Skip to main content

Information Retrieval under Constricted Bandwidth

Information Extraction

  • Chapter
Knowledge-Based Information Retrieval and Filtering from the Web

Part of the book series: The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science ((SECS,volume 746))

  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

Information filtering systems are designed to examine a stream of dynamically generated documents and display only those which are relevant to a user’s interests. Information retrieval systems, by contrast, are designed to respond once to each query based on the contents of a relatively static set of contents.

Most significant distinction between filtering and retrieval is the duration over which the users’ need to settled in for desire of information must be remodeled for rapid access. Users may have many interests, and the lifetime of a particular interest is widely variable in relatively dislocated environments.

In an interactive information retrieval architecture, intelligent agents can be utilized to route queries and update documents to relative locations. Between the “user-agents” (the interactive queries) and the “back-ends” (the information provider), a kernel is needed to be proactive, adaptive, wide spread, heterogeneous, dynamic and able to manage immensely huge interactivities, and to be able to react either gradually or abruptly.

On the other hand, information filtering systems must operate over relatively long time scales, and hence, the ability to observe, model and adapt to their persistence, variation and interaction of interests are important. Some progress has already been made in this direction. Utilizing query recall and modification methods of many information retrieval systems, some explicitly continuing information interests have been identified including the modifications that those interests have undergone.

Although the structure of the resulting search space is becoming more complex, machine learning techniques should obtain benefit from information systems related issues of constraints observed in actual demands/ interests. The richer vocabulary of concepts about those interests can also be used to enhance the quality of user participation in the filter design processes. Several ongoing processes in these aspects have been reviewed with follow-ups and suggestions to improve algorithms by accommodating provision of intelligent dynamic updates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robert S. Taylor, The process of asking questions, American Documentation, 13 (4): 391–396, October 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholas DeClaris (Moderator), Information Filtering and Retrieval: Overview, Issues and Directions,Basis for a Panel Discussion, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas W. Oard & Gary Marchionini, A Conceptual Framework for Text Filtering, EE-TR-96–25, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Curt Stevens, Knowledge-based Assistance for Accessing Large, Poorly Structured Information Spaces, PhD Thesis, University of Colorado, Department of Computer Science, Boulder, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CACM, 1997, Special Issue on Recommender Systems, Communications of the ACM,40(3), March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim et al, 2000, Kim, J., Oard, D.W., & Romanik, K. (2000), User modeling for information access based on implicit feedback, Technical Report: HCIL-TR2000–11/UMIACS-TR-2000–29/CS-TR-4136, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oard, D.W. & Kim, J., (1997), Modeling Information Content using Observable Behavior, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howard Turtle & W. Bruce Croft, Inference networks for document retrieval, Proceedings of the 13`“ International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1–24, ACM SIGIR, September 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salton, G., & McGill, M., (1983). Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Oard, D.W., A Comparison Study of Query and Document Translation for Cross-Language Information Retrieval, College of Library and Information Services, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rahman, H. (2003). Information Retrieval under Constricted Bandwidth. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Knowledge-Based Information Retrieval and Filtering from the Web. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 746. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3739-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3739-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5376-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3739-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics