sources you have, the more credible is the forensic opinion.


Criminal Case Criminal Responsibility Personal Injury Legal Question Forensic Setting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Frederick, R. (1997). The validity indicator profile: Professional manual. Minnesota: National Computer Systems/Pearson.Google Scholar
  2. Grisso, T. (1997). Instruments for understanding and assessing comprehension of Miranda rights: Professional manual. Florida: Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar
  3. Heilbrun, K. (2002). Forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Hoge, S.K., Bonnie, R.J., Poythress, N.G., Monahan, J. (1997). MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool for Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA). Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Rogers, R. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS): Professional manual. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  6. Shapiro, D.L. (2001). Criminal responsibility. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press. Shapiro, D.L. (1990). Forensic psychological assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Tombaugh, T.N. (1996) Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Professional manual. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lenore E. A. Walker
    • 1
  • David L. Shapiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityFt. LauderdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations